In reviews. Quantify it, 30% of reviews are fake, ok.
That said, a lady had consistent looks and performance numbers gets 1 or 2 dings. Just a sour apple, no problem.
What is totally wierd is when a lady looks and performance numbers are all over the page.....wtf?
Either its 2 different providers using the same number or jekle and hyde...
that gets consistently high scores from a relatively small group of reviewers. Any time a reviewer who has broader tastes posts a review of this tribe, scores tend be be lower with comments like fake pic or gained weight or not really GFE.
It's an easily corrupted system. Maybe the next version of TER due out in 2025 will be better.
Could be more than one girl, an agency or simply a reflection of the varying perceptions and opinions. We are of all different ages, sizes, desires and tastes on both sides of this dichotomy.
There is some truth in advertising though. I recall seeing a provider 5 or years ago that was consistently getting 7's, 8's and on occasion 9's on appearance. No way. She was claiming to be in her late 30's but she was more likely in her mid to late 50's. looked it and I may be being generous.
If she was really posting her actual age and looked the way she did, I can't see how she was getting those numbers. She was, as I rated her a 5 and I was being generous. We did have a good time she just didn't look the part. To her high ratings, perhaps her clientele was as mature as she and saw her as a 7 or 8 for who she was.
So it's all over the place.
My problem with the grading system is the standard some guys use as their "10." For me, a "10" is a Victoria's Secret model who is totally happy to see me. That means thin/fit, beautiful face, smooth skin, non-smoker, long hair, no tattoos, etc. Admittedly, it's a high bar to cross, and I'm not sure I've ever given a 10. An 8 on my scale is an incredibly pretty provider.
Some guys throw a 9 or 10 around to gals I might describe as thick, GND types. Perhaps they are so excited to get some that they just can't see straight. I understand different strokes for different folks, but shouldn't we leave some room at the top for objectively gorgeous women?
Same experience here..
50 yr old providers listing as late 30s and also getting 8 or 9 in looks department per rating . ..
Gotta take ratings with a grain of salt.. I have been burnt many times