Politics and Religion

This is the craziest wacko thing yet!
Mr.M.Johnson 4342 reads
posted

I'm hoping that there are psychiatrists or psychologists here that can help us understand this LOLROF "Love-Fest!"  Illigitimate POTUS obviously staged this ass-kissing contest.  He ordered his Cabinet to a meeting and proclaimed "it's time for an ass-kissing contest - I wanna see who is the best ass-kisser amongst all of you.  I'll drop my shorts and EVERRYONE kiss my ass and I'll decide who does it best!"

This fucking deranged narcissistic POTUS clearly has major mental problems.  He needs constant love and attention.

I'm hoping that any/all TER Politics Board resident psychiatrists/psychologists can help us understand Trump's psychosis

This is absolutely bizarre.  My two faves are Priebus - "blessed" and Mattis, who didn't kiss-ass - note Trump's disappointment

http://www.nytimes.com/video/us/politics/100000005160406/trump-cabinet-meeting-praise.html?smprod=nytcore-ipad&smid=nytcore-ipad-share

went under the chair and made sure he got the Emperor's full fucking ass to kiss.    He did not see any papers inside that ass that said he can drill in Russia!

a regular fucking fawn fest...

You and the media are just dumbfounded and beside yourselves that anyone would be proud to serve Trump.  It’s terribly sad you’re so easily manipulated by a highly edited excerpt of the public portion of the very first cabinet meeting when all members are finally present. This meeting was a big deal from the standpoint that it took place almost 2 months later than Obama’s first full meeting due to the Senate Democrats joining the “resist” movement.  

Since the NYT did not for some reason want you to see Mattis’ ass kissing I marked the spot for you in this uncut Youtube presentation. If you back up the video just a bit from there you’ll be able to see the complete reports many made that went well beyond just the ass kissing that you were pre-programmed to witness.

Shall we get into the fact that Obama’s ass was already rubbed raw from all the ass kissing he received by everyone from the media to all the programmed school children? Mmm! Mmm! Mmm!

"This meeting was a big deal from the standpoint that it took place almost 2 months later than Obama’s first full meeting due to the Senate Democrats joining the “resist” movement."

"Just two of Trump’s Cabinet chiefs were approved on Inauguration Day, fewer than his three most recent predecessors. The process has been mired in procedural delays forced by Democrats in committee and problems in processing vetting paperwork. The White House also played a role in the delays, waiting to submit now-Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue’s nomination in March."

And, I can't think of another group of cabinet members with more conflicts of interests! ;)

You seem particularly bitter in your response! ;)

But to your only salient point. . .  Perdue was not even the last cabinet level person confirmed. That dishonor belongs to Robert Lighthizer. Perdue was not even 2nd to last as his confirmation preceded Alex Acosta.

Perdue was the 2nd to last to be announced and nominated but could have been confirmed almost THREE weeks sooner except the Democrats used scheduling procedures to delay the vote. An earlier Perdue vote would have needed a bipartisan effort or unanimous voice vote to proceed to a confirmation vote but the Democrats delayed it in part because they were busy with the filibuster of Gorsuch. Odd considering that when they finally did get around to voting he passed 87 to 13.

We could discuss if you like how the bureaucratic FBI and other Congressional security investigations add to the time between initial announcement and official nomination but I somehow think you don’t really care.  

And to your stupid point. . . Except for the DOJ and certain conditions created by statutes (like the exemptions needed for Mattis and Lighthizer) it’s impossible for a cabinet secretary to have a conflict of Trump’s interest. Only Trump’s interests are those that matter. Yours or anyone else’s do not.

First; "Fake News" was coined by our fake, illegitimate president! ;)

Second; "it’s impossible for a cabinet secretary to have a conflict of Trump’s interest."  

You had to pull that out of your ass,  because I've never heard of such a thing. The conflict of interest would be if a cabinet member was in charge of department where the decisions, s/he made could benefit him/her monetarily, or in other means! Nothing about whether s/he does something against Trump's monetary interests! ;)

Third; "Only Trump’s interests are those that matter. Yours or anyone else’s do not."

Whew! I guess that settles it! Trump truly is not my president! Sounds like you very much favor autocrats as presidents! You'll love Trump then! ;)

Since, it's quite obvious you've gone off the deep end, how about taking the weekend off to gather yourself! ;)

-- Modified on 6/16/2017 5:00:02 PM

...every one of those ass kissing turds is hell bent on destroying the agencies they have been put in charge of, last week was suppose to be "infrastructure week" & most people think infrastructure as roads & bridges, but true infrastructure in our country effects nearly every aspect of our lives. Our airports, our railroad lines, every aspect of our communications, like our postal system ,the food chain, FDA & education, I know there are many more but we are witnessing the destruction of America from the inside & this is how Putin & other enemies of our prosperity want to bring America down. Somehow we must not let that happen, our governmental agencies were put in place to strengthen this country & if this bunch of turds are allowed to destroy them it will take years to put them back in place.

Like Democrats believe health care to be, health care is infrastructure, and nobody has a right to infrastructure, unless you own it.  

Stop spending money on sick people who will eventually die anyway, and spend it on the things society needs.

Yeah Putin, is an issue.

...you are about 180 degrees off, all citizens have an equal right to the infrastructure that our elected officials choose to provide, the only restriction is the V.A. is for qualified military personal only. The big story is who's in charge, people who actually want a system that works well for citizens or one that works so badly that they are forced to use the private sector services, that appears to be a goal of the present administration, otherwise why would so many incompetent  & inexperienced partisan hacks be inducted into cabinet positions?

