Write Review
2,068,716 Total Reviews 3,817 New Reviews
21,514 Users Online

Suggestion and Policy

??
clarence37 37 Reviews 1669 reads
posted

I don't know... what does color have to do with the size of the woman?

clarence372609 reads

There is frequent complaining that descriptions are not accurate (specifically, a girl described as "baby fat" is actually extra large).

MY complaint is that the descriptive words for anybody with a waist larger than about 28 inches are all very insulting (flabby, heavy, very fat, etc).

Someone recently suggested a picture guide; wouldn't that be awesome?! There must be somewhere on this board that a series of photos, or cartoons could be posted to illustrate 10 different "sizes" of women, without the insulting labels, that would allow the descriptions to be MUCH more accurate.

ReplyQuoteReport
serpius1545 reads

... idea, with one major problem.

Who is going to DECIDE the labels and how the pictures match those labels or vice versa?

If you and I saw the same picture of a 5'5" lady who weighs 150# with a pair of DDs. I may use the label "chunky", whereas you may label her as 'small BBW'. Even though we are looking at the SAME frickin' picture, we still have a problem of HOW to label those kinds of ladies.

If TER does decide to pursue this idea, is ONE person going to be making a decision that the rest of us have to follow? Should TER setup a committee of TER management, hobbyists and providers to come up with a sensible way to label the various body types?

While your idea has merit, the way to label the body types has to be considered carefully.

Serpius

Posted By: clarence37
There is frequent complaining that descriptions are not accurate (specifically, a girl described as "baby fat" is actually extra large).

MY complaint is that the descriptive words for anybody with a waist larger than about 28 inches are all very insulting (flabby, heavy, very fat, etc).

Someone recently suggested a picture guide; wouldn't that be awesome?! There must be somewhere on this board that a series of photos, or cartoons could be posted to illustrate 10 different "sizes" of women, without the insulting labels, that would allow the descriptions to be MUCH more accurate.

ReplyQuoteReport
HoneyDooDoo1220 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
BabydollLarsson1442 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
clarence371670 reads

I don't know... what does color have to do with the size of the woman?

ReplyQuoteReport
HoneyDooDoo959 reads

Posted By: BabydollLarsson


Fat knows no color.  Your caboose is not quite minivan size anyway Ms Larsson. I'd put you at Mini Cooper or VW Beetle size.

ReplyQuoteReport
BabydollLarsson1014 reads

Fat and bone structre doesnt happen diff dependant on race. Not BONE WEIGHT BUT BONE DENSITY, this is why some races are more prone to Osteoporosis, Osteomalacia, and Celiac Disease .Please feel free to look it up. Ms. Larsson will be fine either way, because she hits the pole at least 4 days a week to get a big firm booty.Have a beautiful night sweetie.


-- Modified on 1/17/2013 11:50:12 PM

ReplyQuoteReport
clarence37972 reads

Ms. Baby Doll, I'm sorry but I don't understand what you are talking about, but if I have offended you in any way, I apologize.

My OP was about finding ways to describe a women's size accurately without being insulting - my feeling is that right now, all the descriptive choices for any woman larger than a size 10 or so are insulting. I don't WANT to describe a woman that I have seen, that I liked, who has a thick waist or big thighs and booty as "fat" or "flabby", I want gentler words like "curvy" or "voluptuous". And I thought that if we just had a picture guide of different sizes ranging from real skinny to real heavy, that the description could be spot-on accurate.

So you go ahead and have yourself a beautiful day too.

Posted By: BabydollLarsson
Fat and bone structre doesnt happen diff dependant on race. Not BONE WEIGHT BUT BONE DENSITY, this is why some races are more prone to Osteoporosis, Osteomalacia, and Celiac Disease .Please feel free to look it up. Ms. Larsson will be fine either way, because she hits the pole at least 4 days a week to get a big firm booty.Have a beautiful night sweetie.


-- Modified on 1/17/2013 11:50:12 PM

ReplyQuoteReport
BabydollLarsson927 reads

You didn't offend me everyone else did honey..I dont like the descriptions on TER either.

Posted By: clarence37
Ms. Baby Doll, I'm sorry but I don't understand what you are talking about, but if I have offended you in any way, I apologize.

My OP was about finding ways to describe a women's size accurately without being insulting - my feeling is that right now, all the descriptive choices for any woman larger than a size 10 or so are insulting. I don't WANT to describe a woman that I have seen, that I liked, who has a thick waist or big thighs and booty as "fat" or "flabby", I want gentler words like "curvy" or "voluptuous". And I thought that if we just had a picture guide of different sizes ranging from real skinny to real heavy, that the description could be spot-on accurate.

So you go ahead and have yourself a beautiful day too.
Posted By: BabydollLarsson
Fat and bone structre doesnt happen diff dependant on race. Not BONE WEIGHT BUT BONE DENSITY, this is why some races are more prone to Osteoporosis, Osteomalacia, and Celiac Disease .Please feel free to look it up. Ms. Larsson will be fine either way, because she hits the pole at least 4 days a week to get a big firm booty.Have a beautiful night sweetie.


-- Modified on 1/17/2013 11:50:12 PM

ReplyQuoteReport
BabydollLarsson1627 reads



-- Modified on 1/17/2013 9:23:42 PM

ReplyQuoteReport
London Rayne1076 reads

I do agree with simply going in and updating/adding more options...that should be rather easy depending on how the CMS works for the site. It should be something like 1. Super Thin, 2. Slim, but Athletic, 3. Athletic and Toned, 4. Muscular. 5. A little extra weight, 6. Soft body or flabby, 7. Volumptuous (sp?), 8. 50 extra pounds 8. 100 extra pounds.

While we are at it, might be a good idea to add a vagina category lol. We could have  Innie, Outie, Bubblegum, Can tie a knot with it, and I'm thinking Arby's bwahahahah. Sorry..could not resist.

-- Modified on 1/18/2013 2:32:40 PM

ReplyQuoteReport
fallonkelly1343 reads

I guess it would just make too much sense to have a Yes or No question to be filled in by the reviewer:

Does her appearance match her pics?  Yes or No

But that would be too easy and you wouldn't be able to call people ugly names then.

ReplyQuoteReport
clarence37880 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
perfectstorm966 reads

TER should adopt something like that. Here are the o411 descriptions:
Skinny 
Slender
Athletic
Muscular
Average
Curvy
Voluptuous
Bbw
Super bbw

ReplyQuoteReport
clarence37943 reads

But I still like the picture guide :-)

ReplyQuoteReport
clarence371062 reads

A picture guide would be simple to create. I, or any graphic artist, could create it in no time. And I think everyone is missing the point that with a picture guide, the titles go out the window. You don't have to label the pix with skinny, fat, and flabby, the pictures speak for themselves/ See? So label them 1,2,3,4,etc, refer to picture guide.

You ever notice that men are always bragging about how big their penises are, but you never hear it from women about their vaginas? You hear "I could drill for oil with this thing!" but you never hear "I could park a Buick down there!!"

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!