Hello everyone. I recieved a review by a "king" something or other and its a total lie. When I brought this to the attention of ter they said its his word against yours. All you have to do is gp through the 3 pages of reviews where i have recieved excellent reviews to see that he is waaaaay off base. He said i looked pregnant everyone else says i'm slim, he said my pictures were old.  My pictures were taken on valentines day this year. It really sucks that providers dont have a forum to dispute when someone usually someone with ulterior ,motives makes a bogus post. I'll be very surprised if this even makes it up on this board but i figured i'd give it a try. TER it's not fair that these girls cant respond to these reviews even in a different section as to not ruin the review process, i mean the guys use fake names so its not like we know who they are. I'm certain many other girls have had this problem and have had no where to vent the discrepency, hopefully ter will allow this post so this issue can be discussed.
ThANK you for your time,
Samanthasummers
p.s. this is by no means to trash ter they do a great job and bring me in lots of business. This is how i pay my rent and some liar who lied about everything (most people dont even know i smoke cause i only do it if the client does, he said i was smoking when he got there .  more bs) enough already i think i got my point accross. If ter posts this i think they will see that i am not the only one who is  having competition post bad reviews, or when a girl is touring the same time as you they get one of their "boys" with many reviews previously posted to do it so it looks legit. No lie looks legit to the person its about, it may however look legit to someone sho doesnt know better. I just hope everyone takes into account that i have 3 pages of better than average if not 9's and 10's posted and not the one bad one which is a total lie.

Sam, take it from me. Don't even sweat the small stuff. Most of the guys here are smart enough to know a phony or biased review when they read it. Especially if you have a number of positive ones.  

don't worry about that. When there's one bad review and 25 good ones, it's either YMMV or bogus. Either way it's not a problem.

By the way I think it was a "snake" and not a "king" something that wrote the bad review.

Take care

Sure look good to me!

Speaking just for me, if a provider has a string of good reviews and one bad, I take the bad with a grain of salt...just like if a provider has had a # of bad reviews and suddenly gets a good review...I discount the good review.   In the end, it's the trend.

-Hoot.

thanks all who responded. I take a great deal of pride in my sessions then to see some one back me, well it not only hurt but it suck! thanks for the advice. Dont forget to see me in nj ill be the this mon-thurs

Actually, I'm more comfortable w/ a few bad reviews interspersed with many good ones. Seems more realistic. Consider: even the greatest movies get some bad reviews. Seems that it may pay to follow a reviewer who seems to have tastes that reflect your own.

I agree with Hoot, one bad review vs a number of favorable reviews= YMMV or the gentleman has some problem with that provider. However, at the end of the day-- you providers are just a bunch of whores & none of us really care what you think. So keep your legs spread & your worthless opinions to yourselves. CC

CC, I cracked up when I read your comment.  You're my guy!

Cynic, Perhaps we should switch handles? Party on ! CC

You're kidding, right?  Ya know these sort of comments discourage the ladies from participating on TER.  

-Hoot.

No, he's not kidding. I made this point a few weeks ago when someone wondered why the ladies didn't participate in discussions more often. A lot of hobbyist think this way, you'd be surprised. At least cofeecan has the balls to admit it.

But really, who is in the position to judge ones worth? A lady of questionable commerce or the man who pays for her services?

Neither.

recorded history. This says much for its need in society! I, for one, am extremely glad that it's available and provided by so many luscious beauties! Thank you.

Lighten up.  It was an obvious joke, and I, for one, thought it was perfectly positioned.    CC said that purposely just to piss off some people and get a rise out of them, and indeed it certainly worked with you two.

Actually Hoot, I prefer providers not participate on TER. I believe TER should provide the edge for my fellow hobbyists, myself & even yourself. I am of the opinion the majority of providers rarely change based on their reviews. Meaning-- if they're into it, great. If they're not into it ----(providing the type of service I want to receive)-- They will never be into it and bad reviews aren't going to inspire them to be better--- well, you know what I'm saying. Problem is, you give these women way too much credit.CC

"You give these women way too much credit"? LOL. There are only two genders that exist, Men and Women. One can't exist without the other. If we were minor players in the whole thing you wouldn't be patronizing us, or spending time reading and writing reviews of us. If we didn't deserve the credit we get you would be at home, with your dick in your hand, doing some creative visualization.

Honey, You have to be joking--LOL LOL, etc---- I pay to get my dick sucked by you "ladies" LOL LOL ---so I don't have to listen to any of what you "ladies" may have to say about absolutely anything! By the way, I'm sitting here right now with my dick in both hands and guess what? It feels great!

I also thought he was kidding, but I'm afraid he isn't. Well, there are a$$holes in any community. As long as they remain a minority...

