Los Angeles

Re: My Performance Scores are based on the Experience....Not on a Checklist
MysteryDude 17 Reviews 292 reads
posted

I think you will have more people complaining if the basic analytics (or rating system) is removed.

I'm getting pretty darn tired of seeing the wholesale
offering of 10's to those providers who not only don't
do anal but in some cases don't even do CIM or even
BBBJ. I actually looked back over my reviews and I was
guilty only twice of that transgression and that was because
it was two different doubles. I guess the double made
it seem like a "one is a lifetime" experience. Not a good excuse
but that was my reasoning. What I've done in the past is give
a 9 with the explanation that is was a 10 for me but TER
guidelines prevent me from giving more than a 9.
I understand that when it comes to appearance, beauty  is
in the eyes of the beholder and what may be a 10 to one
hobbyist is only a 7 or 8 to another. That's what makes
horse races. However, when there are clear guidelines for
what constitutes a 10 in performance, how does a provider
who doesn't have a full menu  get that kind of score.
If the moderators are screening these reviews and see
in the profile or in the review that anal or BBBJ or CIM
or even DFK is not offered the review should be disallowed
and sent back to the hobbyist with a reminder of the guidelines.
Anyone else have this same pet peeve?

I had a 3some with MimiLaxx and Seda and that was a 10 performance wise.

I was Needledick the Pornstar!

NDtBF

Ling was part of the double that I rated a 10
but unfortunately there are some things that
you know are off the menu that according to TER
guidelines preclude it from being a 10.
If we all give out 10's just because we had a
great time there will be more and more 10's
and will be misleading to most of us who like to
get an idea of what to really expect.
I saw MimiLaxx with Joanna, Ling with Kitty Cox
and Kitty with Melody and as great as it was the
10 according to TER is not justifiable.

I guess you'd have to read the person's review and see if they are an ATF?

My top for looks ever was Emily (info4emily)
My top for performance was Cloee (who used to double with Cindy...wish I had done that!)


Alas...both are gone.

I try to wait a couple weeks for the thrill to where off, or i fall into this category myself.

Maybe TER should standardize by supplying check boxes to what happens, and, instead of the hobbyist setting the score, an algorithm sets the score based on the check boxes selected.

Mysterydude

.......there probably should be a second check box next to the provided service rating the enthusiasm level. Maybe a 5 for being really into it versus a 1 for a perfunctory performance. I think, however, the reality is that TER has set up these rating systems a long time ago and is not in a mood to change them soon. Until that time might come I feel that it is imperative for those of us who write reviews to spend a bit more time in the juicy details describing the action and the gal's involvement and not just throw out a number with little explanation. Ciao!

The rule is clear.  If a provider offers at least 3 of the 5 listed services, then she is eligible for a 10.  So, if your provider does DFK, BBBJ, and offers doubles, then she would be eligible for a 10 score on performance.  Offering Anal sex is not a requirement for a 10.  

"An escort provider is only eligible to earn up to a 7, unless she is willing to perform one or some of the following during a session: Kisses With Tongue, Bare-Back Blow Job, Really Bi, and Anal Sex, or More than One Guy. For each of these services that are offered, her potential max score is raised by one point, with 10 as an absolute maximum."

No point in having a system that runs 1-10 if only 8-10 are used. More than just the number though, I go by the qualitative measure.

A 7 performance rating means I had a really fun time. I would repeat with a 7. An 8 means she went a little above and beyond, or as TER puts it: "Went the Extra Mile".

Now I haven't given any 1-6 scores but that's because I do tons of research, and have been lucky so far. :)  If the need arose, I'd write up a 1/1 no problem.

Overrating really does annoy me. It's like when you're in a project meeting with say 10 features/objectives and ask management to flag which ones are high priority. Then the suits pick 7 of them as MISSION CRITICAL and the rest HIGH PRIORITY. Well damn, I'm not saying any of the objectives won't be done. I need you guys to pick out which to do first. /slap

If everyone is a 10, then no one is a 10.

The number system is abused over and over again.   Write a review, include details and observations and leave it at that.  If a guy has a great time with a beautiful provider it will be obvious by the details of the review.  The number ratings have become meaningless because of myriad wk's and ass-kissers throwing around undeserved 9's and 10's.

I agree...the number system has degraded to the point of the abuse it has reached. I would agree to just a review system by itself

single or double, always a 10....

Posted By: mufftime
I'm getting pretty darn tired of seeing the wholesale
offering of 10's to those providers who not only don't
do anal but in some cases don't even do CIM or even
BBBJ. I actually looked back over my reviews and I was
guilty only twice of that transgression and that was because
it was two different doubles. I guess the double made
it seem like a "one is a lifetime" experience. Not a good excuse
but that was my reasoning. What I've done in the past is give
a 9 with the explanation that is was a 10 for me but TER
guidelines prevent me from giving more than a 9.
I understand that when it comes to appearance, beauty  is
in the eyes of the beholder and what may be a 10 to one
hobbyist is only a 7 or 8 to another. That's what makes
horse races. However, when there are clear guidelines for
what constitutes a 10 in performance, how does a provider
who doesn't have a full menu  get that kind of score.
If the moderators are screening these reviews and see
in the profile or in the review that anal or BBBJ or CIM
or even DFK is not offered the review should be disallowed
and sent back to the hobbyist with a reminder of the guidelines.
Anyone else have this same pet peeve?

