END OF MESSAGE

END OF MESSAGE

with the supposed poor quailty attribute of too much self description.
As long as a reviewer posts truthfully, with pertinent details relayed tactfully (or at least as tactfully as can be considering this is a review of a sexual encounter), then I'm not sure why frequency of review is a bad thing.  The more honest reviews out there the better - even if a review just confirms a majority opinion on a lady, it does help solidify that consensus, and it's  also good for ladies to keep getting new reviews so there are "fresher" reviews for potential clients to read.

you make a lot of sense... I agree frequency is not at all tied to quality... I've come across all types... those who are prolific and are great at conveying what you need... those that like to write of their exploits but add nothing in terms of giving the rest of us a glimpse into what the gal is really like... then there are the ones who only write now and then... either because they only see a gal now and then, or only write when they feel it adds something... and again... these are both good and bad in terms of the content.  

As for the OP... the key to credibility is not the number... but the content... including grammar, spelling and paragraph breaks... It is hard to take someone serious when they write poorly.

Truthful and tactful-- great attributes even if you're a horndog who reviews every possible encounter. I don't agree with the idea that a 'good" reviewer has to review sparingly... what's the point of that?  

than the original one being asked.
In a perfect world, ladies would only have gentleman who would give them a 10/10 submit reviews!  

But I really do understand how these are a two-edged sword for ladies: on one hand, having critiques of your looks and intimate details of sexual encounters with strangers recounted - in sometimes hurtful or unflattering terms - on the internet where potentially anyone could see, could be unnerving or disturbing, BUT on the otherhand, these are the lifeblood which make this whole little system work (at least for the majority of hobbiests and providers).  I suppose it's a little like the love-hate relationship between celebrities and the paparazzi.  Celebrities need that publicity, yet they can't really control them and often feel violated.

...you are right, trying to get that "glimpse into what the gal is really like" is really what this all boils down to!

You are so right Julias. Ive spoken to many providers who don't like reviews for different reasons. Some don't like the graphic nature of the review and others dont like the fact that if they dont offer trips to the islands, or drink milk they will never be considered a 10 on performance. I personally dont like the Greek islands and frankly, I like to stay put when I have my happy ending. It feels better for me. So, with that being said, why would a great woman, who is attractive and showed me a great time get just a hot time for example? That just sounds so bad to me, even though I really really enjoyed myself and was smiling from ear to ear when I left.  

Sometimes I think a guy does not know how to articulate his emotions thru text and gets a lower performance score than he chose, because after reading his words you want to yawn LOL. I would rather write a review to tell other guys that the place was clean, that she was clean and that her personality was pleasant and she made me feel comfortable, and excited. Id like to say that I felt safe and that communicating with her was easy, that she looked just like her photos, not that I personally thought she was a 6, or a 10. A check box for visits to the Greek islands is all I need to know! Thats a yes or know deal...I personally dont want to hear a detailed analysis of your driving on dirt roads you know what I mean? Okay...got it! Since that means little to me, the 10 performance is kind of something I take with a grain of salt.