...donate 300 for gfe and 350 for pse in the bay area?
I ask because I have a theory. It goes like this: We Bay Area clients are smack in the heart of maybe the biggest economic engine in the country, yet K-Girl rates are 10-20% less than other places. Any decent 20-something will come here and immediately feel screwed, pardon the pun. If they do have independence and mobility, they'd be fools not to bail outta here for LA or any other region. The only ones who stay are those who no one in those other markets would accept at the rates asked. We must look like cheap-ass bastards here compared to the dream of landing in Silicon valley. The only way the talent is going to stay here is if they get what they see as locale-appropriate compensation. I say that as someone who is priced out of the game at those rates, so please don't flame me too badly. Discuss. sagon this one. I have often said that the BA is a convenient POE for Kgirls coming to the US, but they don't stay long once they find out they make more in other cities. There are plenty of places to work. Some orgs have locations in multiple cities within the BA where they can move the girls around for potential business from more mongers, and its well-known as a sanctuary city, so even in the unlikely event they are busted, they will not be deported. Its a good place to learn the ropes before venturing out to greener pastures.
Vegas put themselves on the Kgirl map by attracting girls from California by charging $300 when at the time, the LA rate was $250. If they saw five guys in a day, it was like seeing six in LA. Same money, less work. They were also the first city to have Kgirl outcall at an upcharge of $100. The upcharge is shared between the girl and her driver.
I completely agree with your hypothesis that raising rates would both retain and attract a better grade of Kgirl, and it probably wouldn't price you or most other guys out of the market. It just mean 3 a month instead of 4, or some other multiple with a similar reduction in frequency.
In your reply to sagacity's OP, you said: "...raising rates...probably wouldn't price you...out of the market." WRONG!! The last line of sagacity's post clearly states: "I say that as someone who is priced out of the game at those rates..." ($300-$350).
You are so self-absorbed and only concerned with bragging about yourself in your long-winded posts that you didn't bother to read or remember sagacity's previous posts about his ability to pay increased rates:
"I can't stay in this game at $300/pop. Not a rich McLaren owner."
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/k-girl-113/wow-280-hr-adel--luxury-lips-20113?frmSearch=1#20113
"I’ve been blessed that the game has been in reach, couldn’t hang in LA or Vegas for sure."
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/k-girl-113/sticker-shock-20126?frmSearch=1#20126
"I don't have dot-com income. I value my sessions."
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion-boards/k-girl-113/taking-a-break-orgs-have-too-many-fake-misleading-profiles-18512?frmSearch=1#18512
You also missed how remarkable sagacity's OP is. He is so unselfish that he is more concerned about seeing that K-girls are properly compensated even if it means he would be priced out of seeing K-girls if their rates went up appreciably. Amazing!!
Don't worry though, you're not alone. sagacity's post had 144 reads with no replies until you and your dumbass post. The others were gobsmacked that a K-monger would call for K-girls' rates to increase. Saying "K-girls should increase their rates" to a K-monger is like saying "work" to Maynard G. Krebs.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqzpQPDSr2s
Would be like saying "The buffet is closed" to a certain lard ass, lying, racist, piece of shit who keeps posting on this board even though nobody wants him here.
BTW what ever happened to "don't tell hookers how much to charge" K-Girls, just like all the other hookers are free to set their rates as high or as low as they see fit, and as consumers, (not you lard ass who can't get it up) we are free to either agree to pay said rates or to go see someone else. I will concede to the OP that getting hot girls to charge as little as $220 hr in a market with as high a cost of living as the Bay Area does seem unsustainable.
Maynard G Krebs references probably mean more over on the Over 60 forum.
Even Gilligan might be ancient history to some of these guys.
You are correct sir...barely.
I don’t know what the right price is. But I usually don’t pay just the base rate unless I’m absolutely never planning on coming back. And that hasn’t happened in a while.
