Which will totally change a lot the "Top 100" rankings. Explaining this to one my ATFs, who IS on the national Top 100 list, with a score (deservedly) well about 9.67, she considered this and said,
"All of a sudden there's going to be a lot more anal."
Hi everyone
So I've noticed since the new site has been up that providers now has five different "scores" listed on their profile page. I understand that the "Looks" and "Performance" scores comes from the reviews, but what about the "Rating", "Chemistry", and "Location" numbers? I thought at first that the "Rating" was just the the mean of the "Looks" and "Performance" score, but it seems to sit slightly higher than that for most providers. Anyone know what's up with this? Thanks!
~Rach
Under the previous rating system, Rating was strictly an average of the Looks and Performance scores.
My theory about the new rating system is that it is an average of three numbers: Looks, Performance, and Chemistry+Location. I tried plugging in a variety of provider rating to see if it worked. Some providers didn't have any Chemistry and/or Location ratings yet, so their Rating is still using the old system. Most of the others worked out exactly as my theory predicted, but there were a couple of cases where my predicted Rating was little off. Maybe Chemistry gets a little more weight than Location, or something like that.
The formula for the new rating system is
Rating= (Look+ Performance + ( Location+Chemistry))/3
so if performance is 9, looks are a 9. location is 4 and chemistry is a 4
Rating = (9+9+(4+4))/3 = 26/3=8.66666666667=8.67
-- Modified on 5/4/2017 12:45:01 PM
....if a gal changes location, how does that get updated? We all know how it takes an arm and a leg to get any gal's profile changed from what the original reviewer provided. Also, as I said in another post, I feel that "chemistry" should be a part of the performance number. In addition with respect to location, my opinion is that there should be a profile catagory noting such things as: street parking restrictions, traffic, etc. This would give us members an idea of how much time we need to allow as we head to our appointments. Ciao,
Seems to me that Chemistry is already part of the performance rating, so giving that another 17% of the overall rating is a bit distorting. Also, I wish they'd split looks into two different scores...one for face and one for body.
Remember this:
If you head was on fire and your feet where on a block of ice - our average temperature may be OK.
Which will totally change a lot the "Top 100" rankings. Explaining this to one my ATFs, who IS on the national Top 100 list, with a score (deservedly) well about 9.67, she considered this and said,
"All of a sudden there's going to be a lot more anal."