K-girls

Fake review alert for EBK (bay area) and Joe94577
team_rocket_qwerty 2358 reads
posted

Hello guys, Rocketman here.

Today I want to warn anyone who reads reviews to steer clear of reviews of user Joe94577 - see  

 
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/searchbyreviewerResults.asp?MemberName=Joe94577

Short digression -- I consider EBK one of the worst, if not worst org in bay. PO on a power trip, threatens to BL if you walk, threatens to BL if youre a minute later, lying, etc and a lot of lying about pics.

Now, once in a while there is a great girl that comes by, like Ace/Diva/Vixen, and then EBK is then worth going to, because girls >>>> orgs, but any ToFTT or any borderline decisions or any unknown quality, forget about it.

 

 
Anyway, it's pretty simple to see if you were on the donkey before, that joe is the same person who wrote literally dozens of fake reviews for EBK and SMK (San Mateo division that died out this year) back then. Just check the image I attached. It's pretty clear when his reviews are put together with ones from my my database.  

http://imgur.com/a/yul9fAw

 
All reviews follow same format, similar punctuation (double exclamation mark in the end), same grammatically incorrect phrases "to booked", "very please with her looks", "PO alert", calling missionary "mission", etc. Hell, he even used a similar to his previous alias jprice94577. All these phrases are ONLY found for EBK or SMK, not for thousands of other entries I have.

 
At best, imo he is some worker for org, at worst he's the PO/owner. Bad English aside, when I contacted him, he told me that he goes to EBK every week and spends 220 there, yet he didn't know that EBK changed the price to 240. I would think the PO/owner would know this.

 
Anyway, thank you for listening to this short PSA. Be on lookout for reviews with similar phrasing, diction and punctuation and format for EBK and don't let yourself get bamboozled.

PS If you're wondering, lovings213 is a sister org down in LA for EBK.

When I went to session with Miji, the hour rate was $240 but PO let me session for $220.  I asked about $220 for my next session but PO said $240 going forward.  Not worth it now; but perhaps when it starts raining...

team_rocket_qwerty267 reads

Twoon, I think most orgs will go to 240 soon.

SA is 240,and Tiana/Bella are 260
Bgc has raised prices, I think Gigi is 260 too.

 
To clarify, ebks price increase of 20 bucks is one od the least of my concerns.

Thank you for info tho!

GaGambler254 reads

Not to me of course, since I live in Texas, but your OP is EXACTLY the kind of post I think guys here have been wanting from you, specific warning about a specific person/agency/shill not just a bunch of generic crap about being pro-monger.

 
Kudos for a GREAT OP.

 
BTW once upon a time we had a poster in Atlanta who went by "Inspector Gadget" who later became a board mod. He would make a post about once a week with alerts about shady providers/agencies along with supporting documentation about their misdeeds. It was no wonder that one of the worst offenders, a Web Pimp that I too routinely called out for his transgressions offered a thousand dollar bounty for our personal information. lol I miss those days back in Atlanta when the community was just that, a real "community" maybe your post is the start of something like that happening here on this board?

I also noticed that the outlier girl got a 2-2 that he allegedly saw in MW, so that is probably a fake as well.  She has 27 reviews and  a 7.7 TER average, including his 2-2, with most of her reviews from the EC.  He complains she is fat, but about a third of her prior reviews already say she is chubby.  One has to wonder, with all of the talent in SoCal, why would he pick a chubby 7-7 girl to see while he was here when there are lots that are 8+?  You're right, this screams "fake" all the way around.  

team_rocket_qwerty254 reads

Many fake reviewers will try to appear as credible by inserting one or two reviews from orgs they don't shill, and lots of times they'd do it without seeing girls, just reading reviews and penning a similar one.  

 
Negative review(s) also helps their image.

 
Anyway thanks cdl and GaG for the kind words. This guy was pointed out to me by a buddy via a private channel, and while I immediately identified him, I try to not post until I have full evidence to share. Innocent until proven guilty,haha.

I busted you yesterday for alleging that your sweet spot is much older than the ages of your reviewed providers.  Time to admit the ruse and stop littering this board with your nonsense.

team_rocket_qwerty279 reads

You talk about littering board with nonsense, but out of your last 50 posts, all but like one or two are dedicated to/going at cdl.

 

This obsession you have with him is starting to look unhealthy,my dude.

