I'm just stating the accepted norm. Sexyzara2012 that worked at ST posted about it 7 years ago.  

 

In a review DigDirkler talked about a supposed past experience at ST in which he said things changed up for him the current visit. What was the point of mentioning supposed activity if it was not even the current experience? TER should have rejected the review in the first place for not being current...the current review was a sentence or two.  

Dirkler has posted on TER a long time and been to ST many times...he knows better. If accurate (but his board posts in a thread 3 years ago doesn't align with that being the case in his world...it's a lie somewhere. Hmmm.)...Sounded like ego reviewing and trying to get the reviews for the lady turned off cause him being a self admitted semi regular got cut off from supposed activity....or perhaps cut off from something else. Obviously her reviews were turned off shorty after...and anyone experienced could see it coming.  

Dirkler could have bragged about not paying extra if he was in that boat. Guess he's in a different boat.... especially having to plan the other activity at the end of that review in advance, ha.

Point is YMMV at anytime and let's not touch third rails...or borderline into humiliation due to a level of submission.  

Another review of said girl talking COF was unnecessarily detailed for the PV scene and seemed somewhat ego stroking. But based on things...I don't think dude has been active on this forum before a few months ago.

Did you write this, or cut and paste from a 7 year old posting?

And what do you mean by a review getting turned off? Is it the provider delisting? Or a provider challenging a review as fake and having that review taken down?

I wrote the post.

ST girls delist and I mentioned Zara that worked there bringing it up 7 years ago on this board. The girls in general feel many of the reviews go too far.  

Then I brought up a DigDirkler review from a month ago...and the review of another guy about said girl. She delisted shorty after. Dirkler knew that kind of review would make her delist...and I questioned the validity of the review and saw it as an ego play on many fronts. Dude talked about a supposed past encounter and had two sentences for the current encounter...and TER approved it, lol.

it was honest, and I was only willing to post it because things changed and I hadn't wanted to share such a good thing before.  my activity had decreased, and she was just who I had experience with to review, period.   not some big complex game or strategy, and a little odd to give a toss about anonymous bragging.  but whatever, this is a search engine to find good intel on p to p, not a "community" or whatever for me.  happy hunting

TER was a community when you were going back and forth on these boards with rodtidwell/turdwell/turdy...lol. TER was a community when you pulled up stats on black people/men about girls saying no AA allowed when BP was around. So Don't switch it up now.

Like I said...your responses in a thread from the past doesn't align with said experience being possible for you...and you made fun of others that even entertained it. And considering you gave the girl an 8 in looks you was not overwhelmed enough to change your stance. Maybe you lied in the thread...and therefore you have less credibility on these boards...

However, your recent review of a girl elsewhere had you talking about a malfunction and you talking about safety precautions by both sides, lol. So maybe in reality you lied on the girl at ST cause you seem cautious elsewhere...hmmm.  

 

 
And you do have known issues regarding how you deal with women...

A lady's word on you:
"he was very humiliating and made fun of my baby phat he also gave me a black eye and insited on not paying.he left me bruised with no pay and he is a regular poster and a reviewer. he has 34 reviews and most of them i think are lies.if he doesnt like your appereance he will put his hands on you."

Your words reviewing a girl:  
"feels quite prickly and itchy with stubble... black women have very course hair..not the smooth skin one wants."

 

 
End of the day your review at ST was not done with good intentions no matter how you slice it... definition of passive aggressive. Your other reviews of girls don't even follow that format of talking about a supposed past and then dedicating a couple sentences to the present, ha.... should have never been approved. You wanted to create problems for her...you were definitely mad about something. You felt entitled and you pissed on the carpet like a puppy.  

Reviews help to make the community...and getting profiles deactivated makes for less intel, which is selfish. Plus touching third rails (likely false in your case) can turn off clients or create unreal expectations...you know better! Hope you can mature in these parts 2021 and beyond with respect for lady and clients.

Wow, you are dedicated, that must have taken a while to write and research.   That quote from whoever she (he) is, is total bs and if I recall was revenge for accurate stats on black men. But yeah, I'm really upset you're deflating my evil genius scheme to get people I don' t know all impressed by the exploits of a pseudonym they don't know- curses, uh, foiled again?

You were right, looks like they delisted all their reviews.