Funny! Another encounter of the "stinky kind". LOL Notice the reviewer "refuses seconds"!!!
-- Modified on 11/1/2005 10:18:16 AM
6 times longer (and much more explicit) that got "unapproved". The reviewer is obviously a simpleton. There clearly is an "uneven hand" when it comes to review approvals. This review is pathetic.
-- Modified on 11/1/2005 8:25:28 AM
I wouldn't be surprised if Staff agreed with you.
thirsty
the reviewer say's he'd repeat. Another "genius" reviewer. (LOL, he complains he's not offered a "towel").
-- Modified on 11/1/2005 9:43:15 AM
-- Modified on 11/1/2005 9:45:14 AM
I posted this review of another provider last week and it was rejected for not being explicited enough. The review read:
"took my coat and start with a nice deep massage which lead to most of my clothes coming off. Then on to some UTF both way and pops 1 & 2, BBBJ, DATY, Mish. I love the way she slow wrrpped her tongue around my cock and made me aware that she truely loved socking it. HJ. What a great lady!!!!! Things were sort of a blurr after that but I left with my head spinning. "
IMHO the review of Hunter was mild compared to mine and got approved. After I complained I got my review approved but there really seems to be a double standard here. Perhaps the old saying "Its not who you know, but who you bl*w" that counts. My .02
Funny! Another encounter of the "stinky kind". LOL Notice the reviewer "refuses seconds"!!!
-- Modified on 11/1/2005 10:18:16 AM
The guy's cock is aching from her orthodonture! LOL Notice the comment from hobbyist, "I went raw and scratch" (from the braces).
-- Modified on 11/1/2005 10:39:43 AM
-- Modified on 11/1/2005 10:43:53 AM