So I took him off "ignore" for ten seconds to read the drivel about his alleged "bust."  He probably doesn't have VIP and therefore can't read my reviews, but anyone here can attest that MOST Kgirl profiles show incorrect ages and that its my consistent practice to correct the ages in the body of my review so that my fellow mongers are not caught by surprise.  Just because the profiles say 21-25 and the agency ad states the same thing does not mean its correct.  I call out age misrepresentations in almost every review I write.  He's never seen a Kgirl, so he has about as much personal knowledge as BLPOS.  The first thing the PM sender said was, "I guess he's never read one of your reviews - LOL"

 
According to the PM I got, he called me out for saying I prefer ladies that are older, and he "busted" me by saying all of the girls I have reviewed lately were 21-25, ACCORDING TO THEIR PROFILES.   Nearly every one of my reviews also said they were over 30, USUALLY IN THE FIRST PARAGRAPH, but if he didn't read the review because he can't afford VIP membership, then he wouldn't know that.   That's some bust, Einstein.   Maybe he should consider a little research before announcing his next BIG BUST.  LOL

 
I've also received some PM's from providers that have observed how unhinged he is, so he is shooting himself in the foot every time he posts.  It always a hoot to see a guy actively auditioning for village idiot, and with each post, he gets close.  Its an example of self-destruction at its finest, but he's too stupid to see it.  Bwahahahaha

You should purchase VIP and actually read his reviews before you start making absurd claims that 21-25 is his sweet spot.

The bigger question though, is why do you care what his sweet spot is? What’s the real story? Did he fuck your mother? Steal your gf? You are incredibly salty, and there’s got to be a reason for it.

cks175, I've asked that question on a few posts and never received an answer! What is the anger about and where is it coming from? The anger against Kgirls and the Mongers who love & see them. This is just my guess, but I think it has to do with the Kgirl community and ruining/bringing down TER from the way it used to be! I've read that rant a few times on different posts and think that is either the reason or one of the reasons for the anger/hatred! The bringing down of TER was never directed, or I didn't see it, at Kgirls & the Mongers! The rant was just that TER isn't what it used to be! It is just my guess! Maybe one day we'll get an answer to the question!

I think this is one example of why resurrecting old threads (this on 9 month) can just resurface the old crap few want to see again.

You want to know why there is "anger against Kgirls and the Mongers who love & see them?"

 
You have to go all the way back to TER in 2009.  At that time, the majority of K-girl action was in the L.A. area.  There was no K-girl board so K-mongers started posting on the L.A. discussion board.  Led by Harpman60 and Beemer310, they raved about K-girls as if they were the greatest thing since sliced bread.  There never was a negative word from the K-mongers so I started calling them "K-fanboys," and deservedly so.

 
They had a ranking system for K-girls, much like the military.  The lowest rank was "K-girl."  From there, the fanboys would "promote" K-girls to "K-dolls," "K-divas." "K-icons" and "K-legends."  It was ridiculous.  This is TER, a review board for reviewing hookers, both positively and negatively.  But K-fanboys treated TER as if it was a fanzine and you were only allowed to sing the praises of K-girls.

 
But it wasn't just enough to exalt K-girls and exult in their magnificence; K-fanboys led by Harpman60 and Beemer310 also trashed "indies."  Here is Harpman saying why K-girls were better than indies:
"No flakes, drivers, B&S, pimps, Rip-offs , upselling , bad attitude , no ignoring of calls,  text or emails, no rudeness, lack of appreciation  or feeling they are doing you favor by taking your money, no overpriced underperforming non ad resembling passed their prime imposters."
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/los-angeles-1/saved-by-the-k-dolls-285821?frmSearch=1#285821

 
Not only did Harpman go after "indies," he also attacked posters who didn't agree that all K-girls were "K-dolls."  This is how COEUR-DE-LION described Harpman on 7/1/2020:
"He was very nice . . .to those that always agreed with him, and he was Satan to those that didn't.  Anytime someone disagreed with anything he said, he would launch vitriolic attacks against the person, not just the ideas that were being challenged."

 
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!  Does that sound familiar?  Hell yes!  CDL was describing himself!!!!  He's doing today exactly what Harpman did back then.  So in essence, the K-girl board hasn't changed at all since it was part of the L.A. board.  

 
Before the K-fanboys started posting on the L.A. board, many providers posted there too.  But the K-fanboys viciously attacked the "indie" providers so they left the L.A. board.

