WTH is wrong with some people? Like how are you a reviewer on here and still go see escorts with red flags? I see ladies with under 8 averages, with multiple reviewers giving 6s or less, and they keep getting more mediocre reviews. The only exception to this rule that might have some logic is kgirls because we know some of you all like them better than others. So, naturally they will have some lower reviews and still be liked by kgirl purists. But aside from them, I don’t get why anyone who reviews and reads reviews would see an escort below an 8. Okay okay. One more exception, if her recent reviews are all higher and it’s older reviews holding her average down. But even then not sure I would risk it.

Maybe it is bc that is all the guy can afford, maybe it's bc he finds her attractive and you don't, maybe he is attracted to her open mind and wide menu, maybe it's her ease of verification options, her personality, maybe her incall is close to his home or work, maybe it's bc she doesn't ask for a deposit, etc. Maybe it's due to all of the above or some of the above.
.
But I have to ask, respectfully, why do you care? I don't care whom you choose to see or anyone else. I am seriously asking...why does it bother you if you aren't seeing those girls?

We all know the scoring system favors BBBJ, LFK/DFK, anal, and really bi sessions.
So a "safe" provider CAN'T get more than a 7 in performance.

Recent trajectory of the scores is more important than the overall average.  It's expected that, like anything else, the more experience they get, the better the service will become, providing they do not burn out, but even burnout creates a downward recent trajectory, so that is a red flag as well.  

I have never had someone book with me and said they were doing so because of my review score. I have had gentlemen say they have read my reviews (I do have a link on my website and my email signature line) but I have honestly never had anyone comment on my actual score. The only thing that has really perplexed me is when a "provider" has a rip off review and STILL has gents try to book and shockingly they get ripped off also. Someone already TOFTF and warned you, no need to continue busting your own balls, bud.

I get what you're trying to say but everyone makes their own choices. Whether I agree with the choice or not really doesn't matter and I don't think you can impose your rationality on someone else in this particular case. It's not like some clear engineering type problem with univerally accepted metrics on the outputs, inputs and relationship between them.

A seven is still a good score. Even a six is above average. Maybe you subscribe to modern reviews where anything below 8 is garbo? But that's not how ter scoring works.

Something gonna magically  change some how. Make changes, don't be cheap, travel sometimes. Great providers out there.

That’s a lot of maybes. Maybe anything about any opinion? But sure, I will dissect your maybes. Afford would imply this only happens with cheaper escorts. False. Finds her attractive and I don’t? Also false. There are some I find quite attractive. But I don’t see attractive escorts with bad reviews. Her open mind and wide menu? That’s rather presumptuous to think those with worse reviews are more open minded and have wider menus. Personally, I have found the opposite to be true. In fact, I have found that sometimes less attractive providers get higher marks because of their open menus. Doesn’t ask for a deposit? Really Robert? Come on. You know better. Only a small percentage ask for deposits. I’m confident this is not a reason to go with a provider with worse reviews.

The problem is these guys also rate them low after seeing them, and often their reviews reflect the same reasons that were written about in previous reviews. This isn’t a matter of difference in what they are attracted to nor is it because of TER limits, as many provide services that at least can net them 9s. It would be different if they saw them and as a result rated them higher. That would seem more like a difference in taste.

I get what you’re saying about how the points work, but when you read the reviews it doesn’t come across as though they had a good time and were happy with the experience. I rarely find someone with a 7.5 average, for example, where what was written suggests she is a good provider.

Over The Hill Fat Broads

on the side while she was on "Bewitched?"

You're not really asking this question out of curiosity or interest. You're making clear that any player who doesn't play like you do is doing something wrong. You're entitled to make that judgment I suppose; we can't stop you.  But at least be man enough to own your criticism rather than hiding behind the oft-deployed deflection tactic of "I'm just asking."  And the rest of us will exercise our right to ignore your judgment in favor of our own choices.

I suppose I should take my own advice. You're going to keep seeing things your way for your reasons.

Yes, I have no idea why my brain always confuses the two names but I'm sure I will once again in the future be thinking about Angus Young from the rock band and the Agnus Moorehead will be the name that pops up in my head.

Seems a bit uninformed but just my 2 cents. You refer to them as "bad" reviews But you are ONLY going by the score. Veterans here know not to just look at scores but actually read the reviews. Not ONLY that but they look at profiles AND pm reviewers to get more info than what you are seeing.  
.
You admitted you find some of them attractive. But thats something that SOME guys ONLY need. That is the point you are missing. Some JUST want someone they think is hot and they dont care as much about performance or personality.  
.
And I never said women with "worse reviews are more open minded." What I did say is that maybe some of the girls that you dont think have good reviews, possibly offer more options, sexually, and that is what those guys are looking for. Maybe they provide FBSM, maybe BDSM, maybe anal, or swallow or whatever. and THAT is why they see them, even with what you would call "bad reviews."
.
You are sadly mistaken if you don't think girls who dont ask for deposits get more attention from certain men, even those with lesser scores. It's not a "small" percentage anymore who ask for them. In many places, like NYC, Philly, it is more the norm now. 5 years ago I would have agreed but not now.
.
You are too score centric. There are many, many reason why guys see women that you would deem are not worthy of your money. I have already laid them out for you. You need to see the much, much bigger picture and maybe at this point you are just not capable? Not sure. As usual, thanks for your take.

Some Hobbyists may not like all of what a Provider does, but the Hobbyist knows that that Provider could be his (The Hobbyist) last resorts for getting his nuts off.  

