Yep, just happens to be the same guy... Nothing to do with the case, which (if you do the tiniest bit of research) would have been prosecuted and WON by anyone in the job. Watch out for a paradigm shift if it comes.... Anyone who thinks a modern jury is going to believe "escort" isnt equal to "prostitute" is.... Well dreaming. They don't have to judge right or wrong, that isn't their job... Their job is to determine if there is really a difference.... Kind of a no BRAINER!
Posted By: wlmink1977
Interesting article, however, Thomas and associates were not disbarred due tot he DD case according to the article. Yet, Jazz is correct, what good it prove to publish lists?!?!?
Now the question remains what is going to happen in the Temple case?
So, you believe/know that the law may change regarding the difference between "escort" and "prostitution?" Very interesting...it would no longer be a "moral" issue, rather, a "what's the difference" issue....hope that is true, if in fact that is what you meant by your post... thanks for the info!