I tried posting this question in the general disscussion board some time back but it never got posted for some reason.
My question...
I frequently see reviews that say she would have received a 10 in performance if greek were offered. In the review guidlines it never specifically states that greek needs to be offered for a 10 rating. It simply says;
An escort provider may only eligible to earn up to a 7, unless she also willing to performs the following during a session: Kisses With Tongue, Bare-Back Blow Job, Really Bi, Anal Sex, or More than One Guy. The addition of each offering will raise the score she is eligible for by one point.
This does not mean she earns extra points for performing the service; just that she is now eligible for a higher score. Her maximum eligible score is based on what is offered, not what is taken. You may or may not be interested in the “extra” services she has, but the fact she offers them makes her eligible for the higher score.
Now since there are five possible points above a 7 she can gain from the guidline alone, it seems to me that a 10 performance is easily attainable without the offering of greek.
Am I wrong here? It seems that a vast majority of reviews I've read lead me to believe that many feel the opposite of the way I feel.
I really have no interest in greek therfore it never plays into the way I rate my reviews.
I have rated a couple of providers with a 10 in performance and they were approved. So I think TER agrees with me on this but again many seem to be missinformed.
What is the oppinion of everyone else here?
There are other ways to get a ten without anal.
I also think that how one does anything is more important than what they do or don't do.
I've never agreed that 10 should be predicated on anal being offered.
I had a 8/9 in DC one time. He had told me I was the most sexual woman ever, ....blah, blah, blah and when I asked him after the review posted why I didn't get the 10 he said, "because you didn't SAY to me that you wanted to do Greek."
This is subjective at best. All any of us can do is our best and with your help, ONCE you are verified tell us what you want. We are not mind readers.
And remember, Greek should be prepared for. If we don't know you want it, it could be embarrassing if it happens. I love spontaneity as much as the next but this is ONE service that should be planned for...........just in case.
Sincerely,
Anneke
This is very interesting to me as well...
A very good friend of mine was reviewed and the gent gave her a 10 for performance but it was knocked down to a 9 because she doesnt do the "extras" although she has several other 10's where she didnt do any "extras" either.
A persons experience should not be governed. Do we not live in a free country with free expression??
How does someone decide that she should only get a 9 when the gent says it was a 10- once in alifetime experience for him???????
Wrong... just plain wrong
~Alena
without offering anal. However, In reading reviews for over 6 years, more reviews mention anal than bi or doing more than one guy at a time. Just my observation.
on what numbers they could give us ladies..I am very happy with my reviews as such and I like to pick and choose what I do with who.
Are you saying if you have those extra services checked in your profile then you can get a 10 either way, even if that service is not at that time.
I have noticed providers who get 10's even though they didn't do any extra service during that session. I know a few gentlemen have said they wanted to give me a 10 but thought they couldn't.
Kisses Haley
offered, not performed for the review to qualify for a 10 score. There are differing opinions on how that is enforced. Some have opined that the profile itself (which is based on the first review) has to have the service checked off to qualify, but my experience (in the reverse) is that when the review is written, the reviewer has to indicate the service is offered on his review submitting form for the score to be accepted, even though that form will never see the light of day.
I had mistakenly clicked the wrong field in a review that I had written indicating that the lady did not kiss with tongue. Because of that, the performance score was adjusted down by a point. I inquired thinking that, since she allowed CIM, she was allowed a 9, but was told that CIM was not a point increasing factor. I then argued to the death through five exchanges that her profile had the requisite point increasing qualifiers only to be told that the review the I had submitted did not because of MY mistake. I admitted to being an idiot, apologized for being so forceful in my idiocy and requested that I be allowed to change the fields because the narrative specifically detailed DFK. They must have accepted my apology because they graciously changed the field and the score back to what I had submitted.
Good luck
of the reviewer. I have understood the reviews that I have read that are similar to what you describe to mean that the reviewer himself would have given a 10 if she offered Greek, NOT that he was prevented from doing so by the guidelines.
To each his own, and if a reviewer would not consider a session a 10 without a specific service, then he has that right since it is supposed to be either "Once in a lifetime" or "One in a million" depending on which TER page you read.
Good luck