Politics and Religion

The reason the last stimulus didn;t work
LynetteMarie See my TER Reviews 1510 reads
posted
1 / 50

Some people recommend not discussing politics or religion.  

I'm not one of them.  :)

Welcome President Obama to Cox Pavilion today!  Anyone else going to be there?  
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
From examiner.com:

This Thursday, June 7, 2012, President Barack Obama will make his 10th visit to Las Vegas since taking office. This visit is an official trip, not a campaign visit. The President will focus on student loans and interest rates which are set to double in July if Congress does not act soon.

The President is expected to speak at the Cox Pavilion on the UNLV campus around 12:45 p.m., the event is free, but tickets are required and may no longer be available. Doors open to the public at 10:30 a.m., for parking and security information, click here.

Currently the interest rate for a student loan is 3.4 percent; in July, if Congress does not act the rate will double to 6.8 percent.

President Obama and his wife Michelle, have real life experiences with student loans, as both needed them to pay their way through college. They can relate.

   "For the first eight years of our marriage we were paying more in student loans than we were paying for our mortgage,” Obama said recently, “So we know what this is about."

Mitt Romney, the presumptive presidential nominee for the Republican Party, has no such life experiences while attending Harvard. And as we have seen throughout the Romney campaign he cannot relate to most of the life experiences that Americans deal with on a day to day basis.

While this is an official visit, Nevadans can expect to see future campaign visits by the President before November’s election since Nevada is a key battleground State.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Laffy 2 Reviews 514 reads
posted
2 / 50

I was about 10 feet away from the stage.

Pretty cool.

I want to see Air Force One, no matter who is the Prez, but I always miss it.

HippieHater 325 reads
posted
3 / 50

he should go back to kenya

slowslowslow 4 Reviews 284 reads
posted
4 / 50

Do you send 30 or 40% of your income to the feds?

I didnt think so.....

Like most parasites looking to steal other people's money, you dont have the courage to do it yourself.  Instead you use politicians to do it for you.

Ironically, you are a free market capitalist but dont support (via your proxies) the free market for others.

Laffy 2 Reviews 301 reads
posted
5 / 50

Here's one example:

Righties love to rip the Post Office as an example of "How government can't do anything right and they just bleed cash and they should let private business do it."

The people living out in the boonies get their postage subsidized by everyone else as it cost a LOT more to deliver their mail than it does to those in the city.

If private business took over mail delivery, I guarantee you those in rural areas, who are almost all Righties, would see their costs for stamps sky-rocket.

Then there are all the farmers, almost all Righties, who would go out of business tomorrow if it weren't for the welfare the rest of us give to them.

And how about the people who buy a house who get a deduction but not those that rent?

The list is endless.

And before you whine I'm a "liberal", I think the extreme ones are almost as bad as the "conservatives."

Palin, the Goddess of the TeaBaggers, had her hand out more than ANY liberal and her sheep completely ignore it.

Laffy 2 Reviews 244 reads
posted
6 / 50

I thought you guys were for "fiscal responsibility."

Also, that's not his exact quote.......and you know it.

I will not be voting for Obama again, Johnson is getting my vote, but he's 1,000 times better than Georgie was.

And Righties did NOTHING but lick his boots.

If a Dem had been in charge those 8 years, you guys would have burned down the White House in protest.

Instead, we got NOTHING but excuses.

Righties = most intellectually dishonest people on earth


Oh, and speaking of moochers and not wanting to pass debt onto our grandkids, when are Righties going to DEMAND we have a tax NOW to pay for their wars?  We're the FIRST generation to make ZERO sacrifice during war time.  

Not only did Bush refuse to pay for his wars, he cut taxes for the FIRST TIME during war time.  Pathetic.

The day Righties say we HAVE to pay for the wars NOW is the day I take them seriously on fiscal and moral responsibility.

LynetteMarie See my TER Reviews 434 reads
posted
7 / 50

...I own two corporations, do this for fun and income along with being an independent contractor at my "day job."

I own a home here in Nevada along with property in the Midwest along with stocks and other investments so there's no way I could get away with not paying taxes.

That said, I certainly do give a sh*t ton of my money to the feds.  

