Minnesota

Holding on 2nd review of the provider
Moonray 10130 reads
posted
1 / 3

I’ve been bad about writing reviews, but decided to start writing them last Wednesday after totally wasting my money on another unreviewed 3rd rate provider.  I would have had a lot more fun with a blow up doll.  No conversation.  No eye contact.  FS, but virtually nothing else allowed/offered.  She directs you to go straight to full service and hurry it up to get you out of there ASAP.  I didn’t even think it was possible for a session to be so impersonal, but I guess I was wrong.

Anyway, I submitted my review on Wednesday, but when I checked its status it says “Holding on 2nd review of the provider.”  Since when does there need to be more than one review of a provider before the provider gets listed in the reviews section?  I’ve seen many providers with a single review.  Considering that the vast majority of twin cites providers are unreviewed, it is quite likely that a second review will never be posted.  It is much more likely that additional reviews will follow after an initial review is posted because many members here won’t see an unreviewed provider.

peachs 11110 reads
posted
2 / 3

Thanks Moonray, you took one for the team, then let the team know about it. That is as or more important than a review that is so negative it may not have been displayed.Much Appreciated

Laker666 118 Reviews 9644 reads
posted
3 / 3

I believe this is TER's policy regarding free membership (not sure if you are a paid member of not). I don't believe it means the provider you reviewed must have two reviews.

Laker

Register Now!