Just read several reviews of ratings seven and over.
1- No dfk
2-No bbj
3-no finger insertion or daty
Really you got to be kidding
Peace out
Read my reviews of Alana, Elizabeth or monica !
without the things that you mentioned. While I agree with that and have adhered to it, I do feel thata perfectly executed covered blowjob is superior to a poorly executed BBBJ.
Guys are different, so what turns one guy on will not turn on another. The TER rating system seems designed to remove the aspect of personal preference from the higher ratings, some staff that post reviews obviously let some slip throug that do not meet the guidelines. I do know that a couple of months ago, I was so excited after a double that my rating violated the rule, the staff person that posted the review adjusted the rating to comform with the rule. I was upset initially, but now feel that the staff person did exactly what he or she should have done.
I found out one thing. A hot lady had better not be standing anywhere near a bottle of strawberry syrup with you in town.
But on the subject of scores. One guy's wonder can be another guy's disappointment. I will use three of my experiences to make my point. I saw a highly rated pornstar after joining TER. Her performance ratings were all 10. My time with her was the worse time that I have ever spent with a woman, she smoked when I requested that she not, she faked moans of pleasure that disgusted me and she had been drinking heavily. I did not do a review of her, but noticed that the reviews of her afterward were all 10s again. Did she just have a bad day with me or were the reviewers taken by her status and being too generous in their score. I do know that as a consequence of my experience with her, I will never see a pornstar again. My second example is that I saw a GFE (other's description, not mine), that had huge performance scores, north of 9. All other reviewers rated her as unrushed and pleasurable. Not only was her session with me rushed, it was no pleasure for me, I was disappointement in many aspects of her presentation and wondered what the hell other guys saw. I chose not to review her under the belief that her day with me was a bad one for her. My last example is that I recently had a double with two young ladies. One was reviewed, although I could not find any reviews before seeing her. If I had been able to read the reviews before seeing her, I would have not bothered to call her. My session with her and her friend left me with a warm feeling inside that lasted for days, it was one of the best sessions that I have had in the last year, although everything was covered and no on-mouth kissing or DATY happened. Interestingly, the two reviews of her after mine were glowingly admiring of her.
To end this, I am glad that you had good experiences, but you should not expect that guys that look for different things in a woman will agree with your assessment.
-- Modified on 1/15/2005 10:24:34 AM
Maybe a new catagory of overall performance is needed. But the guidelines have already been setup by TER and are not to be overlooked when writing a review. They are not subjective if a provider performs in a certain manner that she deserves what ever rating is required by that performance. If she does not perform than just because you may have enjoyed the session does not mean you have the right to increase her score. How can the rest of us decide whether a provider is someone we would like to see if the scores of performance are not standardized.
bm
-- Modified on 1/15/2005 7:48:25 PM
-- Modified on 1/15/2005 7:49:40 PM
That's why I have previously recommended a new category - Overall Experience which would be totally subjective.
Appearance - subjective
Performance - should be totally objective. Was the service offered/provided? If yes then award points. If not then do not award points. Currently lots of 9s and 10s given that do not meet TER criteria especially from first time reviewers.
Overall Experience - subjective. Gives reviewers the ability to give high scores even if performance score is a 7 or any other score less than 10. Maybe only a CBJ and mish but if it was wonderful give it a 10 but the Performance should be a 7.
That's why I check the reviewer as well as the provider. If the reviewers is first-timer, I ignore it. If the reviewer gives everyone high scores or someone that is consider average, I ignore it.
This can be tricky....I've been victim to a number of BS reviews.
I feel it is a little infair to disreguard first time reviewers. I seem to get a lot of newbies. I have no clue why. They Tend to land here or city**** and find me.
Then they say they want to write a review or they just to it. Just because it isa first time review does not mean they do not follow the board or the rating systems. I have seen many first time reviews for ATF's on this board. But I wouldn't disreguard them....
Thats just my thoughts though. but I am barely worth the effort so you might have stopped reading already, lol
AngieRenee
XOXOXOXOXO
I said that you and Shannon of Julie's were the only two providers that I really wanted to DATY, so I remember doing it. For many of my 9 and 10 providers, at most a few licks pour encourager les autres. How can you say "I am barely worth the effort so you might have stopped reading already"
When I session, I don't have a checklist of items to do so that I can meet all the criteria of a TER review. For example, while BBBJ is critical to me, many times I don't DATY and most times I don't DFK. Hence, I extrapolate. There were only two providers that were so unique that I HAD to DATY--Shannon and AngieRenee--to taste and pleasure them--not me. Most of my 10 providers--particularly the ones who do Asian and swallow, I assume allow DATY and DFK.
If a provider specifies no DFK, no DATY, then you can assume no BBBJ and no Asian. I don't know what reviews you are reading, but if DFK and DATY are not mentioned, the provider could still warrant a 10. Only if the provider firmly said no DATY and no DFK, then you can assume no BBBJ. Hence--7.
The TER rule for reviews does not require that you partake in the additional services that allow for a performance review of over 7. Only that they be available. The rules also make clear that just because those additional services are available odesn't mean you increase the ratings. Of course if you did not ask about or were not offered a particulare service, not being a mind reader or keeping a checklist makes it a judgment call about those additional services. That is why I always politely try to obtain that information to include in my reviews. My effort to provide good information to others.
Performance ratings are not "objective" as someone stated (although the suggestion of a category of "Overall Experience" is a good one). A provider may offer DFK and BBBJ and still not measure up in one's opinion in those or other areas and that should be reflected in a rating. I believe that is why the reviews must be read. I recently had a fabulous time with a beautiful provider. She did a CBJ so there was no subjectivity about that service and she later told me she did not like to kiss. Anal was not available. Therefore, I could only give her a 7. But I had a great time, would definitely repeat and would highly recommend to someone not looking for a GFE.
By the way, DATY and finger insertion do not count to raise the rating from a 7. For those who have forgotten, I copy below the TER policy for performance ratings.
"In order to keep our performance ratings consistent, we set up the following system: An escort provider may only eligible to earn up to a 7, unless she also performs the following during a session: Kisses With Tongue, Bare-Back Blow Job, Really Bi, Anal Sex, or More than One Guy. The addition of each offering will raise the score she is eligible for by one point.
This does not mean she earns extra points for performing the service; just that she is now eligible for a higher score. Her maximum eligible score is based on what is offered, not what is taken. You may or may not be interested in the ?extra? services she has, but the fact she offers them makes her eligible for the higher score."