Along with tithing to my church,  donating to human rights organizations along with donating large amounts of time to organizations, lobbying, campaigning, doing phone banks, etc...  

Not trying to be a show off, but these are things that truly do make me happy.  If you know me, you'll know these aspects are HUGE parts of my life.

Do I enjoy paying taxes?  Errrrrrrggghhhh.....  yes and no.  It's painful to give a big chunk of my money away, yes.  It's upsetting that others don't pay their taxes.  But that's none of my business, really.  

After sending those quarterly payments away, painful as they are, I do feel better knowing that I've done my deed as a citizen.

Until things change, if they ever do, I do what the feds ask to me do.  :)



Posted By: slowslowslow
Do you send 30 or 40% of your income to the feds?

I didnt think so.....

Like most parasites looking to steal other people's money, you dont have the courage to do it yourself.  Instead you use politicians to do it for you.

Ironically, you are a free market capitalist but dont support (via your proxies) the free market for others.

LynetteMarie See my TER Reviews 337 reads
posted
8 / 50
whatever14 2 Reviews 289 reads
posted
9 / 50

Not that I'd be welcome in that crowd, but I'll be volunteering my time to help elementary and high school children.  I find it laughable that a guy that's babysat the worst economy in recent years tells us that a guy that ran both private and public sector "companies" doesn't have the experience to do the job.  I'm just thankful that I don't have to deal with the traffic nightmare he'll cause.  The only good news is that he's not at his desk, continuing to push everything for the unions, as if the rest of us don't exist.

Laffy 2 Reviews 353 reads
posted
10 / 50

No matter what, they think their taxes are "too high."

If taxes were 1%, they'd STILL bitch and cry.

As everyone knows, Nevada has no income tax.

And much/most of our taxes come from soaking the tourists.

Yet, they STILL whine we're "taxed too much" while our schools and roads are literally falling apart.

Yes, paying taxes sucks.

But, that's part of living in a civilized society.

Righties need to quit paying victim 24/7 and join the real world.

I'm all for cutting the debt.

But austerity is destroying Europe and should not be done here.

Again...I'm not a Dem and I think they are FAR from perfect.

Just really tired of the hypocrisy of Righties and acting like Obama is SATAN.....especially after they tossed Bush's salad for 8 years.

THAT guy was a REAL disaster.

Laffy 2 Reviews 305 reads
posted
11 / 50

so please tell us why you think he'll do better as Prez.

He was too chicken to run for re-election because he knew he'd lose because of the horrible job he did.

And as far as "saving the Olympics", he only did that with a....wait for it....federal bailout.

Romney has flip-flopped on every single issue known to man.



whatever14 2 Reviews 287 reads
posted
12 / 50

He's not Obama.  He can't help but do a better job.  You know it's bad when the fix for our housing problem is an earthquake to destroy supply and unemployment is best fixed by an epidemic to kill all the unemployed.

Laffy 2 Reviews 226 reads
posted
13 / 50

Hate to break it to ya, but the economy CRATERED when a RIGHTY was in charge.

And Mitt basically wants to do the EXACT SAME THING as Bush did:

Cut taxes for the rich

Get rid of almost all regulations

Bomb any country that looks at us wrong.


No thanks.

HippieHater 331 reads
posted
14 / 50

those were the words of obama.  

Laffy 2 Reviews 371 reads
posted
15 / 50

to have a different opinion.

Nor that everyone should think the same.

Just disgusted by the hypocrisy and fake outrage of the Right.

Georgie exploded the debt and not a single Tea Bagger said a FUCKING WORD until the black guy got in office.

Same thing with "He ignores the Constitution."

Bush wiped his ass with it and the Right was SILENT.

HippieHater 439 reads
posted
16 / 50

i like your thinking dogg

Cut taxes for the rich would be great!!!!!!!

Haha everyone is allowed to have an opinion.  If we were all the same, life would be boring

nuguy46 278 reads
posted
17 / 50

So why is the Campaigner in chief so much better than Romney?

he did what, when?
he has used AF1 more than any other prez to fly (an entourage)  to 'exotic' vacation retreats, etc...and he wins the 'tele prompter' usage rate contest....and he has blamed his predecessor more than any previous prez ha....and i think he is the first to award the Nation's Freedom Medal to a well known Socialist....should i continue to list his accomplishments?

