This is a new policy for TER. This sucks. I want to know about MPs. Not all are the same. VIP credit should count.
That's been the policy since before I joined a few years ago.
Never really cared that much. Considering how much I spend on the women, a few bucks a month for membership doesn't mean a thing.
non credit for MP's has been in effect since day one, although occasionally, a review slips through for credit and does note get categorized as an MP.
I agree, you should get credit for those reviews, especially when it is a full service offering.
and I'm not even talking about their relative inexpensiveness. Some of them are a real treasure.
MPs have never counted. On the other hand, AMPs do if the provider is FS.
Massage parlor reviews (Asian or otherwise) do not count for VIP credit, regardless of services rendered. However, if the massage parlor advertises on the internet, you might get VIP credit, if the approver is unaware that the review is of a massage parlor. Contrary to GS's claim, this is not a new TER policy.
If you are aware of massage parlor reviews where VIP credit was granted, it was in error. To return the unearned VIP credits, simply email Staff at [email protected].
Below is an excerpt from the policy statement:
"Massage Parlor reviews are accepted and posted in the Massage Parlor section, due to their popularity with our members. However, these reviews will not receive membership credit because the majority of Massage Parlors don’t advertise on the web (internet advertising is a TER must for posting)."
At least in NYC, there are many 'massage' places on the internet which provide outcall as well. Perhaps in this city of sin, anything goes and AMPs simply cross the line. I assure you that many reviews in the NYC area are accepted for VIP credit as we all know that for the money, you can get a 3 hour massage instead of a 1 hour full service.
I got full credit for an AMP review last August.
For as long as I have been here (4 years) that rule has been in effect.
If some nice moderator gave you VIP credit for a MP review, that was kind of them, but is not the norm.