Three reviews in the past few days mention bareback sex, two vaginal, one anal.
-- Modified on 6/29/2015 11:12:30 AM-- Modified on 6/29/2015 12:48:57 PM
Until they get sick or get their significant other sick! You can hobby all you want but be mindful of the long term consequences of your actions. I do believe though, that since some irresponsible providers offer it, some gentlemen will take up on the offer. Nothing is certain in life but at least take calculated risks.
I could never understand how either party is willing to take this risk.
If I was researching a lady I was interested in meeting and the reviews indicated this activity, she was become an immediate NO GO.But why not post a link to the reviews to help the rest of us out? I'm sure there are many that would prefer to avoid this type of provider.
I frequently saw a provider who I always had a great connection with who whitelisted me. Until, one day in a heated session she tried intercourse sans raincoat. I freaked out and of course refused and the session went down hill from there. I chalked it up to her being lost in the moment but decided it would be best if I didn't see her again. A few months down the line I had a provider who decided not to see me after screening. When I asked for a honest answer as to why not, she told me because I was whitelisted by a provider who is known for her unsafe practices. The point is, if I knew this beforehand I would've avoided her like the plague.
I don't know why people make references to reviews without providing links. Why bother?
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1729286 http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1729134 http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=172947and this is why I check the forums! I had one of those providers on my to see list.... that's a heaping dose of noooope now.
But it does make me wonder if these guys exaggerate or if these reviews are even real
From my experience dealing with all kind of people, I give the benefit of the doubt, Gina and Samantha are professionals.
Don't make any sense, IMHO
Let's hope because I had Samantha on my radar
-- Modified on 6/30/2015 10:51:02 PM
Heh. The first reviewer says the condom prevented rear entry, but it went in just fine sans raincoat. That's some close tolerance!
After BB anal, she might just BE.....
Yikes!
Don't make any sense, IMHO
First, thanks to garvin_fred101 for posting the actual reviews. Because I hate cryptic posts.
First Review: >http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1729286 "It really felt like I wasn't wearing a raincoat because she was so wet." Saying it feels like you're not wearing a raincoat means you are wearing a raincoat and it feels like you're not. Second Review >http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1729134 "She then hopped onto me reverse CG." First, it's certainly not the first time that BBFS and Gina have been in the same sentence. No way to know if those rumors are true without seeing her. Second, lots of reviews mention entering or hopping on without mentioning the cover. The fact that there isn't a line in the review that says, "And then we paused to pun on a condom." does not mean that a condom did not go on at some point. I am willing to bet at least 1/3 of reviews don't mention a cover even when it's there. Third Review > http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1729476 "In the heat of the moment, she let me enter her tight pussy bareback!" Now that's pretty unequivocal. So we have one. One, not three.After the thread gained steam two of the posts were edited to remove the specific and detailed references to BB. You should have read the thread back on 6/30 and not today on 7/07.
I don't check TER every day.
Did you read all the comments after I posted the three reviews? Did you find it odd there were references to activity that you couldn't find? But you automatically assumed that people can't read. Be careful next time you see a thread with a hot button topic that is several days old. Not everything is what it seems. Peace.