Posted By: Laffy
so please tell us why you think he'll do better as Prez.

He was too chicken to run for re-election because he knew he'd lose because of the horrible job he did.

And as far as "saving the Olympics", he only did that with a....wait for it....federal bailout.

Romney has flip-flopped on every single issue known to man.



Laffy 2 Reviews 312 reads
posted
18 / 50

Bush was so incompetent without a teleprompter, they actually had to write for him, "Hi honey, how are you?" for the Republican convention for his re-election.

It was painful to watch.

And Palin can't say 5 words without looking down to read it.

Obama can debate ANY topic and not look at ANY notes.

And RayGun would have folded without his teleprompter.

Of course, you have proof of the "more vacations" than any Prez, right?

And your Nazi KKK site, aka Faux/Breitbart, doesn't count.

Bush and his cronies blamed Clinton until his last day in office.

And RayGun blamed Carter constantly.

As far as your boy Mitt, he was asked about his horrible job numbers as Gov and, of course, he said, "The first year shouldn't count against me because I inherited a horrible economy."

Of course, he counts Obama's first year against him anyway.

Obama has caved to the Righties on virtually EVERY issue there is.

Hell, the Left is more mad at him than the Right.

So to say he is a "Socialist" just proves your stupidity.

mattradd 40 Reviews 342 reads
posted
19 / 50

every time his name is brought up, most people haven't forgotten what a poor job he did as president, as evidenced by the article attached referring to a CNN poll. Mitts only card is that he can try to claim that Obama didn't pull our economy out of the ditch sooner. Well, that's a weak argument, and anyone claiming they could have done better has no way of proving it. And, being a venture capitalist doesn't qualify one as being a jobs creator, just a shrewd money maker (not that there's anything wrong with than). Just makes his claim as a jobs creator very, very weak!  But, all of that doesn't really matter, because the bankers, and all the big wigs the the healthcare, pharmaceutical, defense, insurance and the rest of Wall Street will fill Romney's coffers to get him elected!

no_email 3 Reviews 329 reads
posted
20 / 50

Even a President that does a bad job has more expierence than a person who has not been president.

I don't know why Romney (Republican money's) campaign is running on the experience platform.

Boycott the election.

hardway4433 11 Reviews 314 reads
posted
21 / 50

IMHO neither party has the solutions or the willingness to do what it takes to make this country what it should be.  Both are addicted to corporate and PAC $$.  I don’t like the “Righty versus Lefty” stuff because when I sit down with most intelligent people they know that on one hand we have to pay some taxes, but we also stand against government waste.  Most of my friends want a government that is responsible on fiscal issues (right), but stays out of my personal choices on social issues (left).  WE must demand better from all of them.  We simply need better options.  I will most likely put my money and my vote with the Libertarian because I don’t feel there can be any real change with the two parties so ingrained.

Laffy 2 Reviews 269 reads
posted
22 / 50


And both are owned by Big Business.

slowslowslow 4 Reviews 536 reads
posted
23 / 50

If ever a narcisist was elected President, its this amateur.

Makes a great talk show host, but he is morally bankrupt.
Beholden to economy wrecking unions and crazed, rabid environmentalists he is the most dishonest man to hold office.

His appeal boils down to "Ill steal from the rich and give it to you, so vote for me"

Sure, Bush was beholden to his special own interets and was a terrible President, but dont fall into the two party trap.  This guy is terrible in his own right and is coming to steal your money

anonymousfun 6 Reviews 260 reads
posted
24 / 50

Not a single planet. All 8 planets in the milky way galaxy threatened, they will rather explode!

anonymousfun 6 Reviews 322 reads
posted
25 / 50
St. Croix 250 reads
posted
27 / 50

If you are going to trash somebody, at least get what they did in life correct. Venture capitalists are different than private equity, which is what Romney did at Bain. The former provides early stage financing to high risk start-up companies. See any Silicon Valley company. The latter generally invests in broken or orphaned companies. They either fix it or kill it.

I really don't know how you can write the shit you post, especially considering you don't know what he did for a living.

SoftlySarah See my TER Reviews 236 reads
posted
28 / 50

I wish there were a "Love" button!

