It's been a while since I've trudged through the TER rules and regulations, but I thought mentioning bbfs in a review was against the rules. I remember one time, unless my memory is fuzzy, I wrote a review and forgot to mention I put on the condom at any point in the review and the review wasn't approved.

Maybe I imagined it. Haha

Here's the review that got me thinking about this:
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1671431

...are ok too. This has been in effect for at least a year or more.

Wow is right. Multiple bareback partners in the same day, no less.

There is a new drug resistant std bugs out there. Even in porn there is outbreaks. Remember tests are only as good as the date in which they are given. If you get tested on Friday and have sex on Saturday then the test won't tell you if caught something that night.

That's why there is outbreaks in porn. A lady gets tested one day and everything is clear but she does a gangbang scene with 13 random guy. Then the next day she does a lesbian scene. Then two days from then she does a scene involving double anal. In porn you only get tested every 30 days. So the lady tests is still valid even through she has sex with almost 20 different people. And those people are working with other people in the biz at the same time.

It let's you know which women to avoid.

I've found that the FC is so damn close to bbfs and safe that it's my primary choice.  No orgasm is worth "a gift that keeps on giving" such as stds or worse HIV.

If you start from the top and read the third review, he claims he came inside her and she had no idea?! Ladies, have you ever experienced a man to finishing inside you and you don't feel the explosion? No way. Not possible. This guy is just a review whore and should be removed from being able to post.

If he has had his prostate removed - it's certainly physically possible.

I agree with your post, but I seem to recall in his reviews something that might make what he said possible. He said, he has problems to maintain an erection is some of his review. He could also be that ejection volume is low. Perhaps, if so, it was no "explosion" but a trickle. Perhaps, she did not feel it. Anyway, fluff in reviews regarding a punters own performance is nothing new. Still, I am not going to make this guy out to be a positive example. What those two decide to do is up to them. To me I admit that it motivates me to pass on the backpagers and focus instead with the better agencies and their lovely ladies and the ever so friendly very reputable indies.  Just my two cents on this.
 

To me, along with the review, that suggests BBFS is on the menu. She also says you'll want to see her again and again. Frankly, I don't see BP providers in general. However, even if I did, I wouldn't go anywhere near this girl.  

It mystifies me as to why anyone would want to have BBFS with someone they just met.  Either they're naive enough to think that both partners are clean, and they won't catch anything, or they already have one or more STD's, so what does it matter at this point? I tend to lean toward thinking the latter.  

I'm not naive. I realize that BBFS does happen. Fortunately, I always play safe. I love the hobby. I love the opportunity to meet new and interesting people, and I wish to continue in the hobby for a long time. I would never dream of ruining that by playing roulette with my health.

No respectable provider would go near any reviewer that openly admits they partake in BBFS. That's why I encourage providers to read a hobbyists' reviews before seeing him. It can be an invaluable source of info. One, on whether compatibility will be there, but also to determine whom not to see. Just as reviews tell me which girls I should and shouldn't see.

Final thought:What people also don't seem to realize, is that even if both of you are clean, not every provider is on B/C!  Unless you want an STD that lasts at least 18 years, cover your junk! Stay safe everybody.

While I agree with you Wheelchairman 100% I simply hate when a conversation around something about BBFS reviews turn into whether if someone should (provider or hobbyist) do it or not; or ridiculing the person or provider.  There is a thread, time and place for that conversation WHICH SHOULD BE HAD.  But this topic appeared to be about the rules concerning mentioning it in reviews and quite possibly threads.  

I would hope that we can have IN SCOPE conversations about BBFS without ever nuance around it and Female condoms devolving into whether one is "stupid", "reckless", etc etc or if someone should or shouldnt do it at all.  Again I agree with your post and appreciate your information but it just seems a little beyond the scope of what the original thread poster was addressing and inquiring.

She will get from this thread.  lol

Seriously, though, I like that ter allows mention of bb.  I don't
think that BP is the only place you can find a provider that bbfs
her clients.  In fact, I bet it happens more often then you might think.

Totally agree.  Reviews are meant to inform so I am glad it's allowed & people mention it.  Let's me know which providers to avoid.
 

looks like some Karma kicked in on his marathon BBFS tour.  

-- Modified on 2/24/2015 1:38:59 PM

Ouch!!

