Minnesota
Baby fat-vs-Flabby-vs-BBW.....
A mental benchmark that I use is based on the first Provider I ever reviewed and I still have that mental image of her naked body before me; 5'6" = 130 #s is about the right height to weight ratio to me. Then, add 10#s for each inch of height over 5'6". And, of course, the shorter the woman, the less I would expect her to weigh. Some women have breasts that can skew the height to weight ratio and I take that into consideration. Younger women can be overweight but still carry it well and look great when naked as their elastin hasn't shown evidence of breakdown and they're still firm and bouncy. I do realize that I'm really a fool for discussing a woman's weight in public and I will likely be Blacklisted as a result. 
Any lady on this thread should be able to take what you said. If they don't like it, they can always do something about it. Height can't be changed but going from baby fat, flabby, or BBW in a positive way, that CAN be changed if desired.
... and the differences can be significant. Where 'a few extra pounds' might be used to describe a lady in one part of the country, BBW would be used to describe her in other areas of the country.
A mental benchmark that I use is based on the first Provider I ever reviewed and I still have that mental image of her naked body before me;
5'6" = 130 #s is about the right height to weight ratio to me. Then, add 10#s for each inch of height over 5'6". And, of course, the shorter the woman, the less I would expect her to weigh. Some women have breasts that can skew the height to weight ratio and I take that into consideration. Younger women can be overweight but still carry it well and look great when naked as their elastin hasn't shown evidence of breakdown and they're still firm and bouncy.
I do realize that I'm really a fool for discussing a woman's weight in public and I will likely be Blacklisted as a result.
A mental benchmark that I use is based on the first Provider I ever reviewed and I still have that mental image of her naked body before me;
5'6" = 130 #s is about the right height to weight ratio to me. Then, add 10#s for each inch of height over 5'6". And, of course, the shorter the woman, the less I would expect her to weigh. Some women have breasts that can skew the height to weight ratio and I take that into consideration. Younger women can be overweight but still carry it well and look great when naked as their elastin hasn't shown evidence of breakdown and they're still firm and bouncy.
I do realize that I'm really a fool for discussing a woman's weight in public and I will likely be Blacklisted as a result.
DirtyJesus
posted
9 / 34
DirtyJesus
posted
10 / 34
...a size 9 - 12 is. I do consider myself a near expert in judging a woman's body type and assigning an appropriate corresponding TER body type descriptive when submitting a review, tho. Also, I have no clue what it means when a woman states her shoe size in her profile or ad or why she even does. I take it that a size 8 shoe is pretty average but she really doesn't want me to buy her shoes, does she? I learned long ago not to buy women clothing because I will never get it right and she will ultimately return it. That's why God invented gift cards.
bbw
It's very, very subjective, with most women holding onto that denial at the top end of chubby (baby fat) what I will say about BBW it seems easier for the shorter gals to come right out an declare themselves bbw as they end up looking rounder when they are short ( many times those gals are lighter than one would think) cute
The problems that come up are with taller gals, I'm talking 5'6" and over it can be difficult because height will account for more weight & more room to carry it, wether it's muscle, softness or flab really determines what body description you should get & it's so very hard to decide. I thnk the descriptions should be talked about and agreed upon more specifically.
For instance for some the word athletic is thought to mean thick, solid, but firm. Others think of it as 6pack and tone everywhere- IMHO makes sense. What is average? What is curvy?
Skinny fit, and skinny average, & skinny flabby, seems to better describe those who are skinny but would look better with a few pounds.... IDK..... The description for us gals can be difficult, I think height to weight proportionate is a good way to describe.
Basically anyone who looks better in clothes should just try to be as healthy as they can be and as accepting of themselves as they can, making sure to be clean and smelling extra nice & having confidence in your own skin, even if you have to fake that confidence until it becomes real, confidence is what it's all about, always.
We woman are to hard on ourselves and need to nurture the mind body connection more. Much like I can usually always find something to like about a mans looks...We, as women are all beautiful in our own way, the sound of our laugh the tilt of our head, the way we walk, nobody should ever count out body language ~ that's what brings it all together. :
It's very, very subjective, with most women holding onto that denial at the top end of chubby (baby fat) what I will say about BBW it seems easier for the shorter gals to come right out an declare themselves bbw as they end up looking rounder when they are short ( many times those gals are lighter than one would think) cute
The problems that come up are with taller gals, I'm talking 5'6" and over it can be difficult because height will account for more weight & more room to carry it, wether it's muscle, softness or flab really determines what body description you should get & it's so very hard to decide. I thnk the descriptions should be talked about and agreed upon more specifically. For instance for some the word athletic is thought to mean thick, solid, but firm. Others think of it as 6pack and tone everywhere- IMHO makes sense. What is average? What is curvy?
Skinny fit, and skinny average, & skinny flabby, seems to better describe those who are skinny but would look better with a few pounds.... IDK..... The description for us gals can be difficult, I think height to weight proportionate is a good way to describe.
Basically anyone who looks better in clothes should just try to be as healthy as they can be and as accepting of themselves as they can, making sure to be clean and smelling extra nice & having confidence in your own skin, even if you have to fake that confidence until it becomes real, confidence is what it's all about, always.
We woman are to hard on ourselves and need to nurture the mind body connection more. Much like I can usually always find something to like about a mans looks...We, as women are all beautiful in our own way, the sound of our laugh the tilt of our head, the way we walk, nobody should ever count out body language ~ that's what brings it all together. :
...a size 9 - 12 is. I do consider myself a near expert in judging a woman's body type and assigning an appropriate corresponding TER body type descriptive when submitting a review, tho. Also, I have no clue what it means when a woman states her shoe size in her profile or ad or why she even does. I take it that a size 8 shoe is pretty average but she really doesn't want me to buy her shoes, does she? I learned long ago not to buy women clothing because I will never get it right and she will ultimately return it. That's why God invented gift cards.
a six pack!
tinknal
posted
34 / 34