SoftlySarah See my TER Reviews 234 reads
posted
29 / 50
SoftlySarah See my TER Reviews 298 reads
posted
30 / 50

If this could become a reality, we as a nation could put election reform on the ballot. It is the only way I can think of to change the sorry and useless two-party system. (two-party being a bit of a joke)

Now granted there could be some really big issues with this (like the stupid prop 187 in CA becoming a federal initiative, among other awful ideas), but short of anything else, we're in a catch-22. Unless we had a president willing to sacrifice a second term to do the right thing. Which is a pipe dream (unless Kucinich somehow got elected).

Excerpt:
The National Citizens Initiative for Democracy is a proposal which will permit citizens to make laws by ballot initiative.

   -Creates a Legislative Initiative process in all jurisdictions of government, most specifically at the federal level
   -Becomes a new check in our system of checks and balances
   -Does not modify Congress, the Presidency, or the Judiciary
   -Endorsed by highly respected people
   -NCID evolved from an earlier iteration called "National Initiative for Democracy" (NI4D). Updates have been made throughout the site as practicable.

http://ni4d.us/
--------------------------------------------

To learn more about what a quagmire we're in and why we need real change, see this:

THE BEST GOVERNMENT MONEY CAN BUY?
http://thebestgovernmentmoneycanbuy.com/

Synopsis:
THE BEST GOVERNMENT MONEY CAN BUY? is the first behind-the-scenes, comprehensive, non-partisan examination of the system of lobbying in Washington, DC.

The cost of election campaigns has spiraled out of control, to the extent that, on average, our representatives spend more than 25% of their time fund-raising.   Even our Presidents regularly interrupt the nation’s work in order to spend time fund-raising!

Raising funds to get elected – that's the key interface between lobbyists and Members of Congress.

The number of registered lobbyists has more than doubled since 2000; their fees have also increased by 100%; and in 2006-7 they spent a staggering $13.5 million per day.  Over the past six years, they have spent more than $13 billion. Would it be naive to conclude that the interests whose money they channel into the political process, expect nothing in return for it?

Veteran documentary film-maker, British-born Francis Megahy, makes a journey of discovery as he tries to answer some questions which puzzle him: who provides the money? What effect does it have? How is it connected to the financing of political campaigns?  And most crucial, is it in the public interest?

Both Barack Obama and John McCain made the issue of lobbyists a central part of the 2008 Presidential Elections. But can any President really change this constitutionally-protected activity? Indeed, can any of us affect this process?

THE BEST GOVERNMENT MONEY CAN BUY? explores the issue through interviews with real Washington beltway insiders, key participants in the process – who often speak with surprising candor.

It is disturbing that in a democracy, such a powerful, effective and un-elected force, which is able to influence profound legislative changes affecting the lives of all Americans, can be so little known and so little understood by voters.

THE BEST GOVERNMENT MONEY CAN BUY? hopes that this documentary will go some way towards enlightening our fellow-citizens, by helping them to discover – as we discovered – just what goes on in Washington.

We hope that it will provoke people into thinking afresh about lobbying, and whether or not it should be subject to any form of control by the American people.

THE BEST GOVERNMENT MONEY CAN BUY? will make audiences of all political stripes pause and reconsider their views on lobbying.

LynetteMarie See my TER Reviews 292 reads
posted
31 / 50

I respect your opinion and hope you respect those of us who are Obama supporters.  :p

MyDrunkAliass 281 reads
posted
32 / 50

VERY WELL STATED.... BIG THUMBS UP.

What most people fail to realize when talking politics is how BLOATED Government has become in the past decade.

Obama wants people to believe that voting for him will return the U.S. to the Clinton years but the reality is that nothing has been done during his term to downsize and make the Federal Government more efficient ---- and spend what they spent during the Clinton years.

Federal Government spending blew up during the Bush years and under Obama, it's gotten even bigger. It seems as if the Libertarians or people like Dr. Ron Paul are the only ones that get it.

