… is when two reviews for two different providers submitted by the same guy at the same time are the same, word for word. And at least one of the reviews differs on several important details compared to the provider’s usual reviews.
Someone needed some VIP days, it seems. 😒It might not make it on to the board but, here are the General Details (in other words publicly visible) from a review posted by Hersh54 in January
"I had seen Erika's ads for a while and decided to give her a try. The set up was easy through email and the location familiar. I was welcomed by an attractive young lady with very nice large tits. Erika showed my the bathroom and the room where we would be. I freshened up and went to the room."
and now here are the General Details from Littlebastard in a January review of the same provider
"I had seen Erika's ads for a while and decided to give her a try. The set up was easy through email and the location familiar. I was welcomed by an attractive young lady with very nice large tits. Erika showed my the bathroom and the room where we would be. I freshened up and went to the room."
… the second reviewer’s handle is accurate.
And it appears his copy has been removed.
… the second reviewer’s handle is accurate.
First, my review opening sentence of general details:
"Sage is brand new, eager, with a pretty smile and pretty body that got prettier the more I looked."
And now here is Littlebastard's review a couple of days later:
"Sage is brand new, eager, with a sexy smile and tight body that got me hornier the more I looked."
Plagiarism gets University Professors fired. But WTF will happen to the Little Bastard?
Not sure, but good chance they will make a life size replica of the most massive item to ever be erected in Minnesota and perhaps put it on display for tourist in some small town looking for legendary stature like Lil B himself? Only time will tell.
Agree. Is TER that desperate for reviews?? I have guys contact me and say that they gave up trying to do a review because TER can be such a stickler for the number ratings and also the "juicy" details, but then allow obvious fakes be published?
I agree too many fake reviews but then it comes to proof.
As for the rules on scoring they were enacted to slow down the score inflation.
As far as the details TER has relaxed the need to be as explicit as in the past but do require the narative to justify the scoring but not requiring the penthouse article they use to want.
IMHO they allow such generic blather that it is impossible to pin down decisively a fake.
I do feel they put too much on the provider to PROVE a session or act did it happen!!!
I see quite a few reviews that are so vague that you can't tell much of anything about what took place. As far as I know, TER will just change the number value on the performance score if the detailed description doesn't support it per their rules.
Back in the day I had a few reviews kicked back. You just have to resubmit them with the area of contention updated. I haven't done a review for a while, but I recall that finding the reason for the rejection was not in an obvious place to look.
When a Provider hasn't posted an ad for 2+ years and suddenly new reviews come out. Even if they have an ad currently it doesn't necessarily mean that they are active. I noticed at least 3 Ladies recently (1 or more is probably retired) and there are probably many more who have fake reviews. If you have 1 or 600 reviews, how many are made up? No way to confirm it really.
-- Modified on 2/2/2024 7:00:50 AM