I don't think that would be a good idea.

If you mean generically discuss hobbyists, yeah I'm an advocate of providers posting under aliases.  

Especially, if you already know "a lot of what they think in private." Although I question how you know this.  

I'm not aware of any business that openly critiques its clientele. Besides, why ruin the fantasy?

Many stories you don't want to hear.  I know because I've heard a few and stopped asking.  Walking guys around the room on a leash came up fairly often.

at their disposal for learning about various clients, but for obvious reasons names should not be mentioned in an open forum such as this one.  These are ostensibly for the purpose of protecting providers from dangerous and/or rip-off clients, but I suppose there may be an occasional reference to the client's likability and/or sexual prowess.   I'm glad these exist.

 
In any case,  it is a false equivalency to state that since clients review providers, the reverse is fair.   Clients pay providers for a service, not vice versa.

The whole point of hobbyists reviewing providers is to ensure the safety and financial wellbeing of both parties. Clients need to know if a given provider is a cop, isn't going to scam/rob them, and performs well, and reviews provide that information. This serves a useful function that benefits both the clients and the providers.

What purpose would providers reviewing clients serve? The most obvious flaw is that while we as clients can write a negative review on a provider and move on to another girl with (arguably) no consequences, providers depend on hobbyists for their earnings. If a provider were to dish out info online on each hobbyist they met, this would cause other hobbyists to second guess ever meeting her. If she openly badmouths her clients and the clients find out, then they would simply stop meeting her, which means she'll lose customers. Ultimately she would have to just say that all her clients are great guys with big dicks that know how to fuck and are super handsome and awesome and made her cum at least 3 or 4 times. The whole thing would be a waste of time.  

The only time a provider should "review" a client is when letting other girls know that said client is dangerous or a time waster. That information would serve a useful purpose, and honestly an Alert board wouldn't be a bad idea, but otherwise there's no point beyond curiosity.    

Escorts Already Discuss Clients

That's why they ask for references. Not sure what purpose airing recaps of clients on sites like this would serve, we're the customers. And I really couldn't care less what an escort thinks of me in secret. I act in a civil manner, don't exceed her limits and pay, she provides the agreed upon escort services.

MfSD>>>>

HOWEVER blacklists should continue to exist for our safety, since in the US we get no protection from the law,.

if the "performance" score only goes up to 10.  However, the "appearance" score should only go up to 5.   Just my opinion.  

I think it's a great idea would love to hear what they say about me. If I was not doing something they didn't like I have no problem hearing about it. And I know I don't match up with all the providers. And would be interesting if they would tell the truth or lie like a lot of reviews to make someone happy.

compare notes.  I hava buncha WhiteListings and I’ll occasionally provide references.  I’ve wondered exactly what Providers discuss with each other about me.  Must be good as I’ve never been turned down and several have told me “they really like you!”
One of my Faves suggested my alias - Mr.M.Johnson.  The “M” is for “Magic.”   No, I’m not the ex-Laker.  It’s the nickname for my “Johnson!” - ladies like my Johnson and what it does for them!  

Interesting question. As a provider, I am not sure if I would have any time available to actually do this. The type of gentleman that make me melt and rock my world are men who enjoy passion and sensuality as much as I do. Men who are in a hurry tend to not light my fire.

This is a group of wonderful women providing an amazing fantasy service. Mostly better sex than most of us are likely to ever have otherwise. In my case anyway.

I want the truth from a woman that I have a real life relationship with. But, it's only an ego trip to want to hear that I'm an excellent lover.  
And, I'm pretty sure that the ladies I play with give me direction  on how to pleasure them. That's all I need.

Thanks ladies.  

I was once told by a provider what the reference she gave me said. It had something about being a good guy and be ready for the whole hour to be taken up with play.
Whoopee!

This sounds like pure entertainment! I would certainly feel a sense of schadenfreude. These ladies do a tough job, and I applaud their efforts.  

