Politics and Religion

Defending Arizona Its statute will withstand the inevitable KRIS W. KOBACH
Timbow 1720 reads
posted

This is a well written argument by Mr. Kobach was one of the principal drafters of Arizona S.B. 1070. He is professor of law at the University of Missouri (Kansas City) and senior counsel at the Immigration Reform Law Institute .

http://www.ruthfullyyours.com/2010/05/28/defending-arizona-false-charges-with-no-merit/

Hispanic GOP Group to Announce Support for Arizona Immigration Law
By Joshua Rhett Miller

Published July 21, 2010
| FoxNews.com

 Print   Email   Share   Comments (451)   Text Size  

AP

Apr. 23: Standing in front of law enforcement officers, Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer talks about signing the immigration bill in Phoenix.

The Arizona Latino Republican Association will become the first Hispanic organization in the country to actively oppose the Department of Justice's lawsuit against the state of Arizona's new immigration law.

Larry Klayman, founder of Freedom Watch, Inc., said he will be joined by ALRA Chairman Jesse Hernandez and members of the Phoenix Law Enforcement Association at an announcement Thursday morning in Phoenix.

ALRA will become the first group of Latino Americans to "put a foot forward legally" in support of S.B. 1070 by filing a motion to intervene against the Justice Department's lawsuit challenging Arizona's immigration policy, Klayman said.

"This is a way to tell the country that, 'Hey, we're Americans too and we believe in the rule of law," Klayman told Foxnews.com. "It's a way to say, 'We got here legally and we contributed a great deal. We want the rest of the country to recognize that we're with you' [in the national immigration debate]."

By filing the motion, Klayman said ALRA will be "in effect, a defendant" in the DOJ lawsuit, which names the state of Arizona as well as Gov. Jan Brewer as defendants. The Justice Department claims the federal government has "preeminent authority" on immigration enforcement and that the Arizona law "disrupts" that balance.

The motion was filed Wednesday, Klayman said.

Attempts to reach Hernandez were not successful. A message seeking comment from the Department of Justice was not immediately returned.

Arizona's law, which was passed in April, requires police officers conducting traffic stops or questioning suspects about legal violations to ask about immigration status if "reasonable suspicion" exists that the individuals is in the country illegally.  Critics have said the law will lead to racial profiling.

Meanwhile, seven Latin American countries -- Bolivia, Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Paraguay and Peru -- are seeking to join Mexico in support of a lawsuit challenging Arizona's law. The countries have filed separate motions to join Mexico's legal brief supporting the lawsuit filed by U.S. civil rights and other advocacy groups. A federal judge formally accepted Mexico's filing, but did not immediately rule on the latest motions filed late last week.

Rep. Steve Montenegro, R-Ariz., the youngest member of the state's legislature, was the only Hispanic to vote in support of Arizona's new law. As the son of immigrants who came to the U.S. legally, Montenegro became a citizen at age 18 and has repeatedly voiced his support of S.B. 1070.

"America is a not a race," Montenegro told Fox News. "The United States of America is not the color of your skin, it is the way you think, the way you see life."

On officially becoming a U.S. citizen, Montenegro said, "When you finally reach that day, you understand that being an American is a responsibility, not just an entitlement."

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

reason to conclude it is a bad law.

      Klayman is famous for suing his own mother and may have filed more frivolus lawsuits than any lawyer who ever lived.

Timbow1721 reads

This is a well written argument by Mr. Kobach was one of the principal drafters of Arizona S.B. 1070. He is professor of law at the University of Missouri (Kansas City) and senior counsel at the Immigration Reform Law Institute .

http://www.ruthfullyyours.com/2010/05/28/defending-arizona-false-charges-with-no-merit/

declared unconstitutional, wouldn't you expect him to support the law?

     By the way, he also said the law was fine before they amended it to take out the "lawful contact" clause and substitute the current text which requires a legitimate stop. And, as I've pointed out before, he still does not comprehend that one huge difference between his law and the federal law and regs and the length of time a suspect may be detained while his immigration status is being investigated.

Timbow1050 reads

I think the idiot Holder will look like more a dufus  when it is found constitutional and a slew of states will follow with their own similar immigration laws.

-- Modified on 7/21/2010 8:15:52 PM

I sure hope those Slate hicks aren't getting paid for their thoughts. So many words so little substance.

http://www.search.com/reference/Larry_Klayman

Hitchens and Klayman together

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jinJHIkd5r4&feature=player_embedded#!

http://www.nndb.com/people/781/000118427/

Some dirt details..
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg57235.html

On and Off the subject..Check out the coffee case
{not a Klayman case}

http://overlawyered.com/tag/larry-klayman/

Register Now!