Here Here, I too would like to see Admin limit the date of review or give a search option as to dates. I get so tired of seeing stuff that is so irrelevant to today's hobby. Like   lololancer said they are most likely inactive or off the radar.

Just one man's opinion, but it's obvious to me that the designer(s) went out of there way to NOT find out what works for the end user. This new rendition of the site is very much harder to use, and it's implementation is poor. And since we have been using it, I ALWAYS go back to the Classic Site. Sadly, the powers that be don't seem to be listening because they haven't tried to improve the new version. You may think the visuals are better, but the functionality is an  inferior product.

If the honchos are interested in improving their site, couldn't they get someone brilliant to do this?

Come on TER, TRY HARDER!

Jake

Also, a better place to voice your ideas for the new site would be the Suggestion & Policy Board.

disagree. Lack of reviews doesn't signify inactive. Should there be a place to "archive" or label inactive profiles? Definitely. Should it be based on a time limit? No it should be self-reported or reported by various sources.

Since joining TER back in 2004, the new upgrade is the third major update.  IMO, the current upgrade is good, but it has downsides when perusing posts that require too much scrolling.  

I disagree with your opinion that ladies who haven't been reviewed for over a year should have their reviews archived.  Many long time ladies here that are long established, have a client base mostly of regulars, and are still active, should not be dropped.  FYI, many of those ladies pay for VIP access just as we hobbyists do.  Those that do are should never have their reviews removed or archived unless they wish to do so.