than DATY to me, and many guys. I don't eat every provider I see, BUT I DO expect NO latex for a BJ for EVERY gal I see. I won't see a covered BJ gal ! NO WAY! I won't go DATY with a less than perfectly squeaky sweet clean lady either. I generally try to get early appointments as I hate being #9 of the day. You can't be a GFE if you apply a cover for head-- period.
There are plenty of GFE providers around, and especially among "touring girls". Your #s are suspect at best Baron-- no offense.
-- Modified on 2/19/2008 10:23:28 AM
I've been noticing more and more lately that there are a ton of providers advertising themselves as GFE.
For me there are a few requirements for a GFE:
1. The provider must enjoy (or really seem to enjoy) the session;
2. DFK;
3. DATY; and
4. Multiple pops (as many as time permits).
So, I did a search on TER for independents with at least 2 reviews, based in Manhattan, who share characteristics 2, 3 and 4 and also purport to be GFE providers. The search yielded about a dozen providers $300 and below and a dozen more above. I found this interesting given the 123 providers in eros listed as GFE and the endless number of CL providers making the same claim.
Now, my search on TER was hardly scientific as I'm sure there are some PSE providers mixed in among those I identify as GFE, but it's at least a rough estimate.
So, has the term lost its meaning? Does it just mean good service at this point?
Have other people found the same thing?
Is my definition of GFE too limiting?
A penny for your thoughts.
than DATY to me, and many guys. I don't eat every provider I see, BUT I DO expect NO latex for a BJ for EVERY gal I see. I won't see a covered BJ gal ! NO WAY! I won't go DATY with a less than perfectly squeaky sweet clean lady either. I generally try to get early appointments as I hate being #9 of the day. You can't be a GFE if you apply a cover for head-- period.
There are plenty of GFE providers around, and especially among "touring girls". Your #s are suspect at best Baron-- no offense.
-- Modified on 2/19/2008 10:23:28 AM
What the hell was that on youporn???
Well said.
Without bbbj, gfe is a contradiction in terms.
I specifically stated that I was only counting Manahattan based providers. If you disagree with my numbers, by all means, please provide a list of providers that meet the criteria. I would love to meet them.
As for BBBJTCIM, I agree, it's important, however, I wasn't trying to limit the group, I was trying to go the other way. If we add BBBJTCIM, I think we may be talking fewer than a dozen providers in each of the under $300 and over $300 categories.
Seems everyone has thier own standards for GFE requirements and it keeps changing. I can only speak for myself, as I provide excellent service for those I see and they come back for more!
I'm sure you are a wonderful woman and an excellent provider. My post was aimed at Manhattan based providers only. Perhaps I should have put that in the Subject line as there appear to be others who missed that.
Women are claiming Porn Star status if they do a private home movie these days. At least a google search will help you out there.
With a GFE gone south, you're left holding the bag. I agree with you specs though and one of the most important to me is that she be into the session.
But when you find a GFE that delivers it is wonderful.
B
-- Modified on 2/20/2008 4:47:07 PM
The minute someone invented the term "GFE" it lost its meaning. Sometimes, for my own amusement, I do a search on CL for "GFE" to see which providers are still using the term, and try to suss out what they may actually be trying to say by using it. The fact is, these days, if I see a provider ad that mentions "GFE", it tends to raise a red flag.