Now we are talking about another Stimulus when the last stimulus bill generated the lowest ROI in the history of stimulus bills. Anybody that can support all of the wasted money the Federal Government spends is obviously clueless of what's going on underneath the surface and relying on the lamestream media for their opinions. Damn! We are now paying over 450 Billion dollars a year on just interest payments on all of the public debt that has been racked up. What could all of that money be better used for? Instead.... he wants to tax the people who pay over 80% of all the taxes even more. As if raising another $80 Billion a year is really going to put a dent in anything when the Federal Government is spending $4 Billion dollars A DAY.

In 2004, Obama gave the speech at the DNC convention that it's not a Red America or a Blue America, it's the United States of America that propelled him to rock star fame. Since he took office, the country is much more divided today then I've ever seen it as long as I've been alive.

Sad.... Very Sad.

Obama is clueless when it comes to Economic Matters and right now, we don't need a financially inept President setting agendas that are only making the poor and middle class even poorer.

Slogan of 2012 is "It's a Debt Problem, Stupid."

Posted By: hardway4433
IMHO neither party has the solutions or the willingness to do what it takes to make this country what it should be.  Both are addicted to corporate and PAC $$.  I don’t like the “Righty versus Lefty” stuff because when I sit down with most intelligent people they know that on one hand we have to pay some taxes, but we also stand against government waste.  Most of my friends want a government that is responsible on fiscal issues (right), but stays out of my personal choices on social issues (left).  WE must demand better from all of them.  We simply need better options.  I will most likely put my money and my vote with the Libertarian because I don’t feel there can be any real change with the two parties so ingrained.    

MyDrunkAliass 278 reads
posted
33 / 50

"But austerity is destroying Europe and should not be done here."

No -- Actually spending FAR more then you bring in for years destroyed Greece, Italy, Portugal, Ireland and Spain.

Germany and Canada have had Austerity measures in place since the 1990's and now both of their economies are FAR healthier then the U.S. Heck.... Germany is the only reason why Europe has not already collapsed so that whole Austerity measures "destroying" Europe is all HOKIE nonsense drummed up by the lefties that are all for printing up more money to save their non debt paying arses.

Go out and spend 1.5 times your income on Providers and eventually you will have to back off and practice some "austerity" measures.

By the way -- as for Nevada. The state budget back in the late 90's, early 2000's was half of what it is today and the state was just Fine. It was not until around 2004 when the budget started going out of control because of all the money that was coming into the coffers when the good times were a rolling.

This can pretty much be repeated in many states across the country. Residents of California and Illinois pay State Income Taxes and those states are technically BK. In FAR WORSE shape then Nevada where Residents pay NO State Income Tax.

As if the Tourists in California don't get raped.... PUHLEASE!

Posted By: Laffy
No matter what, they think their taxes are "too high."

If taxes were 1%, they'd STILL bitch and cry.

As everyone knows, Nevada has no income tax.

And much/most of our taxes come from soaking the tourists.

Yet, they STILL whine we're "taxed too much" while our schools and roads are literally falling apart.

Yes, paying taxes sucks.

But, that's part of living in a civilized society.

Righties need to quit paying victim 24/7 and join the real world.

I'm all for cutting the debt.

But austerity is destroying Europe and should not be done here.

Again...I'm not a Dem and I think they are FAR from perfect.

Just really tired of the hypocrisy of Righties and acting like Obama is SATAN.....especially after they tossed Bush's salad for 8 years.

THAT guy was a REAL disaster.

MyDrunkAliass 274 reads
posted
34 / 50

Georgie exploded the Debt..... Obama came right in and exploded the debt even more and has no sustainable plan to fix anything.

Printing up Trillions does nothing in fixing a long term problem. Just look at the Greece debacle for the past two years.

Time for a New President that understands what ROI means.

Posted By: Laffy
to have a different opinion.

Nor that everyone should think the same.

Just disgusted by the hypocrisy and fake outrage of the Right.

Georgie exploded the debt and not a single Tea Bagger said a FUCKING WORD until the black guy got in office.

Same thing with "He ignores the Constitution."

Bush wiped his ass with it and the Right was SILENT.

mattradd 40 Reviews 241 reads
posted
35 / 50

But, can you prove that, as Mitt claims, that in his work with Bain he created more good jobs that what were lost? Until I see the proof I do not believe his claims that his experience at Bain makes him more qualified as a jobs creator. I'd say that is more the issue.  

