Politics and Religion

Fani Willis AND staff must step aside - DISQUALIFIED
durran421 35 Reviews 378 reads
posted

Step aside crook, step aside......
Someone else wants that job of hers too. Someone with integrity and values. She's DONE!

well Well WELL them geese are almost cooked!

The ruling is that EITHER Fani Willis OR Nathan Wade has to go.  

 
Gawd you’re dumb!!!

It was, as Durran noted, it wasn’t just an either/or between  just Fani Willis and her now ex-lover. If you had taken time to throughly research before posting, you would know the judge gave Fani two options. Durran correctly noted one of the options:

Fani Willis and her entire staff (which Durran noted)
or  
Wade

The subject line of durran's post says:
"Fani Willis AND staff must step aside - DISQUALIFIED"
In the body of the post, he writes: "Step aside crook, step aside...She's DONE!",  

 
durran clearly thought that was the ONLY option, otherwise he would have mentioned that Willis could shit can Wade and remain on the case.  Instead, he was celebrating Willis's departure from the case, as was his fellow idiot  LostSon.  In your zeal to defend your fellow stupid, stupid righties you come off looking as stupid as they are.

In addition to calling for removal. the judge also called out Fani Willis’s atrocious behavior:

This finding is by no means an indication that the Court condones this tremendous lapse in judgment or the unprofessional manner of the District Attorney’s testimony during the evidentiary hearing."

would choose and his link obviously spelled out both options. Frankly, it is hard to disagree with him, unless you find that Fani was a credible witness which I did not.

           The problem is that, even if  Trump is convicted as appears inevitable, he has a built in appeal issue apart from the merits that an actual conflict existed. And if Wade is canned - which is surely the next step - he might not be so helpful  to Willis down the line.  Plus there is nothing stopping the defense from continuing to obtain evidence that the relationship existed before Wade was hired, that Fani committed perjury, and that she accepted benefits. Then they can file another motion to disqualify based on newly found evidence.

I think Fani should fire Wade and then recuse herself and hire a clean special prosecutor to take over to eliminate, or try to eliminate, this issue before a jury is seated..

...crawls out of the woodwork to make a fool of himself again.  The only reason you're defending durran is because you're butt hurt that I kick your ass regarding the law time and time again.

 
And remember when you posted this:
"...the judge can disqualify Fani for the mere appearance of a conflict of interest"
Of course you were WRONG.  There WAS an appearance of a conflict of interest but that is not enough, BY LAW, to remove Fani Willis.  Crawl back into the woodwork and stay there this time.
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/unfortunately-lester-is-correct-439104?frmSearch=1#439104

Marikod again embarrasses BigPapasan, and BigP resorts to ad hominem insults and posting useless links that in this instance actually highlighted another time he teed up and delivered a BigPapaFail.  
After Marikod points out

Yeah I think Durran was saying that was the option he would choose and his link obviously spelled out both options.
BigPapasan returns with zero rebuttal points and only insults. It was clear to everyone (except the spastically dense BigP) reading the thread what Durran meant. It’s odd that a man who posts more links than anyone in the history of TER would jump on the post before reading Durran’s accompanying link. Instead of exposing himself as a fool, he could have silently thought to himself, “This confused me, but now that I’ve read the link, I understand what Durran was saying.”  

Lacking any rebuttal points, BigPapasan went straight to insults.


crawls out of the woodwork
fool
butt hurt
perpetual first-year law student
Aside from insults, BigPapasan didn’t have much but to post one of his trademark search results.  In this instance, he searched “show me a time where I told Marikod he was wrong” and voila, he posts this for us:
To disqualify Fanl Willis, the indicted defendants have to prove an actual “conflict  of interest,”
Sadly for BigPapasan, his search backfired and linked us to  another instance of Marikod professionally, yet politely (hopefully BigP is taking notes) embarrassing BigPapasan. Scroll down from BigP’s search result one posting and we find Marikod’s reply.
Unfortunately, Lester is correct
that the judge can disqualify Fani for the mere appearance of a conflict of interest…

… You are confusing a pretrial motion to disqualify with the standard for reversal of a criminal conviction for a conflict of interest. There an actual conflict is required.

BigPapasan’s reply? Zip. Nada. Radio listening silence.  As is his modus operandi, BigP disappears for a week or so after another BigPapafail, and this fail was especially painful for BigP.  Once he dips out of a post and declines an opportunity to rebut, he thinks his gaffe will be forgotten, not realizing that his posts are still there for everyone to see.  

It’s clear that BigP holds a deep professional jealousy towards Marikod, so much so that BigP is reduced to spewing personal insults and random links that sometimes even disproves BigP’s own point. BigP throws around 1st Year Law student like an insult when it’s clear he couldn’t competently handle the duties of an entry level paralegal.