Now you're talking about a true 10.
Not many like her out there.
The perfect 10 for performance.

To this day I have a smile on my face because of MiMi LAX. So sorry she moved on........A true definition of a 10 performance.

When I rate a session with a provider I base it on the overall experience with her and not on the TER official handbook checklist. For example I have given only one 10/10 in my long and sorted career and that was to Blaire Whitmore. Now Blaire does not offer Anal which technically should prevent her from reaching a 10....and since I did not finish with a BJ the CIM option was not there either.....BUT I you read my (and othe's) review of her you will she that it was one of the most intensly erotic and sexually intense sessions that I have ever had because Blaire is highly orgasmic and loves sex and it certainly qualifed as a once in a lifetime experience for me.

Now on the other end of the spectrum I have had sessions where the provider offered (and we attempted) all of the items on the checklist but the overall experience was just average....there is no way I am giving out a 10.

In my opinion the burden should be on the Hobbyist to write a better review to help the team understand why the provider earned the score he gave her.  A 4 line review that lists all the appropriate ackronyms....DFK, DATY, Greek and BBBJTCIM etc....with a score of 10 is useless to me. It tells me nothing about the experience or what to expect from the lady. I would much rather see a review where the Hobbyist details why it was a Once in a Lifetime for him which allows me to decide if I want to see the lady. It may not be a 10 for me but I would take that over the checklist.

Just my $0.02.......Hobby On!

That's just another reason to eliminate the
number system and rely on the reviewer's
description of his experience.

I think you will have more people complaining if the basic analytics (or rating system) is removed.

ISOFBSM346 reads

I know I've given a couple 10's.  But at the time I gave them I thought she was the hottest I had the chance to meet.  Then later I get the opportunity to meet another that is just as good or better, so I have no choice but to give her a 10 also.

That being said, when i look at other's reviews, I always knock the average down a notch.  So if she averages a 9, then i figure she'll be pretty hot, if she averages an 8, it's still promising, but no longer will I see an average below an 8, even if her looks really tempt me because I feel most people inflate their ratings (and weight scale also)

Very well put.
Stated another way, we can only rate based upon a penultimate experience unless we know that there won't be anything that would be defined as "ultimate".
I had a crazy English Literature professor that was totally hung up on James Joyce.
He pontificated that the only time in life that one could fully appreciate Finnigan's Wake would be to read it the year before you die.
While I totally agree with the issues associated with inflated ratings, there is also a degree of excitement in wondering if one can top the current penultimate experience with something better in the future.

I have given 10s twice recently.  One was for a 3 way with Anica and Jenny in which all criteria were met.  I felt this was truly a one in a lifetime event.

The second occasion was recently with Cumisha Amado.  I don't think I would get too many arguments that this experience was not a 10.

I believe the service level has risen so much in the last couple of years that sometimes we are overwelmed by the great service offered.

By the time I got to see Mimi Laxxx, she was UTR and didn't want anymore reviews.  But she is the only 10/10 I've ever experienced.  I know the 10 in looks is subjective, but she does it for me.  She definitely deserves the 10 in performance under TER guidelines.  The best ever as far as I am concerned.

As  I stated earlier Mimi was the epitome
of the 10 rating. There was no better.
Some may have preferred Brooke Song
but I don't think she could hold a candle
to the incomparable Mimi Laxx.

Harpman60402 reads


are inconsistent with the services detailed in the profile the score is downgraded.

The problem is profiles are not upgraded. A top K-doll no longer does doubles and was never really bi ( for her it's all a show) yet the profile has not been modified to reflect her current menu. She consistently gets 10's for performance despite the fact she no longer offers the services that constitute a 10 according to review guidelines .

I have no problem with her getting 10s because her overall performance  is off the charts.there should be a system that enables those who are stellar in every area but don't bring in partners nor offer Greek to be numerically recognized. There are many intangibles that make an experience a once in a lifetime.

Posted By: mufftime
I'm getting pretty darn tired of seeing the wholesale
offering of 10's to those providers who not only don't
do anal but in some cases don't even do CIM or even
BBBJ. I actually looked back over my reviews and I was
guilty only twice of that transgression and that was because
it was two different doubles. I guess the double made
it seem like a "one is a lifetime" experience. Not a good excuse
but that was my reasoning. What I've done in the past is give
a 9 with the explanation that is was a 10 for me but TER
guidelines prevent me from giving more than a 9.
I understand that when it comes to appearance, beauty  is
in the eyes of the beholder and what may be a 10 to one
hobbyist is only a 7 or 8 to another. That's what makes
horse races. However, when there are clear guidelines for
what constitutes a 10 in performance, how does a provider
who doesn't have a full menu  get that kind of score.
If the moderators are screening these reviews and see
in the profile or in the review that anal or BBBJ or CIM
or even DFK is not offered the review should be disallowed
and sent back to the hobbyist with a reminder of the guidelines.
Anyone else have this same pet peeve?
-- Modified on 5/12/2012 8:41:57 AM

That's why I say get rid of the numbers.
Just tell your story and that should suffice.
We'll get it!

Or better yet. Let's have a number range so
when we're shopping we'll at least know the
good from the bad. Then we can read the review
and make our choices.
8-10--------Top of the line.
5-8--------- Mediocre
Below 5--- FUGGEDABOUDIT!!!

Register Now!