Anyone else getting frustrated by the inconsistent unhelpful locations on reviews?
Half the time the location given is the place that the provider got her first review and bears no relation to the place the reviewer met her. Providers who haven't been to a given city in years show up in new reviews for that area...
reviews are coming up as if the provider is in NY when in fact she's in Denver (for example) and the algorithm doesn't seem to be consistent. And furthermore it's not clear in the beta version what the location box means, as evidenced by the variety of ways reviewers are completing it. Crazy making.
You review a lady from NY, and note that you saw her in downtown Indianapolis.
Let's imagine that I'm in Indianapolis too and I was following your reviews because I like your style. Under the old algorithm, it would show that you saw her in Indianapolis. But now against your review it will wrongly show NY as the location of your encounter (useless info) and I miss a cue to see the lady.
A similar thing is true for new reviews. Providers reviewed in Indianapolis who have a different location in their base profile are being missed in the new review list for Indianapolis. But they will be listed in new reviews for their base location -- more useless information because they are not available there!
Or try this. Go to the profile one of the ladies you have reviewed and click on your name to bring up your reviews in list form. Look at the traveling ladies you have seen. If you are in TER classic it will say where you saw them. If you are in TER Beta it will say you saw them in their home cities.