Anyone else find “Photos accurate” less than sufficient? I know that some reviewers use “accurate” to mean “roughly equivalent” without necessarily meaning “photo of the actual provider.” For that matter, “photo of the actual provider” doesn’t necessarily ensure “roughly equivalent.” Any chance of getting TER to have both?
This is one of them. I get the info you seek from pm, as that is a much more reliable way to get the most accurate, and current, info possible.
Twitter, Instagram and current (once or twice a year updates pix and I don't see how you can expect anybody but the girl who's depicting herself.
Hell I've been doing LDR packages for ages and all the gentlemen so far have ended up booking. It's hella sexy to video one another weeks leading up to a meeting
They had a chance with the new TER and chose to go with this option only.
IMHO, it's even less useful than the "build" description jumping from slender to athletic to six versions of fat.
Look for selfies and videos rather than glamor shots and PM other mongers for the scoop.
What really frustrates me is when I have seen a provider whose profile was marked as not accurate, and she really is the girl in the unblurred ad pic, but TER won't change her profile (possibly because she once used a fake pic 5 years ago).
I have gotten SO many free sessions by telling girls with fake pix they owe me a freebie. And they ALWAYS keep their word.
PS: I also live in an alternate universe.
website and judge for myself. If my eyes like what I see and Jr. stands up, then I will check out the other details such as donation level, incall offered, calendar availability, etc. Assumption is the provider is in the right city where I can see her.