I am 100% not only going by the score, and some of my previous comments, which I suppose you chose not to read, already addressed this fact. I always read reviews before passing judgment. This is not a case of saying good things and giving low scores. I have seen a rare number of reviews where they have consistent 7s and 8s, making their average scores low, by the comments suggest the service might actually be good. What I see more often is not only are they at a under 8 average, but they have a few reviews with a 5 or less in one or both of the categories. And, when you read the reviews, the reviewers make it clear they felt the escorts were below average at best. As I said before, they go see them and in their reviews express some of the same disappointments as previous reviewers.

Lmao, man enough? Way to swing with insults. WTH isn't judgmental on these boards? Or, in life? What did I say to ever suggest anything I say is not a form of judgment? Can one not be both baffled and judgmental? Because if you actually asked me, instead of making assumptions, I would have said what I will say, "Fuck yeah I am being judgmental." But being judgmental doesn't change that I am baffled. I am baffled not because anyone sees them. I am baffled because they see them and then complain about the same things previous reviewers complained about. Do you not see the issue here? Idgaf if you read a review and feel like the things that bothered someone else won't bother you and see the provider and give her a better review. That to me would a difference of opinion, which absolutely is anyone's right.  

If anyone is the contrarian here, it is you. No one is really agreeing with you. That doesn't make you wrong, as sometimes the herd gets it right and sometimes the herd goes over the cliff. lol.

I wouldn't say no one is, but sure most are not. But they are arguing an interpretation of what I am saying that I am not saying. Look, whether 7.5 is bad for me or not is not relivent. If it is good for someone else then I expect that when I read their review it will support this and then make sense. And yes, I have seen reviews where the escort was given 7-7, and the reviewer said he had a good time with no complaints, and even said he would repeat. Nothing to question or not understand when he does this in his review. But I keep saying they are not saying they had a good time and not being complementary with their words. They are saying they had a bad time and complaining, and they are repeating the same complaints that previous reviews pointed out. It's not just about the number score, but the number score can be the first clue. But of course it's always important to read the details to truly understand.

There still could be many reasons.

Oh absolutely. I have seen this happen multiple times. Usually, when I see this, it's 3-5 reviews though and they are all around the same time. I'm seeing ones with 20+ reviews spread over months, and sometimes years, though. I have even seen comments where the reviewer said, "maybe I should have listened to the other reviews."  

"Seems like a kick yourself in the ass moment if you read some reviews, don't like what you read, see the provider anyway, and then complain about the exact same thing previous reviewers already complained about.
"

I get it. Not all circumstances are the same. What you say can very well be true. But is it true in every case like what I described? While no one can answer this with any proof, my guess is no.  

I only post a review if I have positive things to say. Most ladies give me positive things to say

No review at all when your review WOULD NOT be positive gives providers with poor service a pass and the opportunity to fleece other unsuspecting customers, which you COULD have helped prevent be reviewing the subpar ladies you have seen.   This sounds like a, "Fuck the rest of you, every man for himself" attitude, IMO, and knowing that is the way you approach reviewing, you have made your whole review history irrelevant to the rest of the membership.  It's like the guys here who gives every provider they see a perfect score.  

As no one can possibly speak for "everyone." Remember some of those reviews can be fake just to get 15 free days, some could be from guys who are not mentally well, some guys may not have seen those previous reviews, or didn't have VIP at the time, or may have been brand new, etc etc etc. Thats the issue though. There are just so many factors and possibilities. Qwerty's answer was spot on and I wish I came up with that analogy.

And that is the thing. All these maybes are obvious. I'm sure some of them apply to some of the reviews. But proving which apply and where is not likely something any of us can do. But I don't feel these disprove what I am saying as well. Some are just making bad decisions and might not have a good explanation. Again, I can't prove this either. In the end, we are all just throwing opinions around that we cannot prove, but for some reason the mentality seems to be gang up and prove the OP wrong.

It could be said you are trying to prove everyone else wrong. I don't see anyone ganging up on you as that makes it sound personal. They just disagree with you, and they did respectfully, based on their own experiences.  
.
From my perspective, when you said "I don’t get why anyone who reviews and reads reviews would see an escort below an 8" that is what caused the issue. You were given a dozen reasons or more about why that occurred and yet you keep stubbornly pushing back on everyone. You also said there was something "wrong" with them. That was shown to you that that is not necessarily the case,  and yet again, you keep fighting back.
.
Just thought you might want an answer to your last sentence.

OP voices an opinion.  
Others voice their contrary opinion.  
OP insists all other opinions are wrong and everyone else is too dumb to understand.  
Others voice thought that opinions are neither objectively wrong or right.
OP insists his opinion is not an opinion, therefore must be correct  
Thread continues until it's in a single-word-thin column.

low-volume snowflakes here too seriously.  As you and I both know, the more experience you get and the more variety of providers you see, the more careful we are in analyzing reviews in order to keep our disappointments and mistakes to a minimum.  I'm often left SMH, too, when there are plenty of red flags on a particular provider and then the last guy who saw her writes a review about how bad she was.    

I mean, I pretty much only see kgirls nowadays, but if I get canceled on last minute at 10pm at night, are there really that many options? Even in LA?

who are wrong are too inexperienced or too unintelligent to KNOW they are wrong.

Actually, I performed under that pseudonym during my porn career. I also appeared as A. Pismo Clam.

Some were respectful, but not all. I assume you are just saying this and not actually reading all the comments, so not surprised you would say that. But when I am told I am not baffled, but judgmental, deflecting, and not man enough, I don't feel respect is being given. But go on and feel that's respectful.

You're overthinking it.  It's a simple approval vote. If I had a good time, I post a positive review. If I didn't, I don't post a review. That means I help the ladies I had a great time with and do no harm to anyone else.