My provider cancelled out on me for my light-bondage BDSM date tonight. I am really bummed out!! She was offering a great rate too for a multi-hour date.

This is the first time this lady has done that??

So much for the great night I was looking forward to having

Im pretty certain he did a multitude of things *improperly*

Bunny 1 Fondle 0

To a more deserving person. LO

i love you
i love you
i love you
i love you

   @WhoreArt xoxox

I don't know what he did, but I'm glad I didn't piss you and Bunny off.  Booking for August now, hoping to see you for Bud Light and other good, clean fun!

I'll explain it to you later. LOL

Las Vegas

Check my latest reviews on P411 if you think I did something improperly. I beg to differ with you

I don't think you know me, therefore shouldn't make statements like that.

well sir, first of all.. you dont post reviews on p411. so I think YOURE the one who may not know what youre talking about. second of all, ill let you know exactly the things you did improperly.

-in your email to me, you mentioned another provider by name who you also had scheduled an appointment with

-in your email to me, you mentioned that said provider was offering you a "spring" discount, which then allowed you to see the three girls per nite that you were seeking.

-in your email to me, you mentioned that you were hoping i would be able to also offer you something similar

-in your email to me, you inquired what it would cost you to spend time with me when my rates are listed on like...10 different sites.  

INCLUDING THE ONES YOU CLAIM TO FREQUENT(p411, ter, and most importantly, my personal website)

 

any more questions?
ill be more than happy to answer.

...but specifically on the first point you mentioned:

Why is it a no-no for a prospective client to mention that he's also scheduled an appointment with another provider? (I mean, assuming that he's not trying to pull a "Well, I was gonna see Dolores Delvecchio on Friday eve for $XXX, but I'll cancel her and schedule with you for Friday eve if you're 'negotiable' on your rate."  That would obviously be a huge no-no).

If a client is new to a particular city, isn't it actually better if he mentions with whom else he's planning to spend time?  That way, the providers in question can use each other as a resource in the event that the client doesn't pass the smell test with one of them (or so I would think).

As for the rest of your points:  If true, Yeah, all that stuff is obviously bad.

Thank you for all the tips on how to be a better hobbyist on the board. You are right I am fairly new to this hobby. With my fetish preferences I have to explore -- because more than half of the ladies are not interested. I have to find out which ones are. Sorry if you don't like my methods, but I do find that girls feel more comfortable with my fetish fantasy if they know some of the girls that I am conversing with, trying to date, or have already seen.

I am not going down this gutter with you any more, but I do appreciate your lecturing tips. Why didn't you discuss them with me while you were in email contact? I thought you were out of town?

END OF MESSAGE

i don't know if its a "no-no" to mention another providers name.  

but i dont know a single provider who would appreciate being mentioned in someones ISO email that also mentions shes giving him a special discount and yada yada yada.  

i certainly wouldnt appreciate it, and i can guarantee you the provider mentioned wouldnt have appreciated it either.  

 
so, a "no-no"...i don't know.
but highly discourteous, yes.  
to both the provider mentioned, as well as myself.

..using one provider's willingness to offer discounts as a wedge to get other providers to do the same = A Bad Thing.

The only aspect of this that I questioned was the mentioning of one provider's name to another, primarily in terms of the "I'm new in town, so I'm disclosing this info in the interests of making the ladies feel more comfortable".

I did something like this when I first started hobbying in my primary hobby city.  It worked to the advantage of all concerned.  Only reason why I brought it up.

Tease and complete denial.

True! So True!