We expect great things from you in the future.

I so strongly support gun control.

-- Modified on 11/28/2009 11:17:45 AM

OK RWU. Please educate us on where you're going with this.

-- Modified on 11/28/2009 11:26:05 AM

...started a new thread accidently.

As always, RWU can't admit when he's wrong.

The person to whom I referred knows (or will know) exactly what I meant.

I apologize for your confusion.

-- Modified on 11/29/2009 12:07:09 AM

Boy you guys must either really be bored, or as thick as one of the fat broads on the GD board. lmao

LMAO.  It was worth it to be away for three daze, to log on, and to see that jed has spread his usual confusion  throughout the board, and engendered some ill-will to boot.

your way out is to attack the person. Unless you’d like me to pastes links to several examples in just the last 30 days, let it go.

and razor-sharp observations for a larger and, it is to be hoped, a more attentive audience?

When I call your bullshit you just ignore it or start calling names. When you claim I’ve made a mistake and I prove you wrong you just ignore it or again, out come the names.

...last 30 days.  I have 81 total posts, including aliases.  How many are attacks?  I can wait until you get your Flomax refilled.

...been sent to the intended recipient privately.  The purpose of starting a thread is to post a topic of general interest which can be discussed by all members of the board.

Instead we are subjected to the whims of RWU who decided his PM to an unnamed hobbyist was so important that we all should read it.

Or maybe he's a solipsist and we're all creations of his imagination.

It’s about admitting errors.

Let’s recap how this exchange started. . .

1) You claimed I can’t admit when I’m wrong.

2) I asked if you really wanted to start a pissing contest (presumably about admitting errors, what else?).

3) You then tried to turn the conversation to my supposedly negative attitude.

4) I then asserted that was an example of how you turn things personal when you no longer have an argument that can be supported.

5) As much as I’d like to take the time to post examples of your ad Hominem attacks, that’s not what this was all about. But here are several examples of you losing an argument, only to walk away without saying anything.

You asked for examples:

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=107054&boardID=39&page=

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=106926&boardID=39&page=

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=106841&boardID=39&page=

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=106740&boardID=39&page=

You’re second only to willy in walking away from failed arguments, but at least you haven’t been correcting people’s spelling lately.

...your posts about losing an argument, which was not at issue, but all of a sudden change your mind about showing examples of my ad hominem attacks which you promised you would do but now say "that's not what this was all about".  Great, you make the rules, change them and then claim you won the argument because the other guy walked away.

I prefer discussion, even arguments, but you prefer to 'win'.  I get tired of being Sisyphus to your boulder.

Otherwise read your very first post in this thread and accept the fact it was about taking responsibility for mistakes. As was each subsequent post you made except for the ones where you changed the subject.

You prefer arguments or discussion only until it’s shown that your facts are incorrect, then you run away.

...to everyone on TER.  NOT!  Our back and forth belongs in PMs, as did your original post.

and then you get all defensive and whiny when I defend myself.