Ok so I have this problem with a reviewer just posted about me. Everything in the review was pretty much accurate. But the way he worded it made it seem like the whole session was during without protection.
I DON'T OFFER THAT! And I don't want any or all guys that want that service to contact me. And I definitely don't want to scare away any potential gentlemen that frown on any provider that provides that service.So any helpful info would be greatly appreciated. And I've already send a private message to the reviewer on here. And I can't text him because I don't know his relationship status. So I don't want to text him at an inappropriate time.
I think I see what you mean. If the reviewer is agreeable to minor additions: "... then covered up ..." and a while later "... pulled off the cover and ..." then I think, I HOPE, that TER would allow the guy to do that. That doesn't change his overall evaluation (changing things from a 6 to a 10 because he was threatened somehow).
.
TER: IF HE WANTS TO DO SO, LET HIM MAKE THE SIMPLE CORRECTION!
.
A while ago, an ambiguous review like that would default to "covered, even if he didn't explicitly say covered." I guess today, many readers might jump to the "he didn't say covered, so it must be BB" conclusion.
Ok so I have this problem with a reviewer just posted about me. Everything in the review was pretty much accurate. But the way he worded it made it seem like the whole session was during without protection.
I DON'T OFFER THAT! And I don't want any or all guys that want that service to contact me. And I definitely don't want to scare away any potential gentlemen that frown on any provider that provides that service.
So any helpful info would be greatly appreciated.
And I've already send a private message to the reviewer on here. And I can't text him because I don't know his relationship status. So I don't want to text him at an inappropriate time.
-- Modified on 11/12/2017 5:30:37 AM
interested in meeting. If your other reviews are inclusive with "... then we covered up before entering her ..." you should be fine.
Obviously, the correction to your questionable review is the gold standard.
It happens quite a lot, just based on reviews I read and I don't read that many these days.
GUYS, MENTION THE FUCKING COVER!
However, after reading this guy's other reviews, I think you should feel lucky that not mentioning a cover was the worst thing that happened.
I've had dates where she applied the cover so smoothly... I had to look to know that she had, in fact, done so. I was much less scruplious about writing this in reviews back then... I am now.
You do in fact have a good point, worthy of correction.
I've had dates where she applied the cover so smoothly... I had to look to know that she had, in fact, done so. I was much less scruplious about writing this in reviews back then... I am now.
You do in fact have a good point, worthy of correction.
.
And I agree that a short while back, most of us assumed "covered" even if not explicitly stated. Today, readers are assuming "not covered" unless it is explicitly stated otherwise. I wonder ... should TER add a REQUIRED checkbox to force reviewers to say what's up on this topic? Or add a boldface message to the Juicy Details title bar: "Reviews w/o explicit mention of condom status will be rejected." or something like that.
-- Modified on 11/13/2017 2:31:35 AM
... a few months ago.
Good suggestion, by the way.
Guaranteed to be ignored by TER as are most of the good suggestions.
cum in the pussy was miss leading. I can see why you're a little salty. Honestly, if I would of read the review with not knowing I wouldn't have assumed you offer BBFS.
I have a review that came off very misleading and I did not have many reviews at the time. The reviewer has been removed from TER for inaccurate or fake reviews and mine has been since removed. However, I had many many requests for FSBB after he posted it. Some hobbyist even got angry with me when I told them I DO NOT DO THAT. It's just another bump in the road.