Your hilarious! I bet when you call a provider to make an appointment you don't call her a worthless whore, or tell her that her opinion doesn't matter cause you need that "lady" to spend time with you. Just admit it already, a symbiotic relationship exists between providers and hobbyists. It's mutually beneficial.

Villagegirl, CC is playing with your head and pulling your chain.  He's doing this for laughs (rather successfully), and he's providing entertainment for everyone who reads this stuff.  I actually think this is kind of funny, so perhaps if you spend more time spreading your legs, and less time thinking, you'll eventually get the joke!

Of course he's kidding!  His original comment was just a joke to set people off, and from the looks of things, he accomplished what he set out to do.  As the TER home page says, "this site is for entertainment purposes."  I was entertained reading all these posts.  Weren't you?

I didn't find it entertaining at all.  EOM

This is the #1 problem with allowing providers on the discussion board. Some cant take any criticism. I've read the reviews on Samantha as well as the other reviews that Snake has posted, which have been mostly positive and consistent with my experiences with similiar providers.  I think he has written a legitimate review. It seems that he did not like her looks and rated Samantha a 5. Kush wrote a review in Oct. 2002 and a rated her a 5 as well. Reading Samantha's original post one would think that she has 3 pages of 9-10, not the case. In fact only one 9 looks rating in 3 pages.

Snake also gives her an 8 for performance but specifically he had a bad session, everyone has a bad day, but worth noting. If you read the Sept 2002 post by Markyman he rates her looks a 6 and says "I wanted Greek but, this day it just wouldnt go in."
Sounds familiar.

Note the profile says that Samantha is thin, there is no way of knowing when the profile was created or if it is the opinion of all the reviewers. This is a big problem for TER. Specifically, if you read the review form TNBT written last August, she says that "Samantha may not be a teenager anymore," yet her profile says 26-30. While 26-30 is certainly not teenage, TNBT's quote would indicate to me the she is over 30 or if not looks like it.

I read these reviews and Samantha seems like an older provider not the most attractive, who tries very hard in session. Looks are subjective so if she is your type you probably cant go wrong, just bring your own lube.

Sorry for not sticking around last night to post a reply. I had a rough day yesterday tending to my fireplace, watching Tiger continue to kick ass on The PGA. I had to get some sleep--
OKOKOK- I have to admit that I was getting carried away. Of course I don't think providers are whores. However, I do believe they should not be able to participate on TER. I also believe in YMMV and that providers either provide good service or bad service and like the leopard will not change their spots because they received bad reviews on TER and I'm sticking to that.
I am not at all certain about the "symbiotic relationship" crap either. You're making way too much of this. The fact is, I need what I need & want what I want; that's what I'M sayin!!!  I am pleased to tell you I have been a hobbyist since 1979. Believe me, I know what I'm talking about when it comes to paying for sex. I just prefer to pay for it and not have to listen to most women's opinions; which is part of the game you have to play when you're involved in a relationship. Either way- men may pay now or they'll pay later--- but to some degree you're always going to have to pay in some way or another to be involved with women. I prefer to cut to the chase, get off and get on with my business.
By the way Villagegirl-- You are totally hot! I would love to spend some time with you. You would be surprised a what a gentleman I am. By the way, are you providing BBBJ yet? Cause if you are, I DEFINATELY want to be there!

I'm sorry to disappoint you, but barebacking something that's been on the prowl since 1979 isn't in my near future.

CC, I also know you were joking, to some degree. But you also have to know that some lurker somewhere was nodding his head in agreement with what you said so I felt the urge to give an entertaining retort of my own. No harm, no fowl. But interestingly enough you kept reading my posts.

HaHa, Made Ya Look!

Bareback is where it's at!  It also "explains" a huge percentage of pricing differentials.  Just stating a fact.

Each to his own!

Villagegirl,
Don't get me wrong, I do enjoy your posts. However, I am extremely depressed to hear BBBJ is not on your menu cause I'd love to give you some of my---- $$! And then some! What I don't understand, why is BBBJ such a problem? Does anyone know the percentage of providers who offer bareback? This could be a good TER weekly question, attn: NY moderator (my old penpal! yes, I'm still playing nice!)?
You know this whole thing started because little Samantha was cwying (no misspell) about her one bad review. I suppose I took issue with her being such a baby about the whole thing and really had the problem.
Anyway, I DO love all you ladies. Just keep getting me off! Party On!!CC

CC, do you partake in DATY?

Usualy no. It really depends on the woman I'm with. You look real sexy in your photos which tempts me to say yes I would want to participate in DATY with you. However, I would not know for certain until we were holding each other, getting acquainted, kissing, etc. If I was in the mood cause I was digging being with you; yeah I probably would with you.CC
ps gotta run to a meeting I'll respond to all later this PM-- Party On!! CC