Perhaps a slightly more innocuous question for the ladies. What percentage of your clients do you find yourself "genuinely" sexually attracted to?

She continues to see you and you have no problems paying for new dates what do you need to know?

Do you want to hear that your tongue action is top notch or that your fuck meat is the best they have ever had inside them?  They will tell you whatever you want to hear until one of two things, you get bored of them or they need a break from you.  

Don't kid yourself.

Funny this comes up, I daydreamed up an idea for a 'week in review' cam show during which I discuss the week before, the week ahead as a way for my 7 fans to keep up wish me.  
In the process I take a review, mine or another's and walk it backwards through what happened Sort of like a informal tongue in cheeks, I mean cheek, Judge Judy entertainment arbitration and critique.
Each segment gives you a take home message so they are entertaining and can benefit everyone.  
Client's handle is used only.  

Those who have nothing to worry about will not be worried.  
Those who are scared that providers will out their behavior? Ya. Just don't give them a reason to and it won't happen.

Like to think we are all mature enough here that we could be honest. BUT let's be real here...if a provider had a client that was less than stellar and reviewed him accordingly, she would be crucified. We can't be honest in the forums without being labeled a bitch or spoiled etc. For the most part my reviews on clients would be good. I screen and see clients based on our interstes..but every once in a while a not great one pops up.  

I have noticed that when a provider says anything opposite of blowing smoke up a jons ass..all hell breaks loose. No thanks. About 80%of the time I erase or rewrite my forum posts or comments. No need to create WW3 bc someone doesn't value my opinion or thinks I'm being (insert whatever)

As for honesty. I'm brutally honest with clients because #1 I don't have a sensor, #2 Life is to short to bullshit #3 my clients love that I am authentic.   I just choose to save that for private or email chat..my forum persona is a bit more honey lol..

Reviewing a client would have to be completely different. Because we are both looking for completely different things from each other. We are the ones advertising what we look like, what services we offer, what our personalities are like, what a date might be like, Etc.

Clients are looking for what is advertised, escorts are looking to be paid for what is advertised. Obviously many also don't want to be treated like s***.

If reviewing clients became the norm I would leave the hobby. I don't mind provider only black lists as ladies must be able to warn each other. I like the reference system. As bad clients must be weeded out. Heck, I'll even give a lady real 8nfo and let her talk to my wife. I don't even have an issue with datechecks number system OKs. But If I find out she ever reviewed a client of hers, It is a hard pass.

I have never reviewed a provider without her consent. And unless I feel I need to sound the warning bell, that will remain true. But i feel the person handing over the money has the right to review.  In fact the only industry I know of where reviews of the customer is the norm is the credit industry where they are the ones handing out the money  (with the hope of being paid back with interest of course.) In every other industry I am familiar with only consumers review.

On top of that, part of what is being paid for is for the lady to be discrete. The least discrete thing she could do is review the guy. It isn't like we have a advertised stage name like the ladies. To identify most of us to make them remotely useful she would have to use information that can be traced back to use as many guys don't belong to a screening or review site.  

And in the fact many guys will not return if a review isn't epic killing all incentive to be remotely honest. Thus removing any use they may have. And some unstable guys could retaliate against the provider putting her at risk. The reviews would be useless and pit the lady at additional risk. Not a good combo.

In short I am very against the idea of any provider in any industry reviewing their costumers and this goes double in any industry where being outed ruins lives.

would be greatly appreciated. On other review sites, there is an option for providers to comment on reviews they've received, this verifies them as real, allows them to publicly refute them if they are not, say thanks and verify the review for the hobbyist, which would lead to more ladies accept a ter handle as screening if there are verified reviews. i think its a simple feature that would allow a lot more functionality.

Somehow I doubt they would be as juicy and sugar coated as hobbyists reviews!!😍

Some of you boasting of your sexual exploits and skills would be exposed.You would have to face the reality that what you thought was real was just a theatrical act to satisfy
Your ego.