Well ok, I actually have several , but here is one that just jumps out at me. He says at the beginning of his review "she is the girl in the pictures", but after looking at her ad, besides having a fat ass, how the fuck could he possibly know if that was really her in the pictures??? lmao

Aside from that, it sounds like he is getting everything he so richly deserves.

Exactly.  Read his reviews and mark these ladies off the list.  What's up with all this BBFS stuff anyway?  Are these folks the ultimate adrenaline junkies or what? The hobby carries plenty enough risk for me without having to raw dog.  - Stallion

until I went to stand up. lol

Not all men "explode" but maybe squirt or ooze.  

I don't have VIP at the moment, so I don't know what the whole review says. But, if that guy is giving creampies against the providers' wishes, he needs to be blacklisted.

-- Modified on 2/24/2015 8:43:16 PM

Mr Gambler,
Where is your milk of human kindness?

If you are willing to plan ahead and are willing to drop the coin on 2 tests at $250+ each.

The newest test eliminates the concern regarding incubation period.

If I were entering a new relationship in my personal life, I would offer this as a courtesy to my potential partner and expect the courtesy of a test in return.  

I'm not suggesting that this be applied to every situation, but under the right circumstances between 2 responsible, rational adults you can eliminate the risk of exposure to the same percentage chance as a condom.  It all depends on the nature of the relationship between the provider and client.

I agree that the behavior of the review above is either fictional or crazy.

but your point is still well taken

Who are we to question him?

.

The bit dog barks the loudest.  

It's not just BP gals or BP trolls who engage in it. There's a lot of pricey ladies who do it but it's hush, hush. Secret handshake so no mention in reviews and dude thinks he's the one and only so he gives a big fat tip and repeats often.  

Having had a lot of conversations with men in the hobby, off the cuff...I know of quite a few "upscales" in this region who do it OFTEN. Pro photos and a website with all the bells and whistles doesn't mean shit.  

It happens. Don't know why people are so shocked.  IMO it's the equivalent of raw sucking a tranny who night before was raw dogging his mans asshole.  
 

Well, I also mentioned that she only communicated through text. To ensure I was in fact getting the provider in the ad I had her text a face pic of herself so that I could confirm that the provider I was showing up to see was legit. She was.

No lies. Only truth. If you chronologically go from first to last, my first was Taylor/Cassie/Snowflake, second Ashley Bear, third Molly, fourth Melody, and fifth Lexus. To clear things up... Cassie if you ever have the recent displeasure of meeting her is so disconnected from what she's doing that I have no doubt that she would not have noticed anything unusual by me cumming inside of her, even though this obviously would have been my largest/most robust cum shot of the day. She immediately put her pants on and was on the phone with another hobbyist as I was leaving, Ashley Bear wanted the creampie so that's TWO down at this point within a matter of about 2 1/2 hours including travel time. Third was Molly, which was roughly 30-45 minutes after Ashley Bear. This would've been the third cumshot in roughly 3-3 1/2 hours. If your "Explosions" are still exploding at that point I could see where you'd think I was lying. However, mine on a personal level don't "Explode" and don't have much substance after about two in a day, but kudos to you bro... You've almost got a hell of a Sherlock Holmes impersonation down pat.

This wasn't part of the BBFS Revival Tour 2015 #awesome, but I appreciate the positive juju you're sending my way.

This is laughable. Certainly there are inherent risks associated with BBFS... However, these same inherent risks are just as present with oral sex, giving or receiving. I mitigate my risk by getting tested on a regular basis, and yes there are still MANY risks, but those are risks I consciously have taken on. If anyone wants to look down upon it that's their prerogative. However, if you're engaging in any uncovered activity you're no more safe, and/or high and mighty than me.

The pussy should be warm and tight.  I guess if it's loose and cold you might be able to feel a load blow. I've had hundreds of loads blown inside and I can't ever recall feeling it until I stood up and it was running down my leg or if it puddles in the bed. But plenty of times when I can recall when I'd fuck my man 3-5 times a day and by the 3rd cup there was barely a drop.  

This dude could be whacking off like a lot of over sexed studs in the hobby... The blank stare, fist pumping at his computer monitor right up until his date, or session...whatever it is you super studs wanna call it.