Yeah henry's reporting seems real suspect considering he, as an avid hobbiist has seen her last year, but only has one review.

I think this is a review the ter screeners should flag.

I haven't posted a review yet but she gets an A+_ for attitude and enthusiasm and I got no whiff of smoking from a girl that DFKs just about non stop from the time one arrives.
I can't speak to that reviewer's experience but if you like an inviting tall curvy girl she's it.

I would tend to agree if it were not for that being the only review under the handle.  But being a one review handle is a bit suspicious.  Proof no, but a bit suspicious.  I usually ignore those without any history if they are a lot different that the others.  This goes the other way also with one glowing review that could have been a friend of the provider.

of the long hours and unrelenting long hours and daily number of daily clients. I have seen all the top dolls on occasion in a state that a shadow of the how they looked and  performed when they are rested and relaxed. They admit that they suffer from job related stress. I can name a list of K-dolls who cracked up in the last year. All these realities are fact of life to them. However,, in this case having see the K-doll I did not sense fatigued or being jaded.

In this case I feel the  problem lies at the feet of the alleged reviewer , no previous reviews , posts or history. i  see a review where the author is trying to do a hatchet job , perhaps it is  a reaction of a potential predator to  being rebuffed. There is a mean spirited tone throughout the review . It is this kind of attitude and the unreasonable demand guys make to our K-dolls that is giving LA a bad name and motivating K-dolls to work elsewhere.