But I do believe the market tends to adjust itself. And I think we’re seeing some of that adjustment going on right now.
Considering we pay $300/$320 on the EC for GFE, I consider $350 for PSE a steal. I've yet to encounter an agency girl advertising it though.
the North Korean girls that have been leading the charge into BBFS have not strayed far off of the West Coast yet. They seem to be the leaders in coming out and advertising BB. They do seem to have discovered Las Vegas, but Vegas has been at $300 for GFE service for a couple of years now. Since I don't see girls who advertise BBFS, I don't know what the upcharge is there for BBFS. Maybe someone who knows can help me out with that. South Korean girls have been able to charge $100 more in SoCal and Vegas for BBFS. I haven't seen any advertised at $350, but The Ktown org that was the first in SoCal to opening advertise BBFS is still at $360 for the hour, but they also get a lot of girls that speak little or no English.
I can't speak for the Bay area, but here in NOVA I've never paid less than $300 for a K-date. I understand that
$260 gets you a session, but the extra $40 is for "GFE plus." "Plus" is good. I pay for it. That's why I don't understand why one of the anti-Asian racists on this board (who as far as far as I can tell has never seen a K-girl) keeps calling them cheapie dates.
It's not that I "donate" $300--but I have no issue AT ALL with a financial transaction whereby $300 buys me what I want. Win-win.
That's what makes it difficult paying some of the non k-girl rates. The K-girls do so much more and for a lot less. When was the last time you got rimming from a non K-girl and if so how many did it.
Kgirls love rimming, I often wonder if it could be said that they are addicted to "crack." LOL
It's how they stay so thin, they love eating tossed salad.
Kgirls love rimming, I often wonder if it could be said that they are addicted to "crack." LOL
I"m not sure I would say "love rimming". I nearly (99.9%) always pass and I've never seen any of the K-Girls seem disappointed at all and most seem happy with my choice.
I don't think they see it as any type of taboo which I suspect a lot of the western providers might -- but that is probably because Asians have a much longer history or very good hygiene and washing their ass rather than merely wiping. So perhaps the ass is not seen as being as dirty as is the case for western culture.
Why do you pass 99.9% of the time, Jensen? Does it not feel good to you, or is it hygeine/germ related?
Just curious
It was always more a novelty thing to me so doesn't really excite me that much. I much prefer DFK and there is a bit of the do I want to kiss the mouth that was just sucking my ass aspect but am not really worried about hygiene. I *was* there when it got washed after all
Just not really my thing so even the minor imagery of kissing my own ass as it were is generally more than enough to off-set any "thrill" I get from rimming.
And, to be honest, anyone who plays in the area that has serious germ or hygiene phobias cannot be enjoying them self that much I would imagine. Though you do hear the "I only book first appointment of the day" at times (used to be more often claimed" as if that meant something meaningful about the girls hygiene for a session.
I always decline simply because I don’t care for it. I don’t care for the nipple sucking thing, either. But I’ll tolerate it for about 30 seconds or so.
So do you kiss or not kiss them after they BBBJ you in the shower? It's not like your dick is bone dry while they are sucking on it. Just saying...
While having come back after a hiatus from mid 2017 to late 2019 I have also been paying 3 for most visits. They don't seem to be calling them GFE and GFE+ as they used. As a new customer they seem to break things on time (but also suspect the bookers are trying to ensure top prices so not being clear on options -- don't see a rate schedule posted these days).
That said, before I never really noticed much difference if I paid for + or not -- yes the expectation was that + ensured CIM but that's not such a big deal for me. I like to finish during the fucking. If I knew I really wanted to have CIM for a given sessions I'd pay up. But still, more than a few times I ended up getting CIM for a regular session. I would also sometimes just ask for + but never ask for CIM as something of the tip for the girl (though generally if I was going to tip I just tipped directly)
But you're right, the 40 is not really something that I would sweat about so having the booker always "offer" me the 300 option is not an issue or bother me.