I do agree that there really should be a review section or a "comment" section to the reviews. As a former provider, who had provided for over 5 years, I've had some jerks, but many wonderful clients, which some I still keep in contact with via the phone here and there to catch up.

From gossip here and there, there are review sites geared toward the provider, and owned by maybe former providers, but still not that many out there. Those are the sites where you may be able to list your woes.

Hang in there, sis. Think of it this way, before going into a session, no matter what the outcome is, you leave with your self dignity, and a pocket full of change

No hobbyist is obligated to write a favorable review, or to withhold unfavorable comment if that was the experience he had.

My concern is that the review be an accurate description and analysis of what happen during the session.  Hobbyists who tend to be unsatisfiable generally reflect that in their reviwing history, and I'm betting most other hobbyists will be able to determine that if/when they do the research prior to seeing you.  I hope that whatever positive moments occured in the session, the reviewer is mature enough to mention them and try to wigh the balance.  I've had bad experiences, but even the bad ones had good moments, and I've alwyas mentioned them in my reviews.

Some providers are up front and inform you that they do not wish to be reviewed.  There's no way to enforce that, of course, but have you considered stipulating that?

Being beaten, strangled, knocked out and raped is something far more serious than a bad review, obviously.  A bad hobbyist experience does not justify any of that.