let's say the police & prosecutor find no one was under age & no one was using drugs at Julies during her trial ..
THEN BOOM...
Jury says to the prosecutor NOT GULITY ...
that would be a heck of a statment. One can only hope.
Here's something I dont get. How come every article written in the papers about Julie mentions how she takes care of pets and strays and her animals/pets were her concern that she couldnt turn herself in ? Is that suppose to show a different side of her ? Is it a legal trick or does the paper have no other info on her ?
I like how they say she has a heart of gold and then discuss how she takes care of pets and strays. For some reason they are trying to paint this picture of her. The newspapers should stick to the factual evidence at hand and let the court decide what type of character witness she is.
I hear she does animal rescue. Sounds like a nice lady. I hope that story about the 15yr working there is BS.
Police sensationalized and justified their bust of Julie's by stating, "Under AGE runaway girl worked at Julie's".
But as you said, if the under age and drug charge do NOT stick, it will be a major victory for the Hobbyists and service Providers.
Even if other chages, such as money laundering, sticks, Police and DA will think twice before wasting tax payer's money on going after service providers.
I don't think most New Yorkers think prostitution as public hazzard #1.
