Chicago

No question about it..
Apollo-x 829 reads
posted

I am a firm believer that providers who delisted themselves for safety reasons should not be discussed and their wishes honored.

It looks to me that Renata's profile on TER is removed and site is not up. Is she on vacation?

she has been delisted at her own request..

Renata is still available. She is still advertising on RS2K, and I talked to her assistant. She is definitely still in business. I've never seen her before, but I hope to eventually.

Yes , she still is...

She's busy with DeVille this week and she's out of town next week with the O'bama (liberal BS, NATO) next week... Meaning, she's just getting out of town away from this...

SP

that is very proud at this moment in history of the former Senator of Illinois who now resides in our midst I must say I am equally excited about the arrival of Ms Renata.  In fact , it would be OK with me if she just stayed here where we could watch out for her !

Baba Booey894 reads

is now password protected.  Delisted, no web site -- not a very good business move on her part.  Out of sight, out of mind as they say.

That she did it for safety reasons?  Of course you didn't.

She (Renata) is so popular she doesnt need more reviews and doesnt advertise. Guys love her and are devoted. She isnt doing BAD business, actually its very GOOD when you no longer need to be all over the place.

Posted By: Baba Booey
is now password protected.  Delisted, no web site -- not a very good business move on her part.  Out of sight, out of mind as they say.

flyguy65688 reads

Posted By: Indieguycool
It looks to me that Renata's profile on TER is removed and site is not up. Is she on vacation?
I don't get it.  I posted a similar post a couple weeks ago asking about Renata and I get told that it is against the board rules to discuss a delisted provider and my post is removed immediately.  How's this any different?

Apollo-x570 reads

Yes, it's a very recent policy change.

Another unannounced rule change. That of course isn't the strange part. The strange part is allowing the discussion of delisted ladies. If a provider delists herself for safety reasons, she probably doesn't want to be discussed on the boards. This Change of the rule could hurt some ladies. On the other hand, if someone is delisted for breaking rules, or just to hide from bad reviews, then it would be nice to be able to discuss. But how do you draw the distinction. That is probably why the old rule was in place for so many years. To protect those who delist themselves for safety reasons, I think the old rule of not being able to discuss them is better.

Better safe than sorry.

You make some excellent points perfectstorm.  One thing to clarify though.  Delisted refers to ladies that ask for their profiles to be removed.  Banned refers to ladies that are caught doing shady shit on TER.

I think allowing discussion of banned ladies should be fine since those are the ladies we need to watch out for.  Discussing delisted providers should be prohibited.  As it has been stated, these ladies delist due to retirement or for safety reasons.  This new policy change makes no freaking sense at all.  I'm sure the stalkers and crazed ex-BF will thank TER later.

Apollo-x830 reads

I am a firm believer that providers who delisted themselves for safety reasons should not be discussed and their wishes honored.

Posted By: Apollo-x
I am a firm believer that providers who delisted themselves for safety reasons should not be discussed and their wishes honored.

Register Now!