Washington DC

~ * ~ Chrissy ~ * ~
Flame 3561 reads
posted

Hi DC!!

Good news, Chrissy's visiting DC! I'm sorry it's such short notice but it was a last minute call. You can visit her web page at the link below.

Please try to make appointments in advance, she is going to book up quickly.  

Happy 4th of July everyone!!

I hope you all had a great weekend. :-)

Sincerely,

Heather 202-484-9526

Seems I've seen her make the rounds here before. WHy can't I find reviews?

Scaramouche, I found these with a search of Heather's number at DC Eden.

-- Modified on 7/5/2005 6:00:05 PM

I agree generally with the reviews, 7 & 7

Heather genrally contacts me to do the photography for her website.

I took the following picture yesterday (July 6, 2005) for my photographic portfolio.

I have to respectfully disagreee with your assesment but I do respect your right to your opinion.

If the attached image is of a woman that is a 7 then you all have a higher standard than I do.

That's her, I saw her last year when she was in DC last.

That glamour shot is very good indeed.  If she looked like that when I saw her then I'd have given her a 9.

I looked at your reviews and see you haven't reviewed her.

So you're the "photographer".  You've made many of the girls look very good.  You're very good at what you do.

-- Modified on 7/7/2005 11:24:12 AM

She's received a 6 and two 7's.  I never submitted a review, but I agree with the folks that did.  You don't have to agree with my opinion, that's cool.  But I'm not the only one saying it.  

I think that was the original point of my post.  That I agreed with the reviews posted.

She's a nice girl, don't get me wrong.

As to my standards, I went back and looked at my 44 posted reviews.  (I have not posted a review for everyone that I've seen.)

Here is the break down:

31% - 7's
25% - 9's
20% - 8's
13% - 6's
4.5% - 10's
4.5% - 5's
2.0% - 3

So another way to look at my tendencies:
10-9 = 30%
8-7 = 50%
6 and lower = 20%

Here are yours:
10-9 = 58%
8-7 = 42%
6 and lower = 0%

Maybe my standards are higher.  50% of the time I will give a 7 or 8 in looks.



-- Modified on 7/7/2005 12:23:49 PM

I have to say that Holli's photos don't do her justice.  I'm not saying I could do better, it's just that she was definately a knock-out in person.

Too bad she's no longer in the BIZ.

Fair criticism, to each his own, I guess. I don't expect everyone to like my work.

Holli's pics are not the best but given the circumstances that they were taken under, I think they turned out well for 20 minutes worth of work, handholding the camera, working with just natural light and a subject not use to modeling and clearly uncomfortable in front of the camera.  Also, my techniques have evolved tremendously since then. I know I would shoot her differently if given the opportunity to do so again. It also can be a simple case of the some people photographing better or worse than they look in person.

With respect to my posting of Chrissy's image, perhaps you do have a higher standard of beauty, but the guy that reads your post and your reviews may not be inclined to research enough to realize that.  Your "7" may end up costing a provider money from a client that otherwise would have seen her but was swayed by the "7" that you gave. You have the absolute right to say and post what you want. All I ask any one is to be fair and stick to facts of the session and temper the more subjective aspects of the reviews. Notice I never challenged you review of her performance.  Your experience is your experience, who am I to challenge that aspect of your assessment.

Now I'm not saying that you are not entitled to your opinion, but clearly your standards are different than mine.  Holli, for example, in my opinion is less attractive to me than Chrissy.  You obviously disagree with that.  Fine. But your opinion is not more valid than mine nor mine more valid than yours.

My post was a simple rebuttal to your post. It simply lets the image match up against your posted opinion which lets others decide for themselves. It was not a personal attack and I'm sorry if you took it that way.

I can only do so much for a model in an image – you have to have a good subject to begin with. You can only glamorize so much without it being obvious. Notice that you never said she did not look like the picture. I really don't do much to the model as I do treatment more for style. This is especially true for these kind of images where a fair representation is critical. She really looks this way and should she not present herself in a glamorous light?  Maybe she was off when you saw her last, everyone has a bad day every once and a while, but that did not have to do with how she looked but with how she performed.

If you are confident in your assessment of Chrissy's appearance then let your words stand against the image.  If others feel that it’s true then it proves your point.  If they feel otherwise then that doesn’t mean that you lose face or respect, it just means that other’s disagree with your assessment.

...and in no way do I ever feel a loss of "face or respect" by what is posted here by you or by anyone.

My reviews are my reviews.  There are enough who have read them to know my taste and accuracy of what I write.  Many things in life are subjective, I certainly understand that.

Bottom line...

I have no interest in affecting(positively or negatively) the financial well-being of Chrissy or DC Eden.  

I have no personal or professional affiliation with Chrissy or DC Eden.

I write reviews to share information and I post on this board to share my opinions REGARDLESS of what it may or may not do to influence someone else's decision or an agency's/provider's success or failure.

Can you say the same?

I said I probably couldn't do a better job than you.

Here are her ratings:

DATE: REVIEWER: APPEARANCE:  PERFORMANCE:
Jul 2004   asianinfo 8 - Really Hot 9 - I forgot it was a service
Jun 2004   NORTH POLL 9 - Model Material 6 - Nice Time
Jun 2004   epicurean1 7 - Attractive 8 - Went the extra mile
Jun 2004   fhfhfhfhfh5 9 - Model Material 9 - I forgot it was a service
Jun 2004   2Yd4U 6 - Nice 7 - Hot Time
Jun 2004   wip 8 - Really Hot 9 - I forgot it was a service
May 2004   Occularblues 7 - Attractive 7 - Hot Time
May 2004   s73837 10 - One in a Lifetime 9 - I forgot it was a service
May 2004   jnglmn123 8 - Really Hot 7 - Hot Time
May 2004   JT1896 9 - Model Material 9 - I forgot it was a service
May 2004   rdmdc2000 8 - Really Hot 9 - I forgot it was a service
Mar 2004   dcanon 7 - Attractive 8 - Went the extra mile


I don't seem to be in the minority on Holli's looks.

An 8 or higher = 9 people
A 7 = 3 people
A 6 or lower = 1 person

-- Modified on 7/7/2005 7:42:41 PM

Register Now!