 
Finally in 2013, thing got so bad on the L.A. board that TER created the K-girl board so the K-fanboys would have their own little playpen where they could trash "indies" and put K-girls up on a pedestal to their heart's content.  But the K-fanboys still don't tolerate dissent from the party line.  When rocket was new to the board and CDL didn't know how much experience rocket had elsewhere, CDL would attack him personally, saying things like rocket had "millennial hubris."
https://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/k-girl-113/this-is-typical-millennial-hubris----18368?page=

 
There isn't anger against K-girls and K-mongers as much as there is anger BY K-mongers against anyone who dares to make the slightest negative comment about K-girls.  Anything else you'd like to know Badger?

 
Hey Jensen: Looks like you were right about reviving old threads, lol!  

By day three on the new Kgirl board eight years ago, guys are already complaining that the Kgirl troll moved over to the new Kgirl board, too.  If anyone wonders who the Kgirl troll was, check the link below.  Its the same one we have now.  Lol  The guy's post got 7 likes, which I believe was a new high on the 3-day-old Kgirl board.  BigP's response got the usual 1 like, . . . . . from himself.  Lol

 
I've been a TER member since 2008, and you had to fast forward all the way to 2020 make an issue of the disagreement I had with Rocket when he first showed up here.     I admit Rocket and I got off to a shaky start, but we have both learned to get along a little better.  Before that, I will admit that I went after the Harpman posse who were exploiting Kgirls and running them out of town, but you seemed to want to ignore that.  Everyone here who actually sees Kgirls CAN have something worthwhile to contribute from time to time.  The trolls that don't see Kgirls have nothing to contribute.  As the poster in the link below lamented on day three of the new Kgirl board, you are just here to lurk and stir the pot.  Your response was lame.  He got 7 likes for that statement, but you have no self-awareness of your standing here.  Any normal person would shirk away in embarrassment, but not you.  

 
I often wonder if some of the guys who posted in those early days who don't seem to be active anymore are still here under a different username?  What do you think?   I guess we may never know.  

GaGambler246 reads

That post has EIGHT likes, not seven

 
Ok, I just gave it a "like" myself, a little belatedly of course, but a like none the less. lol

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/k-girl-113/twin-brothers-in-the-kgirl-world-5349?page=

 

Over five years ago, someone compared you to Harpman.  He listed all the similar traits you and Harpman shared.  Guess who came to your defense?  ME!!

 
Now, 5+ years later, I can safely say that you are 100 times worse than Harpman.  Every single post of yours is a lie, which you call "poetic license."  When Harpman went down, his followers and admirers had egg on their faces.  When you go down, your followers will have a three-egg omelette on their faces.

Thanks for the answer. I guess I was right, you have two factions that just got out of control about their beliefs and TER isn't what it used to be. Even though this is an old thread the fight is still going on, on new threads all the time! Now, I didn't revive it, I just responded to a post. But, I would revive or respond to any post if I had a question.

I just read this on the L.A. board,

HelpAGuyOut24 hours ago2 reads1 likes
Talent
Agree the talent is non-existent.  Every time I branch out from my pre-covid regulars to spice it up a bit its been a disaster!  Lots of cash for zero return.  I spend a ton of time researching and researching to still be disappointed.  And the pool is very small.  Most are well beyond their prime and beyond my age range.  I pay top dollar and every time its been what a waste of money.  Very, very disappointing.  I'm just going to stick with my regulars for a while until this situation changes.  Much cheaper.  

Guys, mongers, hobbyists will see who they want to and who they like, me included! I like and love the whole Kgirl scene, as is my choice. Just like the guy who wrote the paragraph above, his likes, his choice. I say live & let live, just enjoy the ladies, while you can!  

I should have put this in when I did the post, sorry.
Just in case there is some confusion , the paragraph about the trouble with the providers, help a guy out, is complaining about are indies.

Four reviews in March, all for ebk.

 
Two for the same girl Cemi, the second one having nothing to do with the first one. He probably forgot he was supposed to review another girl he saw.

 
SMH

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/searchbyreviewerResults.asp?MemberName=Joe94577

I guess the business model of high prices along with shit service didn't work out for them.
The only thing good about that place was the EZ parking.

KL gone too. That location got compromised it seems.

 
Oh well, won't shed any tears.

Seems like they got raided. KL popped smoke soon afterward.

Register Now!