Sometime when a review is posted, we receive a problem report showing bad phone number within the first hour. The provider is set to "report a new phone #". For obvious reasons, TER does not test each phone number.
-- Staff
I see that Christie of SD Exotics has a new review on TER. Is she back, or is this just an old reviewer finally posting?
The phone number is listed as "Report new phone#" She also has no email. If anyone has info on her I am VERY interested in seeing her.
Iggy_d
[email protected]
The reviewer mentions he last saw her in December. This is of no use to the board since she has no current contact info. Seems like the review was posted simply in an attempt to gain VIP time credit. STAFF: Is this fair pool?
My understanding is that any reviews are supposed to be fresh, within a couple months of seeing the provider. There is supposed to be a policy about this. I have personally had a review questioned about the time frame after it was lost and I sent it in again.
There is also supposed to be policy about crediting reviews without pictures. I still see reviews posted even though there isn't a good website address / pictures or other information posted with the review.
I don't have anything to do with the review approval, just referee the board. Sometimes the system seems to fail.
I sent a private email to the reviewer asking for a current phone number. If I get a response I'll pass the information along on this thread.
Actually, I believe that the review you read was originally posted on sfredbook.com in 1999?!! I tried to locate the review on the site, but it has fallen off due to its age. But, I think that it was originally done by sdsurfer619.
Post a problem report for this particular review.
If you can substantiate your claims, or, are a
well respected man about town (sorry I channel Kink's
lyrics spontaneously) you can get reviews pulled.
I have found STAFF very responsive when reviews are
questioned, or patently contrived for VIP credit.
This is after all OUR Board.
LM
It does look like my old review. It might be a case of someone sending in an old review in order to get VIP access. Just like the reviews for Bridette/Austin we still get.
Anyone reviewing those two should LOSE credits for their stupidity, and their credibility on this site should be nil. That goes for whether they actually saw the scam artists or wrote a bogus review.
I think I'll go write a review of Roseanne Barr or Janet Reno. They would each clearly qualify for 10-10 ratings, i.e.,
(Not more than) once in a lifetime!
I disagree. As far as I can tell, these two so-called wannabe escorts are still making a living, gyping helpless newbies. You can't mention the names of Bridgette & Austin too many times as blatant rip-offs. Too bad we can't apply a scarlet letter to them. If it costs a few VIP credit points to keep their name circulating and up-dated, it's a small price to pay.
Sometime when a review is posted, we receive a problem report showing bad phone number within the first hour. The provider is set to "report a new phone #". For obvious reasons, TER does not test each phone number.
-- Staff
The reviewer admits not seeing her since last December. That is clearly of no use to the membership, especially since contact information and website are no longer valid.
Please consider this a request to delete the review and a suggestion to withdraw any VIP credit gained by its submittal.