Try setting up a tent on Amtrack  property, or squatting in one of their coaches.  

 
You will be removed for trespassing.

...I don't know how can come up with these posts each one more foolish than the last, you must have taken the tweeting course at Trump university.

The federal government has become too bloated and too powerful. So much so it feels entitled to create regulations that dramatically stifle commerce  and interfere in people's personal freedom and private property rights while very often producing very little good. In far too many cases, the stated reasoning  for the regulations is without merit or the good that is achieved is so small it is impossible to for a rational observer to justify that action.

 
One of the other main obstacles to reform are government union contracts and civil servant regulations that make it nearly impossible to terminate employees. In reality Congress, over many decades, is ultimately responsible for the dire situation but many over reaches in regulation can be corrected with reducing regulations. The age old federal solution of throwing more money at a problem to solve it hardly ever works and needs to come to an end. The new money creates a new agency and new set of regulations except the existing and competing agency or regulations rarely goes away.

 

Have you ever examined a listing of all the exiting agencies, departments, offices, bureaus, commissions, boards, authorities, committees, divisions, stations? This link is far from complete.

-- Modified on 6/17/2017 3:56:30 PM

Perhaps one has to drill down past his gerontological degenerative mental disease to the possible mood or personality disorder he demonstrated from childhood. But, the bottom line is, is he fit to be president? ;)

Mr.M.Johnson99 reads

How much time did you spend dissecting the video?!

Wanna bet Ed, that Illigitimate POTUS will be in office on 1/12019? - I say he won't

Wanna bet, or, are you all fucking taklk and no balls?

Posted By: Mr.M.Johnson
Re: Ed, you obviously have way too much fucking time on your hands
How much time did you spend dissecting the video?!  
   
 Wanna bet Ed, that Illigitimate POTUS will be in office on 1/12019? - I say he won't  
   
 Wanna bet, or, are you all fucking taklk and no balls?
President Trump will be our  President on 1/12/2019 and beyond unless he has unforeseen physical health issues.  
   
   Is $ 500.00 worth your time or  perhaps you would prefer to lose  more.  
   Loser pays gambler, gambler pays winner, minus 20% handling fee, if that's OK with gambler.  

   On top of the loser paying $500.00, loser must refrain from posting on TER P&R for 500 days.
   Posting with new alias after losing  bet is a penalty of an additional $ 500.00

   You won't be able to  hide your identity with a new alias after losing.  
 I know numerous Russian hackers  who could easily gain access to your TER account.    

I have enough time, intelligence and yes - desire and patriotism to make the effort to know when the Press is trying to bullshit me. Let's talk intelligence first. You can't recognize the video I posted was 22 minutes and 49 seconds long? First hint, that’s how long it would take to watch the whole fucking thing. You lose more intelligence points for not realizing that your video was HIGHLY edited. Or maybe you knew that but didn’t care. It's OK when the Press dissects your videos for you, so you don't have to think about reality? Are you telling me that thinking for yourself takes too much time? If you like, I’ll give you those points back and deduct them from your desire, and patriotism columns. Your willingness and gullibility to gobble up every fake news story that fits your prejudice is all too sad.
   

The Press is the ONLY commercial enterprise that is specifically protected in our Constitution. The founders expected in return for the press to be reasonably honest. If the majority of the press continues to trade in mostly propaganda regarding the political spectrum we can expect that one day the First Amendment will be modified and most likely taken over by the government. The fact that you and others either don’t care or can’t see this is inexplicably sad.
   

My balls and Trump’s future have ZERO to do with why I take the time and effort to engage you. If things continue on their present course it would not surprise me at all for Trump to be gone long before your predicted date. After all the posts and PMs you and I have exchanged and you STILL don’t know that Trump is not and was never “my guy”? But once again, it only proves you don’t care or can’t understand. Tell me, point deduction from the intelligence or desire column?

-- Modified on 6/16/2017 6:07:44 PM

...While I respect all the positive qualities you believe that you apply, in most of your posts I find them to be misapplied, of course the conventional news sources edit tape in order to make their point however honest or dishonest you judge them to be, but in the case of Trumps cabinet meeting the blatant phony fawning praise even in the full unedited tape is unmistakable. Trump & this group of hatchet handed creeps have the goal of cutting these agencies apart & splitting them into bite size pieces so that there work may be digested by private for profit industry. Certainly some of these agencies have operational problems but in most cases the people Trump picked for cabinet positions are woefully unqualified to fix them & that is why it took such an  effort to get them through congressional approval.

Or at the very least begin at about the 12 minute mark where the round table starts? Why not show that? Of course you know why. This is more than "editing to make their point".  The entire round table lasted about 10 minutes so the "non-fawning" far exceeded the "fawning". The fawning is taken so out of context, the casual observer easily comes away with the impression that the entire cabinet meeting was nothing BUT fawning (case in point, the OP).  And the NYT did a very good job with this bit of propaganda. Why did they totally edit out ALL of DOD Sec. Mattis? Answer: He didn't "fawn". THAT bit of editing COMPLETELY FOOLED the OP, MacJohnson.  

I'm not trying to win you or anyone here over to my "application of positive qualities". I know we'll always disagree. All I'm trying to do is fight back against the massively huge increase in mainstream propaganda. If you think the propaganda including false government leaks has not caused damage and is not causing damage to our Republic, then you're not as smart as I've given you credit for. It should at least give you pause.

 But I think what we HAVE proved here is that your intellect does indeed exceed that of MacJohnson.

Register Now!