The agency has some standards on the GFE prerequisites. While it can be a YMMV, I've got a regrettable date from EM.

A review was just posted of Perla, who turns about to be Laura, a long time visitor of EM. Dude said he was a bit miffed but of course still had a good time with her, as most do. Rather odd of her to change her name at the same agency though I  believe it’s been done there before…

Laura, according to this review.  

https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/laura-350252

Maybe she decided to “rebrand” herself?

I saw that review also - I was interested in seeing her - pics look great - but not doubting the review- but pics looked leaner than Laura- admit it’s odd of name change- usually name change is a red flag- but Laura’s reviews are great so not sure if the reason

Well, “Perla” is no longer in the rotation, so we will have to wait for if and when she decides to return to potentially get a second opinion. Three possibilities:

1) Reviewer is/was mistaken that Perla is Laura
2) Laura has decided to “re-brand” and Perla IS Laura (Another review for Laura was just posted but the reviewer doesn’t mention requesting Perla)  
3) EM did a bait and switch. Reviewer requested to book Perla, but for whatever reason, they substituted Laura instead.  

I find option 2 weird. Like another poster said, Laura has a number of fantastic reviews solo, as well as doubles with Valeria. Are they going to start advertising a Perla/Valeria duo if Laura is Perla?

Unrelated to the Perla/Laura imbroglio, EM had a model here recently named Mariana who I wanted to see, but missed out on. A review for her popped up, albeit under the incorrect profile. Pictures are totally different:

https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/isabella---mariana-354638

The “new” Mariana who was here recently had a distinctive tattoo on her derrière.