Politics and Religion

I have owned already that . . .
coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 66 reads
posted

I am a partisan on this board, and this board only.  BigP links me admitting this every chance he gets, even dishonestly on other boards when he knows I will only use poetic license on THIS board. Some of my inaccuracies are unintentional, because I will hear a sound bite on the radio or television and then post it here, only to find out that I should have listened for the full context.  There are other times I will put a partisan slant on my posts just like you do.  It's all fun.  Why are Lefties so serious about politics?  Everybody here takes a side and slants their posts in favor of their side.  If you are saying that YOU never distort the facts in favor of the Dems, go back and read some of your posts.   We all post information in a way that appears most favorable to the side we have chosen, just like the news media does.  As long as everyone admits to being partisan, I don't see what's wrong with that.  Take posts with a grain of salt if they are contrary to your own beliefs about a topic.

…Joe Biden will be pushing up daisies after falling off his bike one too many times.  

 
Repeat the line.  

 
Joe Biden will be pushing up…

that Trump can still drive a golf ball 300 yards, but Biden can't ride a bicycle without falling off or climb stairs without stumbling?  There are pros on the Senior Tour that can't do that.  It just shows that there is NOTHING that Biden can do better than Trump, so which one should be Prez?

He claims (without a link) that Trump can drive the ball 300 yards.  But Lexi Thompson said he can only hit it 250.  And that was six years ago!
https//www.golfchannel.com/article/golf-central-blog/how-far-can-trump-drive-ball-lexi-has-answer
Not only can't Trump "still" drive a golf ball 300 yards, he NEVER could drive a ball 300 yards.  

 
Mr. Poetic License has written 380 reviews.  How many of those are real and how many are fake?  Don't you find it a fitting comparison that someone who lies so easily about how far Trump can drive a golf ball would also lie about how many K-hookers he has fucked?

Posted By: BigPapasan
Re: Mr. Poetic License likes to exaggerate numbers...
He claims (without a link) that Trump can drive the ball 300 yards.  But Lexi Thompson said he can only hit it 250.  And that was six years ago!  
 https//www.golfchannel.com/article/golf-central-blog/how-far-can-trump-drive-ball-lexi-has-answer  
 Not only can't Trump "still" drive a golf ball 300 yards, he NEVER could drive a ball 300 yards.    
   
   
 Mr. Poetic License has written 380 reviews.  How many of those are real and how many are fake?  Don't you find it a fitting comparison that someone who lies so easily about how far Trump can drive a golf ball would also lie about how many K-hookers he has fucked?
Wooooow and Nicky thinks he is stalked and the Banned guy we shall not mention thought he was stalked, I gotta say your hatred for CDL is neck and neck with your hatred of Trump so there is TDS we are all familiar with and now there is CDS and you sir have both! In spades... maybe even Triplicate.

I'm so scared.
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!
You so phunny.

If CDL didn't LIE so much, his posts wouldn't have to be fact-checked.

 
You gullible righties don't bother fact-checking.  You believe everything Trump says so why wouldn't you believe everything CDL posts?  What fools these righties be!

"Pick any review of mine of any girl you want, and name one thing I said that I got wrong about the  girl, her menu, her location, her incall setup, or anything else I described in my review."  So far, NO ONE has been able to find a single false statement in ANY of my reviews.  The reviews are real, BigP is a fake, with two reviews, one that is fake.  One of the alleged participants told me the session never happened.  That leaves him with ONE review in 15+ years.  Is it real?  Who knows and who cares?  The lady is so old now she dropped off the radar.  

 
In fact, he corrected a profile a few weeks ago to get 2 days of free VIP on a girl he never saw, and said her language was English.  I've seen her and her primary language is Thai, which he didn't mention.  I COMPLETELY made a fool out of him on the GD board.  Maybe putting up the wrong language for a provider is HIS way to exercise a little poetic license.  Lol However, his does damage, because they mislead customers, mine are just for shits and giggles on politics.   Every time I bitch-slap him, his derangement just intensifies. He should be worrying about his blood pressure, not me.  

In fact, I've never even read one. They don't interest me.  
BUT....I have successfully called bullshit on numerous posts of yours which I've busted for their many lies, inaccuracies and distortions.  
Hell, it's your stock in trade. You've even admitted some of it. You might as well own it because everyone else here does.

I am a partisan on this board, and this board only.  BigP links me admitting this every chance he gets, even dishonestly on other boards when he knows I will only use poetic license on THIS board. Some of my inaccuracies are unintentional, because I will hear a sound bite on the radio or television and then post it here, only to find out that I should have listened for the full context.  There are other times I will put a partisan slant on my posts just like you do.  It's all fun.  Why are Lefties so serious about politics?  Everybody here takes a side and slants their posts in favor of their side.  If you are saying that YOU never distort the facts in favor of the Dems, go back and read some of your posts.   We all post information in a way that appears most favorable to the side we have chosen, just like the news media does.  As long as everyone admits to being partisan, I don't see what's wrong with that.  Take posts with a grain of salt if they are contrary to your own beliefs about a topic.

But you fail to make the distinction between my admittedly partisan posts which are almost always ACCURATE and based on what I consider to be reasonable and rational journalism, and your distortions or statements of so-called "facts" that have NOTHIG behind them at all. Hence your nickname, Can't Do Links.

