San Francisco

Difference between SF & LA
GirlCrazy 654 reads
posted

I used to live in SF before I moved to LA.

IMHO, the reasons for no kissing are fear of STD and SO/boyfriend factor.  I have read reviews about a popular LA provider that is a porn amateur who used to provide DFK, BBBJTC and sometimes even Greek.  Now she is living with someone and there is only CBJ, may be a kiss on the lips.

May be because of the preception of the larger gay community in SF than in LA and more STD awareness in the Bay Area, I noticed that most of the SF providers do CBJ while quite a large percentage of LA providers do BBBJ.  It is easier for someone to move from BBBJ to DFK.

There are lots of low cost completition (especially the Russian agencies) in LA than in SF (It is expensive to live in the Bay Area :) ), hence independents are more willing to offer more down here.

(I am going to get flame for this one) IMHO, lots of SF providers have deadbeat boyfriends (in other ways, they are more into love) while a large amount of LA providers are foreigners or would-be actresses that are more career orientated; hence less attachments to SOs.

It's a classic line from some old movie, don't ask me which one, I can only place movie lines from films after 1980.

I've never quite understood why most providers don't kiss, particularly in the SF Bay Area. I've seen a few traveling ladies, only because their reviews said they were great kissers.

I don't like seeing out-of-town girls, because I believe in supporting the local industry and keeping the fine regional talent in business.

But I'm looking for a great provider who likes to kiss. I promise I don't have cooties, or anything else that might be unpleasantly transmittable.

Why don't providers kiss?

I dont know... For me the experience just isnt complete if they dont... The usual excuse is that it's reserves for boyfriends or some such nonsense... Never mind the fact that they just swirrled their tongue all over Mr Johnson... So far I havent had a bay area provider that did, tho I hear Sultry Zoe does - so she's on the short list.

Not to gripe (much...), but this wasnt as big a deal in LA. I had two regular faves that loved to get into deep sloppy french kisses and really make out. So far my experience here has been much more mechanical and distant, generally speaking...

Perhaps this will change as I test new waters...

Riker,

I echo your sentiments.  There is magic in a passionate kiss.  It makes the entire encounter as close to a GFE as you can get.

There are two primary reasons for them not wanting to kiss.

1/  They consider it to be too initimate/emotional.  Hence, you may hear them say that "kissing" is reserved for their boyfriend/husband.

2/  Fear of contracting a disease.   To alleviate any issues on this I am including a weblink to a web site that provides tons of information to dispell off any myths, or misunderstandings.   http://www.avert.org

Like you, I am support our local talent.  However, over the past few months, it is my observation that the local talent pool is slipping...  

1/  Some of the local talent have poor etiquette, and ethics.  
 
2/  Some constantly hustle.  They watch the clock intently, and aggressivley try and upsell.

3/  Lack of truth in advertising.  Rampant playing of the bait and switch card.

4/  The entire experience is TOO mechanical and distant.

5/  Upon receiving several good reviews, a few change their attitude/quality of service (for the worse).

Having said that, I am CONFIDENT that there are DIAMONDS in our neck of the woods.   I will be mining for them ;-).


-- Modified on 7/14/2002 9:42:07 AM

-- Modified on 7/15/2002 7:53:52 AM

Initially, I figured escorts just don't kiss. I always thought the "too personal" excuse was just an excuse, made credible by the film Pretty Woman, which used it as a romantic, character development devise for the story. But, again, as a rule, I thought, providers just don't kiss. Then I started reading these reviews on TER, of ladies from other states and other countries, and realized that it's just here that they don't kiss. I suppose that GFE is a relatively new phenomenon which simply hasn't caught-on here in SF.

GirlCrazy655 reads

I used to live in SF before I moved to LA.

IMHO, the reasons for no kissing are fear of STD and SO/boyfriend factor.  I have read reviews about a popular LA provider that is a porn amateur who used to provide DFK, BBBJTC and sometimes even Greek.  Now she is living with someone and there is only CBJ, may be a kiss on the lips.

May be because of the preception of the larger gay community in SF than in LA and more STD awareness in the Bay Area, I noticed that most of the SF providers do CBJ while quite a large percentage of LA providers do BBBJ.  It is easier for someone to move from BBBJ to DFK.

There are lots of low cost completition (especially the Russian agencies) in LA than in SF (It is expensive to live in the Bay Area :) ), hence independents are more willing to offer more down here.

(I am going to get flame for this one) IMHO, lots of SF providers have deadbeat boyfriends (in other ways, they are more into love) while a large amount of LA providers are foreigners or would-be actresses that are more career orientated; hence less attachments to SOs.

sweetsable1166 reads

I'm from Las Vegas (I used to participate on the TER National Board all the time, some of you may know me) where DFk is almost standard.

I now serve Northern CA (Dont go quite as far as San Francisco). I think the ladies here have had bad experiences..."managers and boyfriends", in addition to clients who arent bfe's. I think the ladies get cynical and jaded because of this. It is sad to me.

Keep looking gentlemen, check their reviews and back channel...I'm sure you'll find what you are looking for. :0)

Sable
xoxo

Register Now!