Missouri's Governor is giving his jack booted, homicidal, white supremacist thugs all the tools needed for a limited genocide.  

I don't see a thing he could be doing differently and keep in mind that I am one of those "right wing nut jobs" that should be taking the opportunity to slam a Governor who is a Dem.

So let me repeat my question, just what would you do if you were the Governor of Missouri right now?

Imagine the audacity of that Klan cracker governor wanting to prevent the riots and destruction of property!

Of generating economic growth.  

It was his delivery of the message and the sense that the verdict has already been determined in favor of the cop that gets my ire up. The police have degenerated into a brotherhood of bullying, sadistic, latent homicidal thugs hiding behind a tin badge of authority. Excessive force is their first and favorite tool, and history proves the "brotherhood" has every grand jury intimidated from cleaning up their act.  

and it's not just the Governor predicting that the cops will not be indicted, it seems to be the consensus opinion, even by those who disagree with the most likely outcome.

So why are you blaming the Governor for what you yourself admit is a prudent action?

screaming about the assholes who convicted the cop from day one???

It is difficult to "rant" against those who pre-judge the cops when in most every incident such as Ferguson the process is opaque and historically exonerates the officer(s) in question.  

that they are exonerated more often than not because they are going up against a thuggish felon, that they are protecting themselves, are in the right to do so AND that society (the sane ones) give cops the benefit of the doubt when it comes down to a one-two second decision to shoot his fire arm or not with his life on the line?

I doubt there has ever been a case where you have NOT prejudged the cops as being guilty. Why should we give you a pass on that if you can't or won't understand why a duly elected Governor puts the safety of the community first?

It's more understandable why the "people" may pre-judge; but it is certainly not "ok".  

that right wing authoritarians cannot engage in debate without resorting to epithets and ad hominem attack?

I didn't name you or anyone else individually.

If anybody thinks this is just black people being upset your wrong!

Where a certain board poster hailed praise for the Highway Patrol?

About the same time we get to see O'bama's grades from Harvard?

Because I like you and everyone else is flawed. That is why those we vest with such power over us must be kept to a much higher standard. And you needn't look far to find recorded evidence of police overstepping their authority. Or historical trial evidence, or friends experience, or personal experience.  

The only reason he didn't flunk out is because he's black.

When you have nothing to say then you keep making things up!

So needle you assuming and making a ass out of yourself is expected.

Instead of the "Don't Shoot Coalition", why not having a "Don't Steal Coalition" first? Or a "Do You Know Where Your Children Are Coalition" instead