They may APPEAR to be accurate from the perspective of a Socialist mindset, but they are still not absolute facts.  They are debatable opinions that allow those who have a different perspective can argue different facts.  Most of the news media is partisan these days, so just because the NYT makes a statement WITH THEIR OPINION, it does not make it an absolute fact.  Otherwise, Trump being charged and convicted on the Russian hoax would have been a fact, because that's how it was presented by the Times.

As always, you dodge and divert. What I SAID was you often mis-state things and are demonstrably WRONG. And many times you actually admit it. You even admit to lying. That's what I was referring to, so you might as well admit it and stop your diversions and smoke screens.
This has ZERO to do with OPINION and you've even admitted it. So stop weaseling about it.

But Biden’s approval average is a record low. Lower than Carter and Trump. They were both one term presidents, and Biden will be one too.

Biden won’t finish his one term… with Kamal leaving banana peels all over the west wing…

Posted By: BigPapasan

Only 37% said he should run again.  
 http://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1982/09/17/reagan-should-not-seek-second-term-majority-believes/4ccc2a56-1693-469d-af51-1368fd0fc649/  
   
   
 Two years later Reagan won FORTY-NINE states and the most electoral votes EVER.
The difference between Reagan and Biden is night and day to put it mildly.

Night and day. I laughed out loud when BigPapaFail tried to make the comparison.

BPS's comparison was NOT about the relative merits of Reagan's and Biden's Presidencies, as you've implied. It was ONLY about their standing in the polls going into their re-election campaigns. But you, in your intellectually bankrupt way, pretended he did. That's called a lie.
But if you wanna talk about Reagan, I'm game. For example, in his second term Reagan was clearly suffering from he early effects of Alzheimers. No one seriously disagrees with that. He was so out of it that Poindexter and Ollie North were able to hijack our foreign policy and get into the totally illegal Iran/Contra affair.
Reagan was, at best, a genial joke with a reputation that was undeserved.

Posted By: inicky46
Re: I'd tell you not to be a horse's ass but you can't help yourself.
BPS's comparison was NOT about the relative merits of Reagan's and Biden's Presidencies, as you've implied. It was ONLY about their standing in the polls going into their re-election campaigns. But you, in your intellectually bankrupt way, pretended he did. That's called a lie.  
 But if you wanna talk about Reagan, I'm game. For example, in his second term Reagan was clearly suffering from he early effects of Alzheimers. No one seriously disagrees with that. He was so out of it that Poindexter and Ollie North were able to hijack our foreign policy and get into the totally illegal Iran/Contra affair.  
 Reagan was, at best, a genial joke with a reputation that was undeserved.
"Blasphemy OHHHH YOU'LL SMOKE A TURD IN HELL FOR THAT ! ! !"  

Name the Movie BUT it applies nicely here. Reagan did not have Alzheimer's while in office.  STOP "crying wolf, ER I mean LYING"

From the Article  

Let’s put it clearly and simply: there is no truth to the notion of Ronald Reagan having Alzheimer’s during his presidency. Any piece of information that claims this is either taken out of context or is an outright lie from those who simply ignore history and know nothing about medicine.

Ask Ed Meese, President Reagan’s closest adviser, what he thought of President Reagan’s health. There will be nothing about Alzheimer’s. Ask others who worked closely with the President. There will be nothing. Ask for doctor’s notes or physicals or anything that would’ve meticulously been kept. What is there? Nothing. That’s how much truth there is to the canard. Reagan went to the Bethesda Naval Hospital each year for extensive testing, and each year of his presidency he passed with flying colors.

Following his presidency, he went to the Mayo Clinic for extensive annual exams starting in 1989 and was given an annual test for dementia and mental deterioration. Each year, he passed the exam without showing any signs of dementia beyond normal aging until his disease was diagnosed and revealed in 1994.

Those who want to use Reagan’s sad illness, the onset of which did not occur until a full five years after leaving office, for their own reasons or for political gain cannot seem to help it. They want to use a man’s disease to discredit a president who even those of a different political persuasion, such as former President Barack Obama, have looked up to.

‘No evidence’
Is there any medical evidence, doctors’ notes, counseling reports or any other information indicating that President Reagan suffered mentally in any way at any time in office? No. In fact, Dr. Lawrence Altman, longtime New York Times medical correspondent, looked for just such evidence and found none.

Oh, right, Snopes is a Commie rag, just like the Times. Or any other source that tells you sometime you don't want to believe....
Bottom line, it may be true but it's not totally provable. But a lot of people who talked to him during that time thought he was ga-ga.

Posted By: inicky46
Re: BWAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!  You want us to take Ed Meese's medical opinion????? LOLOLOL!
You are officially dumber than a box of rocks.
Nope even your commie rags medical corespondent , Dr. Lawrence Altman, “ longtime New York Times medical correspondent” in case you missed it the first time, I realize your getting old and mighta misplaced your 2.5 readers. Plus’s this is a CNN (commie news network article so hey you have to accept these sources as they are your faves!  

And you missed the movie quote 🙄  

PS stop plagerizin  

What's "plagerizin?" It seems that no only don't you know how to spell it, you don't even know what it IS.
And what's "2.5 readers?" I don't know. Don't have any either.

Register Now!