Did anyone happen to catch this shit? I believe it was the Chicago branch of BLM that tweeted a meme in support of Hamas. That alone is like, whatever, it’s not like that’s unexpected. But the weird thing is the meme had a cartoony picture of a Hamas fighter (or terrorist might be the more correct word) on a glider or parachute or something. I didn’t really understand the connection until I heard about a Hamas attack where they dropped into Israel and murdered a bunch of people at a night club. So it isn’t that BLM is saying we’re on Team Palestinians instead of Team Israel. It’s we’re on Team Murder Innocent People In Night Clubs. The fuck.

Here's the thing, BLM is NOT a monolithic group. So if one of them puts out a stupid meme that doesn't mean all of them (or even most of them) agree with it. Nobody knows. Don't be like Piñata-Boy and pretend you do.
Piñata-Boy = One Stupid Mother Fucker.

Sick people.

The organization as a whole is wildly in disarray after its leadership ran off with all the money my. Now philosophically their charter would side with someone like Hamas. The stunt pulled in Chicago has angered some of their members however not enough to announce a retraction writ large. My suspicion is they are simply looking for a new grift to scam whatever money they can out of the event.  

For those that want to take up for BLM? Don’t, they have no interest in advancing race relations. They like many other race hucksters have capitalized on the death of George Floyd, a man they themselves wouldn’t have had a single thing to do with if they met him on the street.  

What this really has done is brought to the fore the stunning amount of antisemitism in this country.

The left has been going on and on about white supremacy that isn’t really there, but antisemitism? Holy FUCK it’s there in spades!!!

I know it triggers icky badly when Willy says they burned down half the country Because he’s looking for something to be argumentative about, but what they did was destroy many Many Many public buildings and businesses and kill a large number of people and injure many more, with their mostly peaceful protests, all to secure donations. Which their leadership then stole and went and bought large mansions.

All aided by the left wing liberal media 🙄🙄🙄

I own him and the snowflake doesn't even know it. It's so much fun to use him as my piñata and puppet.

The attached article seems to be a straightforward analysis of all BLM-related organizations. What it seems to show is that there are many of them, with lots of confusing inter-relationships. It is very likely that all this is a format for at least SOME grifting. But the bottom line is, BLM is not a single, cohesive thing and you can't simply condemn it as if it was. In all likelihood, some BLM-titled  groups are grifters and some are not.
But it's impossible to tell from the article below, which are and which are not.

I’m not too fond of the notion of guilt by association. Perhaps one BLM chapter may have good intentions while another has bad intentions. Maybe the intentions of the leadership is different from the intentions of the rank and file members. Maybe even membership is too strong a word when it’s just people who support what they think BLM stands for.  

 
But in all honesty I gotta say your position appears to be sophistry.  

 
So let’s try a thought experiment. People on the left today pretty universally condemn the Ku Klux Klan. The SPLC identified some 160 different chapters of the KKK IN 41 different states. Are they all bad? Should we universally condemn all of them?

The KKK's reason for being is to attack and intimidate Blacks, Jews and Catholics. BLM's reason for being is to protest police violence against Blacks. In some cases it may be to grift.  
Does Willy see the difference?

One could say that BLM’s purpose is act as a Democrat controlled domestic terror group. But this is a subjective viewpoint, not an objective one. The purpose for these groups by you Nicky is equally subjective.  

 
Not it’s not like I have anything nice to say about the KKK, but if you were to ask the members if the KKK themselves, what do you think they’d say the purpose of the group is? Would they say “Attack and intimidate Blacks, Jews and Catholics” or would they give another reason?  

 
The point is that any group is going to try to pit themselves in the best light possible. Hamas might say, “we don’t want to kill Jews, we just want to free the people of Palestine.” Someone from the KKK might say, “we don’t want to lynch black people, we just want to protect our own culture”. And someone from BLM might say, “we don’t want to engage in a coast to coast domestic terror campaign, we just want to stop police brutality against black people.”  

 
Rhetoric is often effective, but you can know a group or organization by their actions. What they do and what they don’t do.

You don't "have anything nice to say about the KKK" but do you accept whatever they might say to cover their racist agenda?
And who says "BLM's purpose is [to] act as a Democrat controlled domestic terror group?" Willy? Does Willy believe this is true, despite the utter lack of evidence that is true?

My point is *not* to paint the KKK in the best light possible. But members of the KKK certainly would. That’s my point.

 
It’s not like BLM’s tactics haven’t been used before. The same thing happen during the Russian revolution that brought the communists to power. The Reds had a militant wing that used violence directly against the Russian people so the communists could gain power. They were the original Antifa. BLM even espouses communist ideas like the redistribution of wealthy and property and the abolition of the family. Burning down businesses, attacking law enforcement all exactly the same tactics used to created the Soviet Union.

 
It is not a stretch to call BLM a domestic terror group. Title 18 § 2331 of the US Code defines domestic terrorism as activities that:

“(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;
(B) appear to be intended—
(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping;”

 
BLM is the textbook definition of a domestic terror group. Dare I say much more so than the KKK judging by the events of the current century.

I’m no KKK historian, but as far as I know they haven’t lynched anyone in the last 60 years. And despite that I’ve spent plenty of time in the south I’ve never seen anyone in a Klan robe. Not a Klan rally, not a single burning cross, nothing. But I’ve seen the charred remains of buildings set on fire by BLM. I don’t see governments legalizing lynching, but I do see them defunding the police. I see Biden’s justice department say the biggest threat to the USA is white supremacy while those BLM rioters who burned down countless businesses, police precincts and courthouses still walk free.

I never said your point was to "paint the KK in the best light possible." You have completely misunderstood what I wrote, so please go back and try again.
As for BLM, Willy is the one missing the point. As I've said in the past, BLM is an amorphous group that has lots of different views within it. BLM itself doesn't even really espouse an ideology. Willy's description of them is really a better description of Antifa.
Also, Willy needs to bone up on the Russian Revolution. His descriptions of it are simply wrong.
As for the KKK, we are having a pointless discussion. The KKK barely exists. Instead we have the Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers and those clowns who marched carrying tiki torches in Charlottesville.

the "Conan" brand and all of a sudden, everyone else is comprehension-challenged.  (You did know that a hyphen was in order, right? - Lol)

It is very sad to see a complete absence of game, a severe intellectual deficit and the emotional depth of a rutabaga combine on one completely inadequate pile of shit.
Roll Over, Piinata-Boy!