P.S. The average job at Staple or some pizza joint don't count in my book! ;)

nuguy46 264 reads
posted
36 / 50

well said MDA.
I'l add:  Are you better off today than under Reagan?
under Bush #1?
under Clinton?
under Bush #2?

if you said 'no', then why?

As for a divided country, agree, more dividied than ever in history...that's due in large part to the chief Dem class warfare he's given us....every one hates anybody who makes a buck more than they do.....make the current pretender a one termer!  cannot get any worse.

Laffy 2 Reviews 275 reads
posted
37 / 50

Many of those clowns STILL think Saddam was behind 9/11.

And study after study after study shows people that watch Faux are CLUELESS on the issues.

And Georgie's people even admitted they faked terror alerts to keep the sheep in line.

Laffy 2 Reviews 323 reads
posted
38 / 50

is because it had too much tax cuts and not enough actual spending.

What he should have done is say, "We're going to spend a trillion dollars to fix our roads, schools, bridges, sewers, etc.  Not a penny for anything else."

It's actually COSTING us money to let them deteriorate.

Many Righties actually think it's a good idea but refuse to support it because they'd rather see the economy fail so Obama gets ZERO credit for ANYTHING.

They are more loyal to their Party than they are to America.

They disgust me.

Laffy 2 Reviews 366 reads
posted
39 / 50

First of all, no one put a gun to people's heads making them use their homes as ATMs during Georgie's reign.

So for all of them to blame Obama because their situation is worse is just more victim crap.

And as far as blaming Obama for the country being more divided is one of the dumbest things I've EVER heard.

He has caved to the Righties on almost EVERYTHING.

And yet, they REFUSE to bend.

And what about all the personal attacks from the Right?

Beyond brutal.

And last time I checked, Obama has never said, "If you don;t agree with my policies, you hate America" like Bush and his bootlickers said 24/7.

Officer Cartman 59 Reviews 327 reads
posted
40 / 50

Holy crap you are dense.  The stimulus was a giant friggen slush fund for Obama and his Democrat buddies and nothing more.

nuguy46 281 reads
posted
42 / 50

you gotta be shitting us all.l.
You want MORE handouts to Obama's jockstrap crowd?  
OMG.....WTF happened to the world's greates country?
Socialism, corruptness and ego brought to us by the "we can't wait for Change crowd"......

marikod 1 Reviews 236 reads
posted
43 / 50

First, Bain Capital does have a venture capital subsidiary, Bain Capital Ventures.

     Second, the media has hopelessly confused the two, sometimes using venture capital and private equity as being synonymous, although are they are fundamentally different business approaches as St. Croix points out. So you probably did read various media describing Romney and Bain as venture capitalists.

     Now, as I understand it, Romney did spend most of his time at Bain on the private equity side. But here is why you are effectively correct in referring to him as a VC guy - when he claims he created a 100,000 jobs, he is primarily referring to Staples and the Sports Authority which were venture capital investments of Bain.

Football Guy 15 Reviews 229 reads
posted
44 / 50

I got stuck in the traffic mess he created at the  Airport. I did get to flip off is limo when he went by.This clown is an international joke. Secet leaks.American gun rights are being challenged by his puppet Attorney General while he arms the mexican cartels at the same time.WAKE UP AMERICA!

St. Croix 426 reads
posted
45 / 50

No he didn't! Neither did you! You went to their website and saw Bain Capital Ventures. Did you take the initiative to look at those companies supported by Bain Capital Ventures? You would have come to the conclusion that Bain Capital Ventures is not really a VC in the sense and definition of a VC.

I got a bit tired after about 6 reviews where Bain's Capital Ventures work looked similar to private equity. Bain's engagement included financing help, strategy development, M&A, etc. Interestingly enough, Bain invested in Village Ventures, which is by definition is a pure VC. Just a reminder, Village Ventures is the VC, not Bain.

So just because the media hopelessly confuses its audience about the definition, responsibility, role, whatever, does not dissolve mattradd, or anyone else's responsibility to do their homework.

