I was trying to re-write some of my reviews with a lot more detail in them. I also know that the girl will be reading the review too. I'm not sure how explicit I should be. I keep debating it in my mind and it is a road block in my writings.
Should I stay classy with it, or go more the raunchy detailed side of things?
I prefer my reviews to be classy and not too raunchy , give other hobbyist a taste but spare some details!
The hobbyists reading the review wants to know what kinds of activity are allowed and which are not.
So, it would be a service to say that she offers BBBJ and not just mention that she does oral.
On the other hand, there's no reason to indicate how your cum splattered all over her face because you came like a cannon.
We're not writing porn here exactly.
...but seriously, mrfisher is right. You can give a comprehensive idea of what a girl does, and how well she does it, without sounding crass or completely vulgar.
I like to say what services were offered and something about the attitude of the provider.As far as graphic details go , it depends on how I feel about the session at the time that I write the review.
A TER review is the quintessential kiss & tell locker-room brag fest. What would shock the ordinary civvi woman in regards to graphic detail is exactly what will get the review "approved".
However; the details should only be about the torrid co-mingling of human flesh and bodily fluids, NOT the exterior color of her home, its geographic relationship to a regional land mark, or the breed of her dog/cat etc. Details like these will only invade her privacy and threaten her anonymity.