See Mr Snyder today 1/28 has a doubles review up for two ladies he saw here . They according to their X account will arrive tomorrow . Probably safe and review may be close to expectations but not his first shill here on providers passing through Denver. Not the only shill reviewer from there.
She's also based in Denver
on TER and on other boards. Dani has been here before and she's fun. JCL saw her.
To me the issue is that his review showed up today early so was written yesterday and both X accounts have them arriving tomorrow.
That being said this reviewer and some others from Denver have done these same shill reviews and for the most part have been consistent with those that saw them later.
They are both real but his reviews are not. His reviews mentioned enjoying certain services such as DFK and BBBJ which are not both offered by both girls. My guess is that who ever is writing these reviews is in charge of marketing for the group.
Most often when Mr. Snyder posts a review, even when his is the ul/only review/ul, locations are Denver and Mpls, something that only makes sense if he's shilling.
It is not only him as I can pull out multiple handles of reviewers in this Denver Pipeline following the same pattern . All these introducttory shills of these “INDEPENDENT “ providers give those reviewers and providers more then just a little credibility. I could name some other reviewer handles but are easy to find if you cross reference . In the end many are good providers but ——
This time Snyder reviews an imaginary Bloomington encounter to shill for a provider's visit to Denver.
She says she's touring Minneapolis until 8 February, (and then Denver for 3 weeks). Problem is she posted the Mpls mythical tour announcement on Febraury 9th.
This brainless BS is driving me nuts. Am I OCD?
February 9th is also the date she joined Twitter apparently, and of her first post.
Twitter is the only add Snyder refs in the profile he creates with his review, though her Twitter didn't even exist at the supposed time of the encounter.
Same as my original posting shilling for the new and “Independent “ provider .
He is it the only one shilling for this group. Of course we have the same here with a few who are introducing the new talent or hyping the old but at least in both cases are real but locally you may not be able to schedule unless you have been “anointed” . Then we have at least one who seems to just hype the agency ladies and take issue with any others here especially those that would post.
Great F- - - - g way to build a community of trust and respect!
Thanks Lockstock
Years ago the big no no was that a sure way to get banished from this site for a provider and a reviewer was to use the same email . I am wondering why the original review mentioned at the top of this thread that I started and ones you just brought up are not pulled .
Just saying.
I don't think they have the manpower they used to have to watch things.