Minnesota

I count 4 reviews since January from the link he provides

How did this review get approved. No details about anything except we should all see this girl because he like her massage skills. Nothing about h/e or any other details. A completely useless review.

Read that one just a couple hours ago and thought the same thing!

But this is obviously a self-review and appears to be by whoever is running the establishment.  Reads like an infomercial.  Total BS

I clicked on "report a problem" and the system basically said "were on it".

All are for massages most are DIY.  The adds all look similar and all his reviews tell me nothing but shes great go see her yada yada.  I suspect they are all fake and the lack of detail makes me suspect a female wrote all of them.  Most guys like describing a woman's body in more detail even the DIY reviews talk about how hot she was or how great her ass or rack looked.  So how do we report reviews we think are fake anyway??

ThreeCupsPlease622 reads

I think it's very amusing that you and the four people that agree with you want to rewrite a review done by a person who has submitted 33 reviews, since 2005.  More importantly, the person who submitted the review actually saw the provider.

You are suggesting that the management of this forum should substitute your judgment of the provider for the judgment of the person who actually saw the provider, and submitted a review.  This website is available around the world and its popularity is based upon the premise that the person who writes a review knows what he is talking about. The primary method for the reviewer to meet that standard is to have seen the provider and engaged in activities with the provider.

If you don't believe or agree with the submitted review, why not go see the provider and then write your own review? Then, if your experience differs from that of the posted reviewer, you are allowed to describe each your contrary experience for all to read.

As an alternative, you could start your own website. It could be called "The Erotic Second Hand Story."

How is it that the process in place, as I described it, just doesn't work for you?

More than just the OP found the review to be suspect. Who made you the board mod?

Posted By: ThreeCupsPlease
I think it's very amusing that you and the four people that agree with you want to rewrite a review done by a person who has submitted 33 reviews, since 2005.  More importantly, the person who submitted the review actually saw the provider.

You are suggesting that the management of this forum should substitute your judgment of the provider for the judgment of the person who actually saw the provider, and submitted a review.  This website is available around the world and its popularity is based upon the premise that the person who writes a review knows what he is talking about. The primary method for the reviewer to meet that standard is to have seen the provider and engaged in activities with the provider.

If you don't believe or agree with the submitted review, why not go see the provider and then write your own review? Then, if your experience differs from that of the posted reviewer, you are allowed to describe each your contrary experience for all to read.

As an alternative, you could start your own website. It could be called "The Erotic Second Hand Story."

How is it that the process in place, as I described it, just doesn't work for you?

and had it rejected by TER for "lack of intimate details:!! Do they not proof reviews anymore and just publish any old lame BS???

The review is still live and well last I checked.

Register Now!