That is exactly what the judge said the day before I made the post, and exactly what he said in his opinion:  

 

“This Court finds that it can – and indeed must –consider the appearance of  impropriety as a basis for a state prosecutors disqualification….Unlike an actual conflict, the finding of an appearance of impropriety does not demand automatic disqualification.”

So the judge can disqualify for an appearance. The judge chose a lesser remedy here. But he could have disqualified Fani for the appearance alone. (Really bad idea for you to put BY LAW in caps-you are underlining your own blunder). So Lester was right all along - and you were wrong along.

I would suggest you consult Lester for legal advice before you make your next legal post.  You could learn from him.

But don’t let that stop you from trying to cover up your blunder with name calling again.

The thing to learn here is this. Lester and Marikod made good points, and have a good view of the implications to Fani as far as the law is concerned.  
Bigp is more of a, "I'm not a real layer but I did stay in a Holiday Inn Express last night..... "kind of lawyer. Like the "Wish" version of layers if you will.  
Now, If he had opened his eyes all the way and read everything he would have learned that I mentioned someone is after that Fulton County DA position. Fani's reputation and credibility with the residents of GA is in the toilet therefore, she is DONE! Do you see now bigp? We can't spell it out any better than that.

"In addition to calling for removal."  The judge did NOT specifically remove Willis from the case as durran claimed.  Your vague wording shows what a weasel you are.

I said the obvious perjury would cause the judge to disqualify Fani.  But the judge said, yeah, there was obvious perjury, but blah blah blah, no disqualification.  Proving once again that as cynical as you are, you are never cynical enough.

...it has been accepted by Fani Willis.  She can now remain on the case.  durran, LostSon and CKS are not DISQUALIFIED from continuing to post on P&R.  Their dumb posts are welcome to show just how stupid Trumptards are.

At the time I posted he had not stepped down. Pay attention big boy. I pointed out the either or, your just too fat fingered to press the link and read it.
Not that he has stepped aside, I STILL think she will be removed from the case. We'll see.  
Everyone is some type of "tard" to BIIIIIGDATTTTY

Your OP subject line CLEARLY states: "Fani Willis AND staff must step aside - DISQUALIFIED" and in the body of your post you say: "She's DONE!"  No either/or, you were celebrating Willis's removal and were too stupid to understand your own link.  You didn't know she could remain on the case until I pointed it out to your pointy head.

 
What does "must" mean?  What does "She's DONE!" mean?  Why can't you be man enough to admit you were wrong?
Lester did but you keep on looking like an idiot.

Ain't no way you're that dense that we have to literally spell this out for you. Ain't nooooo way.
Or....then again, maybe you are. Carry on then.

-- Modified on 3/15/2024 4:48:32 PM

followme34 reads

sick perverted individual now you are fantasizing about other men ejaculating, and loving it .

 
you may very well be beyond help.

Posted By: followme
Re: dumbshit1020 you are a very
sick perverted individual now you are fantasizing about other men ejaculating, and loving it .  
   
   
 you may very well be beyond help.
Oh he is beyond help!

Posted By: gentleguy1020
Re: Hey rat 🐀!! She is not done! You moron eom
Seriously you said you were done posting here but yet here you are… 🙄😐🙄

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/politics-and-religion-39/i-am-done-posting-on-the-board-congrats-really--440038?page=

Are you like one of these idiots that says “I’m going to move out of the United States if Trump gets elected!” And then you never do?  

PS Fani Willis is fucked! Hide watch dumbguy1020, HIDE AND WATCH 😳

Your take an his post was almost as bad as BigPapasan’s.

The future of Willis remains precarious, at best.

with an eye toward their own future would be crazy to take this case.  Will Fani have to prosecute this case herself?   Either way, it cannot stay on the same timeline, so the clock should run out on the prosecution and Trump will be President.  

-- Modified on 3/18/2024 3:12:29 PM

If she does have to prosecute it herself,  it'll be a disaster (for her) no matter what.  
Another dem fuk up. They put all their hopes on one of, if not the most, crooked DA's in the country.

Fani's screw ups have ZERO to do with the facts of the case.

Excuse the 2nd mental patient that posts here above. I don't think he realizes we ignore him now.  

But in other news.......
Fani is far from.out of the woods as we know.

According to the article, this recently approved motion to appeal could add 65 days to the calendar, and that’s not even figuring an appeal to the Georgia Supreme Court.

The second key point in the article is that the move to disqualify Fani based on her racist speech at the church is gaining steam.  

It’s looking more and more like her goose is cooked.

Nice job of ignoring me, pinhead.
Gawd you’re dumb..

Register Now!