Today on 7/1/03, the first 5 reviews on the NY 212 TER review guide just happen to be all 5 Julie girls. All different girls-all five. Explain that?
I know, Julie oes such a great job that everytime someone sees her girls they run to their computer to write about the experience. Total BS- take a statistical sampling and see what the chances are that would happen- NIL.
Lets see the times posted so we can see that the reviews were posted hours apart, not minutes apart, because we all know that when 5 seperate guys all leave Julies at the same time they all reach their offices or homes at the exact same hour and immediately before saying hi to the wife and kids or shower from the NYC heat they stop at the computer to tell the rest of us how good it was?
Stop BS the public and get real. Thats called pandering and thats illegal in NYC either as a Madame or Board operator.
Now Julie is even a smarter biz women that most thought- she is using the cover website of cityvibe as the header so we the dumb hobbyists do not figure out except by the tel number or e mail address that its Julies. Alternating between Julies and Cityvibe-very smart but come on we are all not that naive.
reviews are fishy, Staff will find that out. That's what happened to a LA agency http://www.elitecompanions.net . Since TER is located in LA, there is no incentive for Staff to cover for Julie's.
Until then, why don't you resume the praise of your beloved Kama Sutra lady?
-- Modified on 7/1/2003 11:22:29 PM
What happened, did you have a bad experience at Julies?
You seem to be obsessed with Julies.
Read sara and jennifer's reviews, "julie" gave them 5's and 6's and talked about how the girls that left were much better....
She does play favorites doesn't she?
blur
in these posts have reviewed a bunch of other providers, not just julie's...
so your theory is that julie not only fakes her own reviews, she fills up the data base with good reviews of dozens of competing providers just to cover her tracks....
I've reported your complaints and concerns about julie and this unprecedented ruse she is pulling over on us, to the staff...
but i'm also very tired of this thread, and your hammering of the boards, our fellow members, providers who take advantage of the ad policy to get info i want to me, etc etc...so let's take a break while we wait for the news of the investigation to come back, eh?
blur
WL, Blur has nothing to do with the review process at TER. He is a volunteer moderators (and a damn good one) of some of our message boards. IF you have an issue with reviews, please email [email protected]
-- Staff
She certainly plays favorites especially when she is panning her 200 girls and playing up her 250 girls. Some of the staff have turned into dead wood but she needs staff so until she replaces them she pans them so the biz is directed to the higher priced talent.
Experiences vary by the talent, time of day and vol they saw, its just fair play that to fill a board daily with reviews that are obviously bogus based ion the volume and the sequence and the wording being similiar that its time to call a cheat a cheat or a smart biz women, your choice.
since you seem to feel the ones we post are somehow bogus.
on't go there, you fool!I've also thought that there is something phoney about the way the Julie reviews. It doesn't mean that Julies is worthless, just that there does to appear to be a scam here.
To Gregg1955:
Finally someone without myopia. That can see beyond the tip of his penis. Something does seem fishy and its not the girls at Juilies but the sequencial series of daily reviews of Julies Girls, one after another, day after day usually the top five posts on the review boards. And very rarely a bad one.
Has anyone seen the Citibank Visa card commercial on tv. It states that 77% of all merchandise bought is defective. Well the same has to be true in this hobby, so why are 90% of all Julie reviews glowingly great?
Now to anwer your questions from above, No I do not have or have had a problem with Julies girls, seen many but I like fair play and false revierws to promote business is the same as LE posting a sting at a place they own.
In taking a look at your reviews, you seem to be giving some high marks to other agencies.
Under your assumption, your reviews are suspect also.
whitelightning must be right, why bother writing reviews because they are all phony. What a crock o'shit.