Require that reviews are clear as to whether BJs and intercourse (either kind) involved a cover, or not.

Most reviews are clear as to whether a cover is used for BJs, and often the acronyms BBBJ and CBJ are used.  In addition, there's a profile option to indicate if the provider does CBJs or BBBJs in general--although often a review will be contrary to the profile.  

But I often see reviews where there's no mention of a cover being used for intercourse, nor does it clearly say the intercourse was bareback.  But frequently, the way the review is written, there's a strong implication that there was no cover.  I saw another one of those yesterday, for a provider I know well and who I'm sure doesn't do BBFS.  But clients who don't know her well won't know that, and many hobbyists (including me) won't see providers who engage in BBFS with clients.  

This kind of thing hurts both providers and hobbyists.  It's something that reviews need to be clear about. Since TER needs to read all review text anyway, it should be easy to add a check for mention of a cover, or mention of bareback.  And if it's not there, send the review back for editing.