Can you, mattradd or I readily quantify that Romney/Bain created 100,000 jobs? No! Can mattradd, you or I summarily reject that claim? No! But understanding private equity aka leverage buyouts, and venture capital models, I would have absolutely no problem putting up any bet that the total number of jobs created exceeded 100,000. One only has to look at the companies Bain supports financially, as a result of their private equity role. Look at their clients websites, more specifically the tab called "careers" or "jobs", and one could easily back into a number of 100K or more. And most of these are not $10 an hour jobs at Staples, but jobs that require specific education and skills, which I might exist are in very short supply in this country.

Another way of quantifying jobs created is the tangible benefit of the investment. Did the investment allow for the design, development, implementation, and marketing of a new product and/or service. Did the investment necessitate the addition of specific skills sets? I can go on and on, but I hope you see my point.





-- Modified on 6/8/2012 9:12:13 PM

LynetteMarie See my TER Reviews 368 reads
posted
46 / 50

The traffic reporters were were going to schedule all of it.

And they did!  ::

I flew to Jamaica and back, no worries.  


-- Modified on 6/9/2012 1:55:02 AM

marikod 1 Reviews 325 reads
posted
47 / 50

critiquing my "Rats in California" post, albeit that I think you missed that I was talking about the two legged variety.


   Bain Venture Capital self-describes as being the venture capital arm of Bain and cites "the firms" over 125 venture capital investments in early stage companies:

"Bain Capital Ventures is the venture arm within Bain Capital, which has approximately $60 billion of assets under management worldwide. The firm's history of investing in early stage companies dates back to 1984 with over 125 venture investments since inception. Bain Capital Ventures manages approximately $2 billion of committed capital, has over 70 active portfolio companies, and has offices in Boston, New York, and Palo Alto. The firm has helped steer many ideas to success by working in partnership with management teams, pairing talented and passionate entrepreneurs with industry experts, opening doors to customers, and collaborating on sound long-term strategies."


         That's not good enough for you? Okay let's look at the two specific examples I gave in my post -Staples and Sports Authority.  From the link



"Bain Capital also made venture capital investments from other funds in start-ups and other earlier stage companies that are not included in the performance measure mentioned above. Those venture capital investments included successful investments in Staples, Sports Authority, and Gartner Group.

How many jobs did Romney and Bain Capital create?

While we will probably never be able to measure the true numbers, it seems pretty clear that ‘looting’ is an inaccurate description of what happened with these companies.
There are two ways to look at job creation. The first is to look at jobs created and lost in Bain Capital’s companies at the time Romney left Bain Capital at the beginning of 1999. The second is to look at jobs created and lost in those same companies today. This gives Romney and Bain Capital credit for having invested in those companies when they were young. It is inappropriate to include companies that Bain Capital invested in after Romney left because he did not have any impact on those investments.

While it is difficult, if not impossible, to get employment data on all of Bain Capital’s investments, and not all of the data are perfect, it is possible to look at some of the successes and failures to get a sense of magnitudes.

Among Bain Capital’s investments under Romney, the large job creators are clearly Staples and Sports Authority. Both of these were small, young companies when Bain Capital invested in them. Bain invested in Staples when it had only one store, so there were likely fewer than 200 employees at the time. Bain appears to have invested in the Sports Authority when it had fewer than ten stores. Unfortunately, there are no public data to say how many people were employed at that time. At the end of 1998, Staples had more than 42,000 employees, Sports Authority had almost 14,000, Gartner Group had almost 3,000, and Steel Dynamics had over 500. So at the beginning of 1999, when Romney left Bain Capital, these four companies alone employed almost 60,000 total employees. While some of the job growth at Sports Authority came from acquisitions, there is no doubt that these four companies created tens of thousands of jobs over the period."



  Now it's back to Rats in California for you, St. Croix, LOL.






nuguy46 266 reads
posted
48 / 50

said so very well!!!
make'em a one termer!

nuguy46 266 reads
posted
49 / 50

said so very well!!!
make'em a one termer!

LynetteMarie See my TER Reviews 388 reads
posted
50 / 50

I certainly hope not!  I'm volunteering my arse off phone banking, going door to door, etc...

Nevada was a swing state during our last election and I'm effing proud of my work and discussions with undecided voters.  So many people weren't even going to vote at all!!!  Vote for someone but sheesh, please vote!

And if more people volunteered for the candidate they support, imagine the changes that could be made!  

Namaste.

Register Now!