Suggestion and Policy

Q&A for providers Only Board?
nobody305 942 reads
posted

How would you feel if Ter would start a board for us guys to ask stupid question to providers about any subject that they want. For example how many of you ladies enjoy sucking a guy off?

The way I am thinking it would work is for providers would be the only one able to answer the question. Some how make it when they do answer with their fake real names would not show up with their answer. In hope that they would answer the question more honestly due to the fact they don't have to worry about any backlash due to their answer on a board.  

Open to any Ideals about this or do you think this is a good ideal or not.

Thank you and Happy Monday to all

If so, that could also be inhibiting.

Not sure if it is feasible to construct a board this way, but you'd need a board where only providers could see the initial poster (the questioner), and then only that poster would see each provider's answer.  Rather than a board, it could be part of the PM system whereby a questioner could contact all providers who decide to opt in to this feature, and then be able to each reply my PM to the questioner.  Both the questioner and the respondent could use an alias I suppose to further encourage frankness.

It might be a useful marketing tool for the provider.

In all honesty, I think the questioner would also not want to have other clients see his question either, at least in some cases

Wait a minute...

I think I read the OP differently than you. I thought they said for the answers to appear anonymously, but not necessarily so that only the questioner could see it. I thought they were saying for the answers to be public yet anonymous. I suppose the questions could be made to be anonymous too.

Seems like the easiest way would be to create a board, maybe call it the dear Abby board. Questions could be PM'd to a board host who could post them, then post any answers providers send in.

I suppose it could be automated to post new threads without a handle attached and then only allow handles registered as providers to respond, but give them a random number or something when the responses post, rather than display the handle. The only reason for a number is follow up questions I guess. So if a provider posted in the same thread more than once, you could see those thoughts were from the same person. But that number would not follow said provider from thread to thread.

Does that make any sense? Is that what you were envisioning, OP?  I dunno how hard that would be to setup.

to give gals an incentive to respond, they might want their handles shown to the questioner so that he will know what they are willing to do, etc.  I suppose she could have an option to be anonymous if she feels a need for this

Sure, they could opt in or out of the anonymity if they wanted. If they want the questioner and only the questioner to see their answer, and if we're talking about "what they're willing to do", I thought we already had a system for that. You post an ISO on the ISO, or your regional board and say PM if you don't want to answer here. Que no?

I thought the OP was talking about stuff that would be interesting general discussion but that the ladies may be shy to weigh in on for fear of backlash/lost business, like we've seen in the GD the last few days. Maybe not. My bad.

if the questioner wanted anonymity, the gal wouldn't be able to PM him.

She could if the OP used alias.

The more I think about this, I think Lopaw is right. People ask stuff on the GD and elsewhere that we all know the majority of providers just aren't going to answer because it could alienate people. Of course they could use alias and chime in but it seems few do. Probably because interacting here anonymously does nothing to promote their business, and there's nothing wrong with that. I don't think making some complicated board system is going to get many more answers to these types of questions than what's available now, but that's just me.

Or we try Courtney's idea. That old woman is hysterical!

nobody305400 reads

My thought that we would get more honest answer from a group of providers that did not have to worry about any backlash from a answer on the gb board.

Posted By: nobody305
My thought that we would get more honest answer from a group of providers that did not have to worry about any backlash from a answer on the gb board.
"My thought that we would get LESS honest, MORE sarcastic, or MORE vicious answers from a group of providers and others that did not have to worry about any backlash from a answer on the gb board."

Atomic energy will save the world! Or blow it up.
GM foods will save the world! Or destroy some ecosystems.
Encrypted cell phone technology will protect our freedom of speech! Or strengthen terrorism.
DDT saved millions of people from contracting malaria and other diseases! But it nearly wiped out a number of animal species.

Be careful what you wish for ... you might get it

nobody305394 reads

More or less

Posted By: nobody305
I hope that they would answer the question more honestly due to the fact they don't have to worry about any backlash due to their answer on a board.
"... they would answer the question with MORE sarcasm or dishonesty or viciousness (attributes that never characterize posts on the current "open" boards) due to the fact that they don't have to worry about any backlash.

nobody305296 reads

You are right about that. But if in a prefect world and there was a board were only provider could reply back to the op I would hope that they would give an honest answer to the question. Because they would not have to worry about any backlash or hurt their business.

I still have to go back to why? You want honesty in a relationship entirely premises on creating a fantasy? I just don't get it. If you like getting you dick sucked and the provider finds this is  a service that is required in the market but not really one she's into she has two choices - pretend or not do it and work in a smaller market of Johns.

Who get any benefit from this honesty, especially if it's anonymous? It's also most like you're hoping to generate some data set of preferences from some survey analysis.

nobody305351 reads

I have a few question I would like to ask a group of providers. I don't want to ask them on the gb because I feel I would not get an honest answer to my question. Due to fact I feel it would be to controversial of a subject. I also feel that if I could get some honest answer to my question it would help me understand women better and make me a better client.

Bwahahahaahahahahahahaha!
Bwahahahahahahahahahaha!
Bwahahahahahahahahahahaha!
I'm sorry, was I laughing out loud? Oh excuse me.
Bwahahahahaha! 😂😂

You'll probably have much better luck if you get to know a number of providers fairly well (spend a lot of money) and talk with them about what they like/don't like. If they begin to trust you you'll start getting better answers.

That said, help you understand women better? In what sense -- so you can talk to women in the civie setting better? Know how to tell them what you like/don't like sexually? So you can hopefully turn these providers on and make them fall in love with you?....

For some reason this suggestion is making me think of some lyrics from an old Green Day song.

What does this really get the community or site?

That asked, I don't see why this cannot asked on the General or Regional boards and if the goal. There are already ways to hide one's user ID, an alias, which the providers can use but if for some reason they don't think they can be honest with that perhaas TER could implement a "generic" alias that all providers can use and call it "Provider Response" (and give it a different color if they want).  I don't think this will change any of the answers so don't see why any effort would be spent for it though.

Register Now!