And I'm shakin' my head at what I've read there.
Anyone else read them tonight?
Yeah - I saw those - he is apparently implying these 2 known ladies are cool with his vasectomy as enough protection for bbfs... Because apparently you can't get an std from a vasectomy??!!
Not that BS needs to be called, but I'm calling it here! Then again, this is all for entertainment purposes only... Right?and should be removed by TER without any questions asked.
This really should be a no brainer for TER, I submitted problem reports on both
I agree - I no there is a LOT of BS in reviews but that is pretty clearly out of bounds...
I think it falls in the category of submission #2: "Be fair and honest in your reviews -- this is what the providers do for a living. PLEASE BE WARNED: We will not post any review that slams or denigrates a provider..." I imagine most would agree that brazenly FALSE implications like these indeed "denigrates" the ladies -This is not only ignorant, it is bad for the hobby. TER, take them down, please... Notwithstanding, there are no law breakers here!
Can I ask, what did say in your problem report? That no one does bareback in Phoenix. TER should have deferred the two reviews since this guy is new and he claimed bbfs. They could have verified what actually happened with the providers. But TER ain't what it used to be.
-- Modified on 9/12/2014 4:24:52 AM
-- Modified on 9/12/2014 9:36:48 AM
Ha! It always amazes me that everytime I submit a review I get denied because too short and not enough details. Not sure if this guy's reviews can get any shorter...but guess it qualifies for too much detail.
same here... or I have mentioned that a lady is going to school to study a particular subject, or has a particular type of job on the side (say a dancer) - don't mention locations or anything - and that gets rejected... go figure.
Clearly I did not state that it never happens. I did however recommend they look into it as the reviews were highly questionable and could have a significant negative impact on a person's livelihood.
Shill - you are right on both counts - I'm sure there are probably providers out there somewhere that provide BBFS - but as aguyinak stated - that wasn't the point: it could impact their reputations and thereby - their livelihood.
Yes, it COULD have happened - anything is possible... but based on the ladies' reputations, screening requirements, etc., the likelihood of an "unknown" gentleman convincing 2 different highly rated ladies with longevity in the business, to schedule an appointment and then further convincing BOTH of them to go bareback simply because the guy had been "snipped" - seems REALLY unlikely. So, to your other point - it seems like TER should have questioned it instead of posting such a claim, but unless the problem report comes from the ladies, I'm pretty sure the reviews will remain. it would've been interesting to hear some ladies' points of view on this...